fair point. props to the democrats for pulling out all the stops to derail his nomination, i'm not a fan of him and i thought the allegations would ultimately defeat himJohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:30 pmNobody knows what happened, but if they both lied to bolster their side in regards to a rape allegation, neither of those lies is insignificant imo. His lie concerns me more than hers because he is the one jockeying to make decisions that will affect the public.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:18 amwell he did go through those three days of testimony, i've never been a barista but im sure many of them lie about boofing in the 80s tooJohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:48 amI don’t understand why its even being argued in kavanaughs favor that he faced perjury if he gets caught lying, one would think that gives him even more incentive to be honest, which he wasn’t.
Nobody said it was just any job interview, but even lying on your application at Starbucks is enough to get it thrown in the trash, apparently standards for the Supreme Court don’t meet the barista threshold?
i guess i fall on his side positively, or rather he gets more sympathy from me, because her lies appear to be more significant and calculated. downplaying his party boy past is to be expected yknow, lying about puking and that sort of shit just doesnt do it for me as far as "perjury" goes. that words gets thrown around pretty carelessly on both sides, in my non-lawyerly opinion
again im not stoked on neo-con kavanaugh so im not trying to rally to his defense here
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Scored a point up in that smooth brain of yours eh? Good job buddyFife wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:16 am*we*JohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:12 amThe idea that not giving him the Supreme Court job would be tantamount to presuming he’s guilty without evidence is laughable. Here’s an example: we ask him a question, he gives a ridiculously implausible answer. We say, thank you for your time, we are still presuming you are innocent, but you acting like we’re too stupid to know that you’re lying is kind of a concern, and since you’re not willing to clear any of it up we’ll go with any of the other qualified candidates
:goteam: :drunk:
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Props? Merrick Garland was akin to the holocaust but rape allegations with no evidence gets props. The modern democrat party for you.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:35 pmfair point. props to the democrats for pulling out all the stops to derail his nomination, i'm not a fan of him and i thought the allegations would ultimately defeat himJohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:30 pmNobody knows what happened, but if they both lied to bolster their side in regards to a rape allegation, neither of those lies is insignificant imo. His lie concerns me more than hers because he is the one jockeying to make decisions that will affect the public.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:18 am
well he did go through those three days of testimony, i've never been a barista but im sure many of them lie about boofing in the 80s too
i guess i fall on his side positively, or rather he gets more sympathy from me, because her lies appear to be more significant and calculated. downplaying his party boy past is to be expected yknow, lying about puking and that sort of shit just doesnt do it for me as far as "perjury" goes. that words gets thrown around pretty carelessly on both sides, in my non-lawyerly opinion
again im not stoked on neo-con kavanaugh so im not trying to rally to his defense here
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
props to the republicans for pulling out most of the stops to derail his nomination too, i didnt like him either. you sound like a dork claiming im a democratclubgop wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:23 pmProps? Merrick Garland was akin to the holocaust but rape allegations with no evidence gets props. The modern democrat party for you.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:35 pmfair point. props to the democrats for pulling out all the stops to derail his nomination, i'm not a fan of him and i thought the allegations would ultimately defeat himJohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:30 pm
Nobody knows what happened, but if they both lied to bolster their side in regards to a rape allegation, neither of those lies is insignificant imo. His lie concerns me more than hers because he is the one jockeying to make decisions that will affect the public.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I didn't like Kavenaugh before, but now I am hoping he becomes a wrathful angel of justice against the left's culture war after going through that injustice
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Send him a note asking home to man up, attached to a 6-pack.
Let the left deal with drunk and angry supreme justice Kavanaugh.
Let the left deal with drunk and angry supreme justice Kavanaugh.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Oh is Captain Save-a-Ho back? LMFAO.
Get outside here you fucking liberal. Go he a womanz ally at HuffPo.
Get outside here you fucking liberal. Go he a womanz ally at HuffPo.