Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You'd be charged for lying to the authorities, bare minimum.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
She seems crazy.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I think the jails are not full of false accusers, because I don’t think false accusation is easy to prove. I could falsely accuse anyone of assaulting me at a gas station 30 years ago. Even if you managed to prove your whereabouts and therefore your innocence I could just say “Well, that’s how I remember it. I guess I could be wrong, but to my recollection you were the assailant”.
Did I falsely accuse you, or mistakenly accuse the wrong person?
I’m not going to jail for being wrong.
/shrug
Did I falsely accuse you, or mistakenly accuse the wrong person?
I’m not going to jail for being wrong.
/shrug
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You are confused about what the state must prove.
The state did not have to prove Martha Stewart knowingly committed insider trading in order to lock her up for lying to the police. They needed only to prove her statements to law enforcement contained lies.
We already know this woman's statements are packed with lies, such as "I cannot fly in airplanes", such and such persons were present at the party, etc.
If you lied to the authorities they would charge you. But when women lie about sexual assault to ruin men or gain advantages in various things, they get a free pass. Suddenly it's very difficult to prove somebody lied.
Tell that to Martha Stewart.
The state did not have to prove Martha Stewart knowingly committed insider trading in order to lock her up for lying to the police. They needed only to prove her statements to law enforcement contained lies.
We already know this woman's statements are packed with lies, such as "I cannot fly in airplanes", such and such persons were present at the party, etc.
If you lied to the authorities they would charge you. But when women lie about sexual assault to ruin men or gain advantages in various things, they get a free pass. Suddenly it's very difficult to prove somebody lied.
Tell that to Martha Stewart.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Apparently you have secret knowledge that the rest of the legal, judicial, and prosecutorial professions lack. You should probably go educate them so they can get better at doing their jobs.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
My secret knowledge is a fucked experience of having to REPEATEDLY prove a woman was lying (proving my innocence instead of the other way around) and then watching that bitch free to walk out of court every God damned time to repeat it again in 30 days with some new baseless allegation.
Fuck this shit. Men like you are the problem because you enable this behavior. These women deserve to be prosecuted no differently than you or I would be prosecuted for lying to the authorities. Perjury is a fucking crime. It's not just a crime when men do it, and falsely accusing a man of attempted violent rape is WORSE than being raped.
They are supposed to be held to the same standard as men and they are not. YOU are not doing it right here. No fucking way would you take that line if this were a man.
Fuck this shit. Men like you are the problem because you enable this behavior. These women deserve to be prosecuted no differently than you or I would be prosecuted for lying to the authorities. Perjury is a fucking crime. It's not just a crime when men do it, and falsely accusing a man of attempted violent rape is WORSE than being raped.
They are supposed to be held to the same standard as men and they are not. YOU are not doing it right here. No fucking way would you take that line if this were a man.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Right, I’m the reason the courts think your kid is better off with what you describe as a psychotic, drug addicted, ex-stripper. Im sure you had nothing to do with any of that, and my complete non-involvement made all the difference.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:38 amMen like you are the problem because you enable this behavior.
“This court has decided, based on the complete absence of some forum user named DBTrek, that the druggie stripper is the more fit parent.”
Get a grip.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
DBTrek wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:44 amRight, I’m the reason the courts think your kid is better off with what you describe as a psychotic, drug addicted, ex-stripper. Im sure you had nothing to do with any of that, and my complete non-involvement made all the difference.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:38 amMen like you are the problem because you enable this behavior.
“This court has decided, based on the complete absence of some forum user named DBTrek, that the druggie stripper is the more fit parent.”
Get a grip.
That's the way to win an argument, genius. Be the asshole you are famous for being.
YOU are the one opining how we cannot possibly prove this woman lied when YES WE FUCKING CAN! She lied. She lied about being afraid to fly when she said she couldn't come out to testify. But she just admitted to being a world traveler! She's fucking lying over and over, man. Holy fuck you are delusional.
Every witness she named says she is lying, dude. That's enough for them to prosecute. If you tell the police one thing, name some witnesses, and then those witnesses contradict you, guess what the fuck happens, genius.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 18728
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
StA, this Kavanaugh shit has pushed you too far. Regroup, ignore it until it’s over, and post about something else.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change