According to your article he was arrested for failing to disperse and inciting religious hatred.
Churchill said some offensive things about Islam.
Probably not a good idea to repeat some of the things he said about Germans either.
Yes. The left is very adamant about squashing free speech and rewriting history.
I have one for them to start with, seems quite fitting to how they are operating...
Aug 28, 1963, Washington DC
Martin Luther King
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the content of their character but by the color of their skin."
According to your article he was arrested for failing to disperse and inciting religious hatred.
Churchill said some offensive things about Islam.
Probably not a good idea to repeat some of the things he said about Germans either.
Yes. The left is very adamant about squashing free speech and rewriting history.
I have one for them to start with, seems quite fitting to how they are operating...
Aug 28, 1963, Washington DC
Martin Luther King
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the content of their character but by the color of their skin."
Those damned leftist Tories and their Marxist police force
Not just Islam or Germans either...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
These far right activists never drag this old quote up.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
If I remember correctly this campaign was successful and insult was removed from the legislation. Incitement to racial hatred is now the accepted line in the sand.
It is accepted too. Most of the freedom of speech rhetoric comes from abroad.
British society is happy to give up the right to incite racial hatred.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
So you want radical Islamic preachers free to incite hatred of Western civilisation?
You don't see the link between that and mowing down pedestrians on Westminister bridge?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
