Trump's SCOTUS

[PartyOf5]

I happen to believe Dr. Ford. I certainly haven't seen anything that disproves her accusations.

What about the witnesses she named that all refute her claim? None of them remember any such event. You're taking her word over the word of Kavanaugh and at least 3 others, one of which was Ford's friend, nor some buddy of Kavanaugh.

There is no reason to believe her and many reasons not to. Looking at this logically instead of emotionally leaves no other conclusion than his innocence. I'm not saying 100% she was never abused, but there is no proof it was even Kavanaugh.

[TheAmericanNomad]

Equating financial success with The Patriarchy, then finding that measure wanting, is a Straw Man. (Wealth isn’t even one of its core attributes, though it generates wealth.)

I'm not trying to create a straw man. You said the democrats court losers. I'm asking you to give me the measure on which you are making that judgement and why incels can't be judged by their ability to attract a mate. That seems to me, to be as fair of a measure as any other. Money was the next most obvious one. If you have another measure, I am asking you to provide it.

You, for example, appear to be a Loser, and I’m getting that just from seeing you post for a couple days. List your accomplishments: wife, kids, career, travel, education, control over your life. If you are low in all these things then you are a Loser in The Patriarchy game and would be willing to kick it over.

LOL. So this is how the forum leader here acts eh?

"Democrats are losers!"
"What measure are you using for that?"
"You! You are a loser!"

Okay dude, great argument. I was just asking you to define the terms we are debating under. And you can't even do that. No wonder your community is dominated by the overflow of another, more successful, podcaster's former posters.

My accomplishments? Why? I'm not sure how that is relevant. I have a published book, available at Barnes and Nobel and Amazon and Wal-Mart. I don't have a wife but I've been with my girlfriend for six years. I pay my own expenses with money I make doing what I've wanted to do since I was a child: writing. And I do that without a piece of paper from our governmental brain washing facilities. I've been all over the US, except for Alaska and the Northwest. I've been to Mexico, Costa Rica, Greece, Japan, Slovakia, Czech Republic, a few other countries but for such a short time they aren't worth mentioning.

But again, I don't see how that is relevant to how we define loser, or what evidence that the dnc is full of them and the gop isn't.

So I consider myself a success. Or at least, someone working towards success.

[Martin Hash]

I happen to believe Dr. Ford. I certainly haven't seen anything that disproves her accusations.

What about the witnesses she named that all refute her claim? None of them remember any such event. You're taking her word over the word of Kavanaugh and at least 3 others, one of which was Ford's friend, nor some buddy of Kavanaugh.

There is no reason to believe her and many reasons not to. Looking at this logically instead of emotionally leaves no other conclusion than his innocence. I'm not saying 100% she was never abused, but there is no proof it was even Kavanaugh.

It doesn’t matter who’s telling the truth. There would need to be admissible evidence in a court of law, and under 17 is considered a juvenile anyway.

The Matriarchy wants to change the very basics of Liberal American jurisprudence. Marxism reigns in their ranks.

[Martin Hash]

I'm not trying to create a straw man. You said the democrats court losers. I'm asking you to give me the measure on which you are making that judgement and why incels can't be judged by their ability to attract a mate. That seems to me, to be as fair of a measure as any other. Money was the next most obvious one. If you have another measure, I am asking you to provide it.

You, for example, appear to be a Loser, and I’m getting that just from seeing you post for a couple days. List your accomplishments: wife, kids, career, travel, education, control over your life. If you are low in all these things then you are a Loser in The Patriarchy game and would be willing to kick it over.

LOL. So this is how the forum leader here acts eh?

"Democrats are losers!"
"What measure are you using for that?"
"You! You are a loser!"

Okay dude, great argument. I was just asking you to define the terms we are debating under. And you can't even do that. No wonder your community is dominated by the overflow of another, more successful, podcaster's former posters.

My accomplishments? Why? I'm not sure how that is relevant. I have a published book, available at Barnes and Nobel and Amazon and Wal-Mart. I don't have a wife but I've been with my girlfriend for six years. I pay my own expenses with money I make doing what I've wanted to do since I was a child: writing. And I do that without a piece of paper from our governmental brain washing facilities. I've been all over the US, except for Alaska and the Northwest. I've been to Mexico, Costa Rica, Greece, Japan, Slovakia, Czech Republic, a few other countries but for such a short time they aren't worth mentioning.

But again, I don't see how that is relevant to how we define loser, or what evidence that the dnc is full of them and the gop isn't.

So I consider myself a success. Or at least, someone working towards success.

Dude, you asked for metrics, I provided them, you responded with non-Loser (remember, capital-L) credentials. I’d think you were advantaged by The Patriarchy. I at least say I’m a Democrat and run for office as a Democrat and debate as a Democrat; I know who makes up the majority of my Party - Losers.

[Montegriffo]

Is it at all possible that she didn't want to report it when it happened but when she saw him about to get on the SCOTUS, she decided she had a responsibility to say something? Is that even a possibility in your mind?

I said the same thing near the start of this thread. I got the same response, ie ''you're a hack bitch democrat''.
As far as I know there is not a single democrat voter on this forum but some members are so desperate for an enemy to strawman they consider anyone not toeing the alt-right line to be a hack bitch.
I've never voted Labour in my life but have been called everything from a democrat hack to a Marxist child fucker.
Welcome to the MHF.

[Fife]

I hear that train a-comin

[Martin Hash]

Dude, look in my “Provenance” area of the forum, you’ll see my Voter’s Pamphets listing “Democrat,” plus other Democrat-related entries back to 1976.

[clubgop]

Is it at all possible that she didn't want to report it when it happened but when she saw him about to get on the SCOTUS, she decided she had a responsibility to say something? Is that even a possibility in your mind?

I said the same thing near the start of this thread. I got the same response, ie ''you're a hack bitch democrat''.
As far as I know there is not a single democrat voter on this forum but some members are so desperate for an enemy to strawman they consider anyone not toeing the alt-right line to be a hack bitch.
I've never voted Labour in my life but have been called everything from a democrat hack to a Marxist child fucker.
Welcome to the MHF.

Hack bitches of a feather...

[pineapplemike]

in the time of chimpanzees i was a monkey https://youtu.be/YgSPaXgAdzE

[Montegriffo]

Dude, look in my “Provenance” area of the forum, you’ll see my Voter’s Pamphets listing “Democrat,” plus other Democrat-related entries back to 1976.

Sorry Martin but you are not a democrat.
About the only Dem tennet you have is tax the rich. Everything else you seem to believe is on the right of the spectrum.
I don't know what your views were back in '76 but you cannot be a Democrat Trump supporter.