History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
Cornwell's Thomas of Hookton trilogy is a good introduction to the HYW despite also being a work of fiction. It was what initially got me interested in the period and the wonderful weapon that is the longbow.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
Apart from its shock value coming from the noise and smoke the cannons at Crecy were not actually very efficient. Only a handful were present and compared to the longbow their impact was negligable.katarn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 6:58 amAh yes, because the established scriptures of the Church made castles obsolete. Words of light melting the hearth of stone? .Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Oct 02, 2018 8:56 pmEventually, after 80 years of losing battle after battle.
Wasn't god or Joan that finally got rid of us either, it was the development of bloody canons making castles obsolete.
In a more serious reply, yeah. Ironic though, isn't it, that the English campaign containing Crecy is one of if not the earliest use of cannons in Europe, yet the English used cannons and guns less than the French who adopted them later? Just like the war in general, talk about not following through.
Too bad I really prefer the English side of that whole war though-- it makes this more a charade for humor than an argument.
The early cannons could only fire once or twice a day due to the fact they had to pack the barrel with clay and wait for it to set as the cannon balls were a very poor fit to the bore of the guns. Black powder was also in very short supply.
Once the English were established in their castles around France cannons became more useful to the French as a method of breaching walls and gates but not much use for the defenders against the besieging forces. They didn't become a powerful anti-personnel weapon until much later.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:30 pm
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
Absolutely. I'm only poking fun because that war was pretty well won until some peasant girl came and revived the French, who somehow then won back their land in the end.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:09 amApart from its shock value coming from the noise and smoke the cannons at Crecy were not actually very efficient. Only a handful were present and compared to the longbow their impact was negligable.katarn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 6:58 amAh yes, because the established scriptures of the Church made castles obsolete. Words of light melting the hearth of stone? .Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Oct 02, 2018 8:56 pm
Eventually, after 80 years of losing battle after battle.
Wasn't god or Joan that finally got rid of us either, it was the development of bloody canons making castles obsolete.
In a more serious reply, yeah. Ironic though, isn't it, that the English campaign containing Crecy is one of if not the earliest use of cannons in Europe, yet the English used cannons and guns less than the French who adopted them later? Just like the war in general, talk about not following through.
Too bad I really prefer the English side of that whole war though-- it makes this more a charade for humor than an argument.
The early cannons could only fire once or twice a day due to the fact they had to pack the barrel with clay and wait for it to set as the cannon balls were a very poor fit to the bore of the guns. Black powder was also in very short supply.
Once the English were established in their castles around France cannons became more useful to the French as a method of breaching walls and gates but not much use for the defenders against the besieging forces. They didn't become a powerful anti-personnel weapon until much later.
"Stone walls do not a prison make, nor iron bars a cage...
If I have freedom in my love
And in my soul am free,
Angels alone that soar above
Enjoy such Liberty" - Richard Lovelace
If I have freedom in my love
And in my soul am free,
Angels alone that soar above
Enjoy such Liberty" - Richard Lovelace
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
The English are now reclaiming Aquitaine, Gascony and Normandy one house at a time.
In the Lot region in the Dordogne over 70% of houses coming up for sale are bought by the British. I even have my own little part of France not too far from where Edward III won his glorious victory at Poitiers in 1356.
In the Lot region in the Dordogne over 70% of houses coming up for sale are bought by the British. I even have my own little part of France not too far from where Edward III won his glorious victory at Poitiers in 1356.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 2988
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
Since there are way more Frenchmen than Brits why is it that they are selling their property to foreigners?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:34 amThe English are now reclaiming Aquitaine, Gascony and Normandy one house at a time.
In the Lot region in the Dordogne over 70% of houses coming up for sale are bought by the British. I even have my own little part of France not too far from where Edward III won his glorious victory at Poitiers in 1356.
Is the English more wealthy / excess cash etc. than the French per capita?
