Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Honestly, I would probably never hire anybody who went to Harvard or Yale. Those two universities in particular operate on connections rather than merit and, frankly, their academic programs lately are total bullshit.
Let them run their own program, with their own connected networks, and let the real business of America carry on without them and for the better.
Consider how many of our nation's problem can be traced back to those two dumpster fires.
Are other Ivy League schools pumping out cancer at that rate? Nope. University of Chicago is not burning the nation down. That is just Harvard and Yale.
Let them run their own program, with their own connected networks, and let the real business of America carry on without them and for the better.
Consider how many of our nation's problem can be traced back to those two dumpster fires.
Are other Ivy League schools pumping out cancer at that rate? Nope. University of Chicago is not burning the nation down. That is just Harvard and Yale.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
pineapplemike wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:02 am
i believe fife has made a few posts explaining that kavanaugh is very pro-government surveillance and the vibe of the forum here is that he's a swamp pick
The vibe of the forum is unhinged and hysterical as usual.
Every statement cranked up to level 11 because anything less than maximum intensity is unacceptable.
/shrug
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Jimmy Saville was never convicted of sexual abuse either.DBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:59 amMontegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:56 amIs it MAGA to not care whether your SC pick is a sexual offender so long as an anti abortion supporter gets selected?
Well, we know for a fact Kavanaugh isn’t a sex offender because he has no record. He didn’t even have accusations, until last week.
So the idea that low-info people are already calling the guy a “sex offender” is just further proof that the average bear probably shouldn’t be voting.
It would be pretty low info to suggest that he wasn't a sexual offender.
Let's hope he gets his day in court so a jury can decide.
Not caring whether he is guilty or not so long as you get an anti abortion pro 2nd amendment judge on the SC is a shitty double standard.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
There will be no day in court because there have been no charges filed. Derp.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:29 am
Jimmy Saville was never convicted of sexual abuse either.
It would be pretty low info to suggest that he wasn't a sexual offender.
Let's hope he gets his day in court so a jury can decide.
Not caring whether he is guilty or not so long as you get an anti abortion pro 2nd amendment judge on the SC is a shitty double standard.
We have as much evidence of Kavanaugh being a sex offender as we have of you being a pedophile (aka an accusation from an unsupported source). If that’s enough to sway your opinion and label people “sex offenders” it’s time for you to turn yourself in and be put on the registry. Do let us know when you’ve held yourself to your own standard.
/shrug
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Neither were you convicted, so does that make Clubby right when he accused you of it?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:29 amJimmy Saville was never convicted of sexual abuse either.DBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:59 amMontegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:56 amIs it MAGA to not care whether your SC pick is a sexual offender so long as an anti abortion supporter gets selected?
Well, we know for a fact Kavanaugh isn’t a sex offender because he has no record. He didn’t even have accusations, until last week.
So the idea that low-info people are already calling the guy a “sex offender” is just further proof that the average bear probably shouldn’t be voting.
It would be pretty low info to suggest that he wasn't a sexual offender.
Let's hope he gets his day in court so a jury can decide.
Not caring whether he is guilty or not so long as you get an anti abortion pro 2nd amendment judge on the SC is a shitty double standard.
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:29 amNot caring whether he is guilty or not so long as you get an anti abortion pro 2nd amendment judge on the SC is a shitty double standard.
It's not a double standard anymore - the DNC went scorched earth. Or is it only a double standard when the Right pulls bull shit?
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The consistency of the left - if you’re accused of sex crimes then you’re guilty. If we’re accused then we’re the real victims, and the system is trying to silence us.
The level of self-deception it must take to function like that in your daily life. Wow.
The level of self-deception it must take to function like that in your daily life. Wow.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Two women have come forward to make accusations so far. If that doesn't lead at least to an investigation there is something rotten going on.DBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:38 amThere will be no day in court because there have been no charges filed. Derp.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:29 am
Jimmy Saville was never convicted of sexual abuse either.
It would be pretty low info to suggest that he wasn't a sexual offender.
Let's hope he gets his day in court so a jury can decide.
Not caring whether he is guilty or not so long as you get an anti abortion pro 2nd amendment judge on the SC is a shitty double standard.
We have as much evidence of Kavanaugh being a sex offender as we have of you being a pedophile (aka an accusation from an unsupported source). If that’s enough to sway your opinion and label people “sex offenders” it’s time for you to turn yourself in and be put on the registry. Do let us know when you’ve held yourself to your own standard.
/shrug
Did Cuntflop ever accuse me off sexually assaulting him personally or are you confusing allegations with baseless insults?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Sorry, I don’t talk to sex offenders. Please leave.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Lolz - man - two uncorroborated women have come forward at the last minute (one of whom was admittedly sought out by the DNC) when the FEDs and DNC have had months to vet this candidate...you know this...we know you know this...yet you don't seem to care about these points....wonder why?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:46 amTwo women have come forward to make accusations so far. If that doesn't lead at least to an investigation there is something rotten going on.DBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:38 amThere will be no day in court because there have been no charges filed. Derp.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:29 am
Jimmy Saville was never convicted of sexual abuse either.
It would be pretty low info to suggest that he wasn't a sexual offender.
Let's hope he gets his day in court so a jury can decide.
Not caring whether he is guilty or not so long as you get an anti abortion pro 2nd amendment judge on the SC is a shitty double standard.
We have as much evidence of Kavanaugh being a sex offender as we have of you being a pedophile (aka an accusation from an unsupported source). If that’s enough to sway your opinion and label people “sex offenders” it’s time for you to turn yourself in and be put on the registry. Do let us know when you’ve held yourself to your own standard.
/shrug
Did Cuntflop ever accuse me off sexually assaulting him personally or are you confusing allegations with baseless insults?