Trump's SCOTUS

[C-Mag]

US GDP approx $19 trillion
US National Debt $21. 4 trillion

The US government has over-spent by an amount greater than the nation produces in a year - but the problem is we aren’t taxed enough.

Martin’s a taxer.
Too bad taxing ALL of our productivity at a 100% tax rate still wouldn’t cover his government’s spending.

If only the rich paid their “fair share”.
Hahahahahahh
Whoo!

Martin says just print mo money...………….. can't go wrong.

[Haumana]

ITT: people on team republican tell an independent that there is no such thing

Yeah, that was what was in this thread. Being independent is a luxury that is quickly disappearing was the gist.

I ran as a Democrat for the U.S. House of Representatives. I've been a Democrat for 42 years, and will remain one until Dems adopt socialism in their platform, which I expect them to do by 2020, at which point I will be #walkaway, but I'm not going to the Republicans, they won't have me because I'm a Taxer. There's no place to go for Liberal OWGs. I can only hope that Trump (in the form of Republicans) defeats Democrats so bad in the Midterms that they have to return to sanity, but I don't think that's going to happen because there's a war between The Patriarchy and The Matriarchy embodied in the Parties, and women, minorities & socialists never had it so good.

Choosing Trump shouldn't be confused with choosing Republicans. I am a stick in the spokes guy. I didn't get a choice in what that stick was but when the opportunity arose I took it. I would have preferred the Perot stick back in the day but that wasn't to be.

[Martin Hash]

I've always clearly stated I was a Trump guy, NOT a Republican.

[Martin Hash]

US GDP approx $19 trillion
US National Debt $21. 4 trillion

The US government has over-spent by an amount greater than the nation produces in a year - but the problem is we aren’t taxed enough.

Martin’s a taxer.
Too bad taxing ALL of our productivity at a 100% tax rate still wouldn’t cover his government’s spending.

If only the rich paid their “fair share”.
Hahahahahahh
Whoo!

Martin says just print mo money...………….. can't go wrong.

Make me Money Czar, I totally grok it; apparently, nobody else does. (Comes with being the Wysest Myn in the Wyrld.)

p.s. How many times do I have to say this: money ain't the problem, the Nouveau Aristocracy is.

[Kath]

Your point= you have no dog in the fight.

You haven't yet told me which party represents my interests. Which team has made a sincere effort to address my top issues? (Citations needed.) I've posted my main issues, twice, now. That's my dog. I want more freedom, less government, less spending, etc.

The two parties agree 100% on these issues, and their views are in no way, the interest of the citizenry. Voting for corruption, overspending & more government is, well, voting for corruption, overspending & more government. You can support that if those things are not important to you, but I vote in MY best interests, not yours.

[Martin Hash]

Personally, I'm a liberty guy above all else. That means whatever other things I want, liberty comes first. The Marxists are by far the biggest threat to liberty. Once liberty is safe (also watch out for the oligarchy), I'll go to #2 on my list.

[clubgop]

Now we're stuck with this circus clown for 30-40 years because both teams fucked up.

Why couldn't he nominate another Gorsuch?

Gorsuch over Kavanaugh but how is one a swamp creature the other not?

One to Yale the other Harvard by way of Columbia. Both clerked for Kennedy on the Supreme court. One was a Whitehouse staffer the other an associate with a powerful DC law firm, read, lobbyist. That same president GWB nominate them to district appeals courts, go thru Senate confirmation without incident. You got to ask yourself what makes one a swamp creature the other not?

[Kath]

Personally, I'm a liberty guy above all else. That means whatever other things I want, liberty comes first. The Marxists are by far the biggest threat to liberty. Once liberty is safe (also watch out for the oligarchy), I'll go to #2 on my list.

We don't currently have much liberty. We are "allowed" to do some things, but make no mistake, no party has any interest in our liberties.

[C-Mag]

I just heard on the radio that Swetnicks Lawyer was questioned why a college girl was going to high school gang rape parties repeatedly, the lawyer said because she was researching them.

Well, if that's the case where's the documentation ? Where's the prof who signed off on the project? What class was it for? Was her participation research ?

[Kath]

Gorsuch over Kavanaugh but how is one a swamp creature the other not?

One believes that our rights should come from government. The other does not.
One wants to tear the 4th to shreds. The other does not.

Etc.

I tend to listen to Judge Napolitano on these things. I find him quite rational.