Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
There is a very distinct possibility an unhinged leftist will make an attempt on Kavenaugh or a republican rep/senator.
The MSM, I think, is trying to foment this in a way they can deny after the fact, or even better: blame it all on republicans.
The MSM, I think, is trying to foment this in a way they can deny after the fact, or even better: blame it all on republicans.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The mental illness in the Democratic party has nothing to do with Kavanaugh or whatever delusions you've cooked up for yourself.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 7:14 amThere's a lot of mental illness in the Democratic Party. The screeching White women and young people may have a line, but I guarantee there are loons with no such barriers, and the atmosphere supports extremity.clubgop wrote: ↑Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:44 pmAlright, stop it. These people are insane, these people are deranged but they know and worship victimology. They know violence against elected officials is a step too far.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:53 pmA single Republican senator assassinated tonight would be enough to derail this. Of course, it’s being planned somewhere; I hope SS protection is on high for all of them. They could get the guy at his daughter’s wedding tomorrow.
Yeah, they ARE killing people. Everyday. In the Middle east. Alongside republicans, jah boy Trump and the intelligence community. That's the mental illness. The same mental illness that forces them to vote for Shillary. The same mental illness that causes the creation of the surveillance state. The same mental illness that supports torture so long as it is their guy doing it.
But fighting against some half drunk who is going to repeal Roe v Wade? Not really a mental illness. Seems pretty reasonable and expected to me. Regardless if you are pro-choice or pro-life, the fight against Kavanaugh was as predictable as its conclusion.
And lets be perfectly, clear: there are murderous loons on both sides. An alt-right guy ran over people during protests. An incel ran over people in Toronto. And yes, some Bernie bro shot people at the Congressional baseball game. This isn't one sided, there are plenty of people on both sides capable and willing to use violence.
The gutless democrats have no one to blame but themselves, of course. They are as inept politically as they are capable at corruption. They threw away the fillibuster so Obama could get some appointments on the lower courts, and now the Republicans can stack the SCOTUS without any consent by the minority party. It's as if they think they will always be in power but as anyone with a brain knows, so long as the two party system exists, it will be cyclical. And so of course they loss power and put themselves in an even weaker position than they were during Bush.
And so now, thousands of women across the country will be throwing themselves down stairs or shoving coat hangers up their pussies. All because the democrats don't understand how the system they help build, works.
And meanwhile, kids who weren't even born when 9/11 happened will be sent over to the middle east to kill thousands of already birthed babies, and everyone here will just ignore that and pat ourselves on the back because we are finally a moral country that doesn't kill unborn babies. Even though a lot of those babies will die anyway and the ones who are born will get no support from the people who forced their parents to birthed them. Rather, they will be happy to see them thrust into poverty. More candidates for the prison industrial complex.
Mental illness is right, but you are infected if you think it is limited to the democratic party.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
One side? It was 1 person. Not one of the GOP leaders encouraged it or condoned it. Democrats leaders are directly telling people to stalk and harass people.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 6:32 amOne side ran people over with a Dodge Charger and it isn't the one that wants to stop Kavanaugh.
Oh, and thanks for making your bias so obvious. Now we don't have to deal with pages full of you trying to convince us that you are just an independent normie with no side.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Political violence is almost always one person. (JFK notwithstanding) And it is almost always condemned by politicians on both sides. (Trump after the Charger notwithstanding).
Telling people to harass senators isn't the same as advocating violence, not even close. If these REPRESENTATIVES can't handle what the people they are supposed to be representing want to say to them, then they should resign. I'm sure there is a cushy job at a weapons manufacturer waiting for them anyway.
Telling people to harass senators isn't the same as advocating violence, not even close. If these REPRESENTATIVES can't handle what the people they are supposed to be representing want to say to them, then they should resign. I'm sure there is a cushy job at a weapons manufacturer waiting for them anyway.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 7:47 amOne side? It was 1 person. Not one of the GOP leaders encouraged it or condoned it. Democrats leaders are directly telling people to stalk and harass people.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 6:32 amOne side ran people over with a Dodge Charger and it isn't the one that wants to stop Kavanaugh.
Oh, and thanks for making your bias so obvious. Now we don't have to deal with pages full of you trying to convince us that you are just an independent normie with no side.
Oh I have a side. It is just not the side of the democrats or the republicans. It might be hard for your mind to comprehend, but there are other sides.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I could respond to a lot more, but I'm going to limit myself to this piece.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 7:44 amBut fighting against some half drunk who is going to repeal Roe v Wade? Not really a mental illness. Seems pretty reasonable and expected to me. Regardless if you are pro-choice or pro-life, the fight against Kavanaugh was as predictable as its conclusion.
