SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 3:54 pmI think you’ll find that the women from the losing side in a war do not fare well. Definitely not “married up” with the conquerors.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 3:42 pmBecause if her batshit criticism were legitimate then who the hell is she to level it??pineapplemike wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 3:37 pmwhy does kathy griffin have to have served for her criticisms to be legitimate? is that relevant, necessarily?
People who choose not to serve do not have any ground to criticize others who choose not to serve. It's the dumbest fucking thing in the world. If a man does that, chances are high somebody will reply by asking where he served, and that will shut him right the fuck down. But females don't serve for the most part and they do this shit all the time. They've been doing it for all history, really, but now that they are supposedly our equals and have a fucking vote, then maybe they should be held accountable to the same standards as us?
The problem here is that more than half the electorate votes for politicians who send us to more wars that their entire demographic does not have to fight. War is literally optional for women, and even when we lose, they just marry up with the conquerers. I never heard of a war-husband, have you?
No war brides? LOL
Women were fucking conquerers in WW2 like crazy, dude. French women were fucking Nazi officers. Then when the tides turned, German women were fucking American soldiers. You even had French women ditching French men and marrying up with Americans and shipping off for America.
Women don't have sympathy for you when you lose. It's just genetic behavior on their part. War brides are a thing precisely for the same reason you can never show any weakness to women.
The one's who didn't fair well were the women who fucked German occupiers only to see their kraut boyfriends get routed and their own men humiliate them in the streets by shaving them bald and marking them as traitors.
