Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by pineapplemike » Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:59 am

they need to be made from hash too

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14795
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:04 am

Hastur wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:00 am
The Conservative wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:32 am
Hastur wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 6:57 am
I'm no fan of Sam Harris but he makes some good points here. Worth a listen.

So, what points were good again?
What was already pointed out. The job interview factor and the obvious lying. He lost me half way through the way he’s ignoring her obvious lying and political motives.
I'm not asking you to regurgitate other people's talking points, I want to know what you think... I know, it's a novel concept.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:06 am

I'll buy a hashtag t-shirt if they are unbleached hemp with organic dyes made in a carbon neutral factory complying with fair trade working condition regulations.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14795
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:09 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:06 am
I'll buy a hashtag t-shirt if they are unbleached hemp with organic dyes made in a carbon neutral factory complying with fair trade working condition regulations.
You'll buy what we have, and you'll like it!
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:11 am

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Kath » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:16 am

Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14795
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:58 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:11 am
Image
I have Autism, and I can pick up, and dish out sarcasms better than you.
#NotOneRedCent

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:32 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:06 am
I'll buy a hashtag t-shirt if they are unbleached hemp with organic dyes made in a carbon neutral factory complying with fair trade working condition regulations.
You sound like the guy in the Bud Light commercial that wants a light mead. Your fate will be the same as his.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14795
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:49 pm

PartyOf5 wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:32 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:06 am
I'll buy a hashtag t-shirt if they are unbleached hemp with organic dyes made in a carbon neutral factory complying with fair trade working condition regulations.
You sound like the guy in the Bud Light commercial that wants a light mead. Your fate will be the same as his.
At least people who drink light mead still drink alcohol, he is more like he wants liquid courage in a bottle as long it's soy milk based.
#NotOneRedCent

JohnDonne
Posts: 1018
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by JohnDonne » Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:30 pm

pineapplemike wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:18 am
JohnDonne wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:48 am
I don’t understand why its even being argued in kavanaughs favor that he faced perjury if he gets caught lying, one would think that gives him even more incentive to be honest, which he wasn’t.

Nobody said it was just any job interview, but even lying on your application at Starbucks is enough to get it thrown in the trash, apparently standards for the Supreme Court don’t meet the barista threshold?
well he did go through those three days of testimony, i've never been a barista but im sure many of them lie about boofing in the 80s too

i guess i fall on his side positively, or rather he gets more sympathy from me, because her lies appear to be more significant and calculated. downplaying his party boy past is to be expected yknow, lying about puking and that sort of shit just doesnt do it for me as far as "perjury" goes. that words gets thrown around pretty carelessly on both sides, in my non-lawyerly opinion

again im not stoked on neo-con kavanaugh so im not trying to rally to his defense here
Nobody knows what happened, but if they both lied to bolster their side in regards to a rape allegation, neither of those lies is insignificant imo. His lie concerns me more than hers because he is the one jockeying to make decisions that will affect the public.