Feminism
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Feminism
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Feminism
Female privilege is the ability to shame Trump for getting a Vietnam War deferment while never having had to serve yourself.
Nobody asks her where she served. She sure as shit votes and she doesn't mind voting for a bitch who wants even more wars, that will send more men to die or get lifelong disabilities. But she's not serving in those wars. She's just shaming other men who don't serve.. Think about that shit. They are more than half the electorate.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... s-take-hisComedian Kathy Griffin went after President Trump for his expression of condolences to Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) family.
“Take his name out of your mouth you piece of shit,” Griffin wrote on Twitter Saturday evening.
“You maligned his military service while you did everything to avoid serving. You attacked him repeatedly while you knew he was dying,” Griffin continued.
“And you cozied up to Putin while he did everything he could to oppose him,” she wrote. “F--- you.”
The president tweeted out his condolences to the McCain family earlier Saturday night.
Nobody asks her where she served. She sure as shit votes and she doesn't mind voting for a bitch who wants even more wars, that will send more men to die or get lifelong disabilities. But she's not serving in those wars. She's just shaming other men who don't serve.. Think about that shit. They are more than half the electorate.
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Feminism
Just curious on when you see Trunp ending any wars.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Feminism
Start a new thread if you want to make a point that has nothing to do with the post (it's obviously stupid, given that he's ended at least one of Obama's wars already).
Fuck off for trying to derail my post too. Cunt.
Fuck off for trying to derail my post too. Cunt.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Feminism
why does kathy griffin have to have served for her criticisms to be legitimate? is that relevant, necessarily?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Feminism
Because if her batshit criticism were legitimate then who the hell is she to level it??pineapplemike wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 3:37 pmwhy does kathy griffin have to have served for her criticisms to be legitimate? is that relevant, necessarily?
People who choose not to serve do not have any ground to criticize others who choose not to serve. It's the dumbest fucking thing in the world. If a man does that, chances are high somebody will reply by asking where he served, and that will shut him right the fuck down. But females don't serve for the most part and they do this shit all the time. They've been doing it for all history, really, but now that they are supposedly our equals and have a fucking vote, then maybe they should be held accountable to the same standards as us?
The problem here is that more than half the electorate votes for politicians who send us to more wars that their entire demographic does not have to fight. War is literally optional for women, and even when we lose, they just marry up with the conquerers. I never heard of a war-husband, have you?
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Feminism
I think you’ll find that the women from the losing side in a war do not fare well. Definitely not “married up” with the conquerors.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 3:42 pmBecause if her batshit criticism were legitimate then who the hell is she to level it??pineapplemike wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 3:37 pmwhy does kathy griffin have to have served for her criticisms to be legitimate? is that relevant, necessarily?
People who choose not to serve do not have any ground to criticize others who choose not to serve. It's the dumbest fucking thing in the world. If a man does that, chances are high somebody will reply by asking where he served, and that will shut him right the fuck down. But females don't serve for the most part and they do this shit all the time. They've been doing it for all history, really, but now that they are supposedly our equals and have a fucking vote, then maybe they should be held accountable to the same standards as us?
The problem here is that more than half the electorate votes for politicians who send us to more wars that their entire demographic does not have to fight. War is literally optional for women, and even when we lose, they just marry up with the conquerers. I never heard of a war-husband, have you?