The good, the true, & the beautiful
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
The French youth don't want to live in houses in the countryside they want apartments in towns near to where the jobs are. As a result houses are really cheap, really really cheap compared to the UK. My little house with its acre of land would be worth nearly ten times as much if it were here in Suffolk rather than stuck in the middle of a rather uninteresting (unless you like castles) agricultural area in central France.GloryofGreece wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:39 amSince there are way more Frenchmen than Brits why is it that they are selling their property to foreigners?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:34 amThe English are now reclaiming Aquitaine, Gascony and Normandy one house at a time.
In the Lot region in the Dordogne over 70% of houses coming up for sale are bought by the British. I even have my own little part of France not too far from where Edward III won his glorious victory at Poitiers in 1356.
Is the English more wealthy / excess cash etc. than the French per capita?
Houses in the south of France near the med' or in Brittany on the English channel are much more expensive.
A mate of mine lived in a tiny ex chestnut drying shed in a forest half way up a mountain not far from Marseille in the south which was worth over 100k. In the area where my house is you can buy a 10 bedroom chateau with 20 acres and a lake for the same money.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 2988
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
Most of France is beautiful. I envy you.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:57 amThe French youth don't want to live in houses in the countryside they want apartments in towns near to where the jobs are. As a result houses are really cheap, really really cheap compared to the UK. My little house with its acre of land would be worth nearly ten times as much if it were here in Suffolk rather than stuck in the middle of a rather uninteresting (unless you like castles) agricultural area in central France.GloryofGreece wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:39 amSince there are way more Frenchmen than Brits why is it that they are selling their property to foreigners?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:34 amThe English are now reclaiming Aquitaine, Gascony and Normandy one house at a time.
In the Lot region in the Dordogne over 70% of houses coming up for sale are bought by the British. I even have my own little part of France not too far from where Edward III won his glorious victory at Poitiers in 1356.
Is the English more wealthy / excess cash etc. than the French per capita?
Houses in the south of France near the med' or in Brittany on the English channel are much more expensive.
A mate of mine lived in a tiny ex chestnut drying shed in a forest half way up a mountain not far from Marseille in the south which was worth over 100k. In the area where my house is you can buy a 10 bedroom chateau with 20 acres and a lake for the same money.
The good, the true, & the beautiful
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
Hoping to get out there for a month this winter. The garden needs some work and I need to put some poison down to reduce the population of doormice living in the roof.GloryofGreece wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 12:32 pmMost of France is beautiful. I envy you.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:57 amThe French youth don't want to live in houses in the countryside they want apartments in towns near to where the jobs are. As a result houses are really cheap, really really cheap compared to the UK. My little house with its acre of land would be worth nearly ten times as much if it were here in Suffolk rather than stuck in the middle of a rather uninteresting (unless you like castles) agricultural area in central France.GloryofGreece wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:39 am
Since there are way more Frenchmen than Brits why is it that they are selling their property to foreigners?
Is the English more wealthy / excess cash etc. than the French per capita?
Houses in the south of France near the med' or in Brittany on the English channel are much more expensive.
A mate of mine lived in a tiny ex chestnut drying shed in a forest half way up a mountain not far from Marseille in the south which was worth over 100k. In the area where my house is you can buy a 10 bedroom chateau with 20 acres and a lake for the same money.
The village my house is in is tiny, maybe 50 houses and a small castle. However, once a month 10,000 people descend on it for France's largest outdoor market.
You can buy anything from livestock to frilly underwear.
One stall contains only shallots with dozens of differently sized, shaped and coloured varieties.
Next to it is the garlic stall, again there are more varieties of garlic than I ever knew existed.
It's a great place for a chef like me to wander around.
Would be like TC coming across a shop that sells 50 different types of burgers.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 2988
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
Part II is out for contributors and will be out for free download soon. Wonder how much he regularly makes from pay pal/patreon donations monthly?
The good, the true, & the beautiful
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: History on Fire: Joan of Arc / Hundred Years War
The longbow is a great weapon. That novel was highly fictionalized, though.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:56 amCornwell's Thomas of Hookton trilogy is a good introduction to the HYW despite also being a work of fiction. It was what initially got me interested in the period and the wonderful weapon that is the longbow.
Another good novel for this period is actually Michael Chrichton's Timeline. The novel has a lot of detail about the period in it. The film is garbage. I am not talking about that.