Well, I also think the noble savage stuff is complete bullshit, but in Rousseau's writings, he says that it is possible that this pre modern edenistic utopia didn't ever exist. I read one academic's paper on JJR which said that he did not actually intend man to live in a society with the General Will, it was more of a thought experiment. That being said, academics always cop out like that when their theories end up taking a shit on society. People say the same thing with Marx.Hastur wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 2:37 pmIt's Rousseau's misanthropy I can't stand. His historical pessimism (history means decay) coupled with his optimism toward primitive man (man is naturally good) that I can't stand. He was a cultural arsonist on a colossal scale. I think it all stemmed from self-hatred. He realized what an appalling man he was, assumed everyone else was the same and blamed civilization for his own shortcomings.heydaralon wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 2:29 pmI'm not a fan.
However, I see Marx and Rousseau as being a lot closer ideologically than you do. I think the General Will is pretty much a proto type of what you saw implemented in Russia and China. Rousseau didn't quite have Marx's burning hatred for religion, but he pretty much laid all the framework down for him.
"Weak men are dangerous" - Dr. Jordan B Peterson
I agree with you that he loathed himself. He was a chronic thief and liar, sexually repressed, and he abandoned his 5 children at a foundling home. The condition of orphanages at that time was such that the infants almost certainly died. This is extra funny when you consider that he was widely respected as an authority on child-rearing and wrote Emile which is about the ideal education of the youth. Kind of a hypocrite.