Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:29 am

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:22 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:15 am
Oh wow. Deep State op is unraveling fast.

https://truepundit.com/dr-fords-school- ... ld-office/
Yep, that's why they are moving on to Trump Taxes...…………. who knows, we could back on Russian Bots by the end of the week :lol:

Feinstein and the Dems are going to leave Ms Ford by the side of the road, she for the rest of her life will be looked at in question on whether she was making it up, people will know her as someone willing to bend or massage the truth. Swetnick will be left revealed as having a gang rape fetish to the world. :clap: :clap: :clap: Nice work Dems, way to look out for the welfare of women.

They are getting exposed here, badly.

Blasey-Ford it turns out runs Standord's CIA internship program. These people are all connected to the deep state, including this friend she allegedly coached to cheat a polygraph. The deep state managed to erase her criminal record only days before Kavenaugh was officially nominated, and quickly began scrubbing her Internet profile.

All of these people, including Kavenaugh, are garbage.

The only thing Kavenaugh has going for him in my opinion is the fact that the deep state went after him specifically and not Gorsuch. Gorsuch seems less likely their guy, and they apparently have similar ops in planning stages for all potential nominees. Why Kavenaugh?

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28256
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:31 am

Kath wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:24 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:20 am

This is what I was talking about. She does not even process the double standard.
Like when I criticize my friends for being crickets while Clinton was accused versus the faux outrage of today? That sort of double standard?

Again with you not reading my posts. The demons in your head are not qualified to know how I think.
I get it Kath, but it's pretty ironic that you'd bring that up when that is exactly what they are attempting to do to the Kavanator.

The Occams Razor is something probably happened to Ford and they filled in the blank face with Kavanaugh because it was politically expedient, and Swetnick has a fetish that perhaps today is embarrassing for her.

Listen, I've got no probably with Swetnick getting all her orfices filled by a train of guys because she likes it. She should be a stronger woman and just admit she loves it.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28256
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:32 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:29 am
C-Mag wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:22 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:15 am
Oh wow. Deep State op is unraveling fast.

https://truepundit.com/dr-fords-school- ... ld-office/
Yep, that's why they are moving on to Trump Taxes...…………. who knows, we could back on Russian Bots by the end of the week :lol:

Feinstein and the Dems are going to leave Ms Ford by the side of the road, she for the rest of her life will be looked at in question on whether she was making it up, people will know her as someone willing to bend or massage the truth. Swetnick will be left revealed as having a gang rape fetish to the world. :clap: :clap: :clap: Nice work Dems, way to look out for the welfare of women.

They are getting exposed here, badly.

Blasey-Ford it turns out runs Standord's CIA internship program. These people are all connected to the deep state, including this friend she allegedly coached to cheat a polygraph. The deep state managed to erase her criminal record only days before Kavenaugh was officially nominated, and quickly began scrubbing her Internet profile.

All of these people, including Kavenaugh, are garbage.

The only thing Kavenaugh has going for him in my opinion is the fact that the deep state went after him specifically and not Gorsuch. Gorsuch seems less likely their guy, and they apparently have similar ops in planning stages for all potential nominees. Why Kavenaugh?
It could very well be that Brennan has loyalists in the CIA as described by the NY Times and they are deeply involved in setting this up. It would fit Brennans pattern.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Kath » Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:35 am

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:31 am

I get it Kath, but it's pretty ironic that you'd bring that up when that is exactly what they are attempting to do to the Kavanator.
?? Not sure what you are talking about. I am telling you that my lefty FB friends think I'm far right wing. I posted a very recent discussion I had with one of them about this. It's not all there - it's an 80 or 90 response FB thread. The portions I am showing are representative of the entire conversation. Show me my double standard?


