Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:48 am

pineapplemike wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:46 am
anyone else here that would not be at all surprised to find a 17/18/19/whatever year old brett kavanaugh was indeed responsible for the accused acts? anyone else here that would also be ok with him still sitting on the supreme court after that fact? besides me

4th amendment issues aside
Not at all. My opinion of people like him is that they are absolute garbage.

Which includes the accuser, by the way.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18667
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:52 am

Dude, if you’re going to be held to the standards of yourself at 17; when you couldn’t vote, drink, join the military, or get married. When, I bet, you were still a virgin, and had only been masturbating for a few years; if that’s the person you will forever be held accountable for, you’re a sorry represention of the human race.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:54 am

How many John McCains and George W. Bushes must America endure before everybody realizes these are garbage people?

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:55 am

pineapplemike wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:46 am
anyone else here that would not be at all surprised to find a 17/18/19/whatever year old brett kavanaugh was indeed responsible for the accused acts? anyone else here that would also be ok with him still sitting on the supreme court after that fact? besides me

4th amendment issues aside
Nope, nope, what 4th amendment issues?

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:56 am

Is it MAGA to not care whether your SC pick is a sexual offender so long as an anti abortion supporter gets selected?
Seems like some shitty double standards.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:57 am

Martin Hash wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:52 am
Dude, if you’re going to be held to the standards of yourself at 17; when you couldn’t vote, drink, join the military, or get married. When, I bet, you were still a virgin, and had only been masturbating for a few years; if that’s the person you will forever be held accountable for, you’re a sorry represention of the human race.
I am fucking held accountable for shit I did at that age. I had to go through SCI clearance like every other non-rich American with no political connections.

Seriously, fuck that guy.

Did your daddy put you in an expensive prep school, pull strings to cover up your misdeeds, and then write a check so you can go to Yale?

Dude, you achieved wealth and success on your own merit. Kavennaugh is not your equal.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:58 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:56 am
Is it MAGA to not care whether your SC pick is a sexual offender so long as an anti abortion supporter gets selected?
Seems like some shitty double standards.
Prove it and I will want to see him locked up.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18667
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:59 am

Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:59 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:56 am
Is it MAGA to not care whether your SC pick is a sexual offender so long as an anti abortion supporter gets selected?


Well, we know for a fact Kavanaugh isn’t a sex offender because he has no record. He didn’t even have accusations, until last week.

So the idea that low-info people are already calling the guy a “sex offender” is just further proof that the average bear probably shouldn’t be voting.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by pineapplemike » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:02 am

clubgop wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:55 am
Nope, nope, what 4th amendment issues?
i believe fife has made a few posts explaining that kavanaugh is very pro-government surveillance and the vibe of the forum here is that he's a swamp pick
Montegriffo wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:56 am
Is it MAGA to not care whether your SC pick is a sexual offender so long as an anti abortion supporter gets selected?
Seems like some shitty double standards.
i'm more willing to look the other way on the accusations in favor of having another pro-2nd amendment judge than i am to have another anti-abortion judge. whether or not one should be tarred and feathered with a SEXUAL OFFENDER label for what seem to be minor incidents is another story