Not my opinion at all.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:52 amC-Mag wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:51 am+1DBTrek wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:40 am
How about we stick with the data demonstrating one is far superior to the other, unless you have additional data showing otherwise?
Because the data shows that the past is clearly healthier than the present in this case - which contradicts your claim that the past has always been “unhealthy”.
The data clearly shows that heterosexual 2 parent homes raise the most productive, happiest and most well adjusted kids. Not just now, or 50 years ago, and not just in the US either.
It's overwhelming.
Gay parents better than no parents IMHO.
Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
-
- Posts: 18733
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
We know, you've told us, but they are.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 10:32 amNot my opinion at all.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
I've been married to a big Italian American alpha-personality man for 29 years. I am battle-hardened. You lot are the gentle lull in my day. Two great 20-something kids. I have no complaints.
That's why I get such a kick out of STA insisting I'm some kind of degenerate. I'm more likely to show up at someone's place to clean and stock it with food than to protest or carouse.
-
- Posts: 18733
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
You have to remind this crowd ever-so-often that you're Kath but an inch on the other side of the line.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 11:05 amI've been married to a big Italian American alpha-personality man for 29 years. I am battle-hardened. You lot are the gentle lull in my day. Two great 20-something kids. I have no complaints.
That's why I get such a kick out of STA insisting I'm some kind of degenerate. I'm more likely to show up at someone's place to clean and stock it with food than to protest or carouse.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
Those are historical figures, not degrading images. It's disturbing that you don't see the difference.C-Mag wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:37 amWell, this isn't the racial debate thread, but I wouldn't be anymore offended by it than I am of images of Che Guevera or Mao............. which seem to be OK in our society.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:31 amHistory existed. It is what it is. That said, if that was a drawing of a Sambo would it be ok to put it up in an office?C-Mag wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:12 amIt's not trolling, it's a serious question. Because the logical end result of the Social Justice +MeToo movements is these guys are Toxic Male Criminals and all evidence they existed will need to be destroyed.
At a more personal level, can I have this picture on the wall at work ?
I'd like MilSpecs perspective on this, if I had that picture up, would I be sexualizing the workplace?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
Depends. Gay men I suspect could be okay. Lesbian women would be like doubling down on single motherhood. Most of the time I read about some young boy getting hormone treatment so his penis can be chopped off at age 18, it is two lesbian mothers behind the abuse.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 11:01 amWe know, you've told us, but they are.
Most of the gay men I know and talk to each day (I live in one of their areas of the country) are pretty solid dudes. Actually more so in the sense that few of them are blue pilled at all. They see this gender war for what it is. Some of them cheer it on because they want fit heterosexual men to give up on the women.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Fri Oct 12, 2018 11:37 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
Kath will speak for herself but I posted about my background just now, not my views. We have different backgrounds.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 11:07 amYou have to remind this crowd ever-so-often that you're Kath but an inch on the other side of the line.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 11:05 amI've been married to a big Italian American alpha-personality man for 29 years. I am battle-hardened. You lot are the gentle lull in my day. Two great 20-something kids. I have no complaints.
That's why I get such a kick out of STA insisting I'm some kind of degenerate. I'm more likely to show up at someone's place to clean and stock it with food than to protest or carouse.
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
So, someone who's family was killed by Communists don't get a voice to say that Che or Mao are offensive images ?MilSpecs wrote: ↑Fri Oct 12, 2018 11:09 amThose are historical figures, not degrading images. It's disturbing that you don't see the difference.
BTW: All the confederate statues coming down are historical figures
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
PURITAN ALERT!
I'm expecting a declaration that this calendar is inappropriate in any American workspace:
I'm expecting a declaration that this calendar is inappropriate in any American workspace:
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Responses to Matriarchy vs. Patriarchy
They were real human beings who existed. They weren't deliberately created images.