Image
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:42 am

Kath wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 5:24 am
clubgop wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 5:22 am


I got endless quotes of you doing so arguing with St Capps for that very thing from this thread. You are lying. You know why people call you an undercover hack? Because you do shit like this.
Again, all you need to do is quote me saying that I don't like Gorsuch and I want him filibustered. That should be easy. You haven't shown me discussing anything but process so far.
Process is all that matters. Stop trying to move the goalpost. That is undercover hack bitch behavior. You got caught, its ok, face up to the truth, 2017 Kath is gone now, she doesn't have to come back, you don't have to defend her anymore.

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Kath » Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:47 am

clubgop wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:42 am


Process is all that matters. Stop trying to move the goalpost. That is undercover hack bitch behavior. You got caught, its ok, face up to the truth, 2017 Kath is gone now, she doesn't have to come back, you don't have to defend her anymore.
So, accurately stating they needed eight dems (before McConnell went nuclear) to get to sixty was my opinion? Hmmmm.

So when I state things like "Hurricane Irma tore down our last Coconut Palm," that was an opinion I was making about hurricanes?

Weird. I thought an opinion was the opposite of a fact. To you, I guess, they are one and the same.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:57 am

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:34 am
PartyOf5 wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:30 am
C-Mag wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:08 am
Ms Ford lied to Congress during testimony when she played dumb about polygraphs

She in fact coached a friend on polygraphs years previous.
Yet it gets buried by our MSM. 99% of Americans have no idea the Gateway Pundit even exists. Go to Google news or Yahoo news and it's nowhere to be seen. Instead we get pages upon pages every day from garbage sources telling us how Swetnik needs to be heard and how he's not fit to be a judge because he showed legit outrage when having to defend himself against crap like this. The whole MSM is the Onion to me, but it's sad because to a large percentage they are still the source of truth.
Swetnick is the least credible of all of them. With what I've read of her own words it appears to me that at a minimum she was at least enjoying being a voyeaur of gang rape sex scenarios if not enjoying being an actual participant.

Fact is you can't trust the MSM to give you a broad perspective of any news.
It's what they want they want the most salacious details out so they can tell this tale.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Wed Oct 03, 2018 11:05 am

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:22 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:15 am
Oh wow. Deep State op is unraveling fast.

https://truepundit.com/dr-fords-school- ... ld-office/
Yep, that's why they are moving on to Trump Taxes...…………. who knows, we could back on Russian Bots by the end of the week :lol:

Feinstein and the Dems are going to leave Ms Ford by the side of the road, she for the rest of her life will be looked at in question on whether she was making it up, people will know her as someone willing to bend or massage the truth. Swetnick will be left revealed as having a gang rape fetish to the world. :clap: :clap: :clap: Nice work Dems, way to look out for the welfare of women.
For the MSM that is fine the 20-30% that slavishly believe everything they put out will eat all of it up and place under K for Kavanaugh. For Sweatnik and Avenatti do not prosecute them publicly, by all means if you can nail them, nail them, but don't give those 2 what they crave, attention.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Oct 03, 2018 11:06 am

Boyfriend's allegation actually checks out. Turns out this chick was career FBI and took a pygraph right when he said she did. She also helped create that letter from other students to corroborate Blasey-Ford's character.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... construct/


What a fucking farce.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Wed Oct 03, 2018 11:09 am

Kath wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:47 am
clubgop wrote:
Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:42 am


Process is all that matters. Stop trying to move the goalpost. That is undercover hack bitch behavior. You got caught, its ok, face up to the truth, 2017 Kath is gone now, she doesn't have to come back, you don't have to defend her anymore.
So, accurately stating they needed eight dems (before McConnell went nuclear) to get to sixty was my opinion? Hmmmm.

So when I state things like "Hurricane Irma tore down our last Coconut Palm," that was an opinion I was making about hurricanes?

Weird. I thought an opinion was the opposite of a fact. To you, I guess, they are one and the same.
You are lying, you defended the process in an argument with Cappy. Did Cappy make you do that? Is that his fault? You know exactly what you did. Undercover hack so desperate to not be called out, well too bad so sad. We got the record.