
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
One might wonder how this meme can't be retired after something like four years, but we can all see why it remains necessary.


-
- Posts: 28382
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Or more, according to her own claims, it's trains of guys.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:56 pm Doing two chicks is exhausting. It has to be even more so for a chick to bang two dudes.
This one sounds like a real trooper, though.
PLATA O PLOMO

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Unless they are going to take turns, there are only three slots.C-Mag wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 2:04 pmOr more, according to her own claims, it's trains of guys.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:56 pm Doing two chicks is exhausting. It has to be even more so for a chick to bang two dudes.
This one sounds like a real trooper, though.
I bet by her fifties, her vagina and asshole are gaping wounds.
-
- Posts: 28382
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
This is what I was referring toKath wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:57 pmWhat's ironic? That I'm consistent in my thinking, without needing the letter next to the name to figure out my opinion?C-Mag wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:51 pm
I'm not calling you a hypocrite. I'm embracing freedom of sexuality for Swetnick. She shouldn't be distancing herself from gang bangs, but embracing it, supporting other Nasty Women...…………………….. it's the only way to be free of the White Patriarchy.
C-Mag wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:31 am
I get it Kath, but it's pretty ironic that you'd bring that up when that is exactly what they are attempting to do to the Kavanator.
PLATA O PLOMO

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Uh...………………………….C-Mag wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 2:08 pm
Do you want to be held accountable now for every bat-shit crazy stuff you did in the 80's?

[/quote]
Still not getting the irony. That's my point. What's ironic? Did you even read my FB post? I clearly told everyone I don't believe her story. Geezuz...
Your opinion of what I think is not, in any way, related to what I actually think. Go over in the corner with DSL until you can stop pretending to know what I think.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You are lying, you stare nothing factually you debate with Cappy, it is there in black and white. Anytime you want to stop lying would be welcome. You can try to bury it in post after post saying that ain't really you, but there it is. Yes, Kath your denials are a joke.Kath wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 11:47 amWhen I state, factually, that our Congress is filled with criminals, is that my support? Nope.clubgop wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 11:09 am
You are lying, you defended the process in an argument with Cappy. Did Cappy make you do that? Is that his fault? You know exactly what you did. Undercover hack so desperate to not be called out, well too bad so sad. We got the record.
Stating, factually, that 60 were needed to pass was not an opinion.
1+1 = 2 = well, that's just your opinion, man.
Is this a joke?
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Liars gotta lie. You need me to have said I'm against Gorsuch so much that you lie. Quote me saying I want Gorsuch denied the seat. So far, you've posted me saying you need 60 to confirm. That's all you've got.clubgop wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 2:28 pm
You are lying, you stare nothing factually you debate with Cappy, it is there in black and white. Anytime you want to stop lying would be welcome. You can try to bury it in post after post saying that ain't really you, but there it is. Yes, Kath your denials are a joke.
A fact is not the same as an opinion.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I got you supporting the filibuster. If that were upheld Gorsuch would not be on the court. Thats what I said, that's what you did. End of discussion. Anytime you want to stop lying or moving the goalpost that would be great.Kath wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 2:32 pmLiars gotta lie. You need me to have said I'm against Gorsuch so much that you lie. Quote me saying I want Gorsuch denied the seat. So far, you've posted me saying you need 60 to confirm. That's all you've got.clubgop wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 2:28 pm
You are lying, you stare nothing factually you debate with Cappy, it is there in black and white. Anytime you want to stop lying would be welcome. You can try to bury it in post after post saying that ain't really you, but there it is. Yes, Kath your denials are a joke.
A fact is not the same as an opinion.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
That has been the confession of many a reformed college slut.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:56 pm Doing two chicks is exhausting. It has to be even more so for a chick to bang two dudes.
This one sounds like a real trooper, though.
-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Lindsey Graham save us from all these degenerate boomers and gen x'rs