There is plenty of fighting him that has been full of crazy. Let's start with setting up a fake sexual assault story and then having Democrat leaders sit on it until the last second in the hopes the combination of doubt and late timing will be enough to derail his nomination. Your #metoo Democrat leaders just showed they don't give a f*uck about abuse victims other than how they can use them to their advantage.
Then you have a bunch of #metoo-ers protesting acting like Kavanaugh was the man that raped all of them. The mental illness there is obvious. Nevermind taking each claim on it's individual merits, let's burn him at the stake because some 55 year old claims he did something in high school even after the only evidence we have all proves he didn't do it. Let's call anyone that support Kavanaugh a rapist or rape defender because of this. THAT is some mental illness right there.
Reasonable would be arguing against his confirmation based on his prior work as a judge. But the Democrats didn't feel they could win on reasonable so they went the Saul Alinsky route.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Typical lefty response. The leaders call on people to not let them eat or shop anywhere. Call them evil. Do everything short of calling for them to be shot. Then when one of their flock predictably goes that additional step, claim innocence to inciting it. "Well, we didn't call for THAT. We just said to harass them and never let them do anything in public. I don't know how that could have been taken to mean commit violence by a mentally unstable supporter of ours".TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 7:53 amTelling people to harass senators isn't the same as advocating violence, not even close.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Sorry, not buying that after your comment about the Charger guy. You already outed yourself.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 7:54 amOh I have a side. It is just not the side of the democrats or the republicans. It might be hard for your mind to comprehend, but there are other sides.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
What's everybody else having on a lovely football Saturday morning?
It's an all lager and pilsner day. No punkin spice IPAs today faggots.
It's an all lager and pilsner day. No punkin spice IPAs today faggots.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Okay, let me rephrase that then. It isn't any crazier than the shit that goes on in politics all the time.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 8:07 amI could respond to a lot more, but I'm going to limit myself to this piece.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 7:44 amBut fighting against some half drunk who is going to repeal Roe v Wade? Not really a mental illness. Seems pretty reasonable and expected to me. Regardless if you are pro-choice or pro-life, the fight against Kavanaugh was as predictable as its conclusion.
There is plenty of fighting him that has been full of crazy. Let's start with setting up a fake sexual assault story and then having Democrat leaders sit on it until the last second in the hopes the combination of doubt and late timing will be enough to derail his nomination. Your #metoo Democrat leaders just showed they don't give a f*uck about abuse victims other than how they can use them to their advantage.
Then you have a bunch of #metoo-ers protesting acting like Kavanaugh was the man that raped all of them. The mental illness there is obvious. Nevermind taking each claim on it's individual merits, let's burn him at the stake because some 55 year old claims he did something in high school even after the only evidence we have all proves he didn't do it. Let's call anyone that support Kavanaugh a rapist or rape defender because of this. THAT is some mental illness right there.
Reasonable would be arguing against his confirmation based on his prior work as a judge. But the Democrats didn't feel they could win on reasonable so they went the Saul Alinsky route.
I happen to believe Dr. Ford. I certainly haven't seen anything that disproves her accusations. And I think Kavanaugh clearly lied under oath when he said he never blacked out. Fuck man, I've blacked out plenty, especially in my late high-school and college-aged days. So I have no judgement on him for that. But the issue is that he lied under oath, which as we saw with Clinton, can be a bigger deal than the actual thing you are lying about.
As for them being "my" #metoo Democrat leaders, that's just laughable. I don't vote democrat. I have no delusions that the democrats give a flying fuck about Dr. Ford, women who want abortions, myself, Americans or anything other than their own power. Hypothetically, let's say Ford's accusations are true. Do I think the Democrats would try to maximize that in a way that they think has the best chance to stop a Kavanaugh confirmation? Of course. I think they'd step on a new born baby if it would give them a jump in the polls. So of course they would use a rape victim to their advantage. I also have no doubts they would use a fake rape victim to their advantage. That's politics in 2018: two sides of the same party, fighting a zero-sum game for the margins.
But when you have three accusations of rape against you, then its time for an investigation. And if that investigation happens to overlap an election, thats too fucking bad. Just win in the election and its a non-issue and then prosecute the accusers for perjury. The FBI having a week to talk to four people and produce a report kept under lock and key and only visible to one person at a time like some inner sanctum of Solomon's temple, is not a real investigation.
Just use this to rile up your base, win in November, and the democrats would have nothing to say. Lord knows they suck at winning elections, it shouldn't be hard, especially in a midterm. But now that the republicans have ramrodded Kavanaugh in, the democrats will probably win both houses. I won't be voting for them, but people will.
Of course, as I mentioned before, the democrats would have been plenty capable of stopping Kavanaugh, had they not short-sightedly shot themselves in the foot by eliminating the fillibuster. But that's to be expected. They are too short-sighted and arrogant to be any good at politics.