-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:02 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:46 pm
I argued against cutting them all off in some grand gesture. Because it would result in mass starvation.
Nancy Pelosi is kicking herself for not including the mass starvation angle.
interviewer: “What about that murdering illegal that just whacked the jogger? Seems like an immigration issue?”
Nancy Pelosi: “Ripping babies from their mothers arms isn’t making us any safer. Nor would starving our citizens to near extinction.”
/game
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14796
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:06 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:46 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:17 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:00 pm
”We all stand with... (what’s her name?)”
“Our country is devastated by the loss of <her> AND YOU PEOPLE DID IT!!!”
Did you not argue for mass migration from Mexico so they would pick your vegitables as wage slave and keep your grocery bills lower?
Well, this was your guy.
I know. You will act shocked now and dispute you ever defended this shit.
No I did not. I argued against cutting them all off in some grand gesture. Because it would result in mass starvation.
But I know you can only think in binary, so sure. SJW open-borders.
Mass starvation for whom?
#NotOneRedCent
-
pineapplemike
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Post
by pineapplemike » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:12 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:50 pm
pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:48 pm
is it wise to determine federal policy based on individual cases? gun grabbers think so, is this a similar situation?
Nope.
Look at the statistics of how much this shit costs Americans in terms of money, economic stagnation, and lives lost.
This case was just the last straw on the camel's back it would seem.
i've seen people arguing for both, that illegal immigration is a huge burden on the taxpayer, and that it isn't a huge burden on the taxpayer. send me some links for your side
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:17 pm
You need links to understand how 13 million people using your infrastructure, emergency healthcare services, judicial system, school system, and natural resources is a burden on the taxpayer?
For real?
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:18 pm
pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:12 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:50 pm
pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:48 pm
is it wise to determine federal policy based on individual cases? gun grabbers think so, is this a similar situation?
Nope.
Look at the statistics of how much this shit costs Americans in terms of money, economic stagnation, and lives lost.
This case was just the last straw on the camel's back it would seem.
i've seen people arguing for both, that illegal immigration is a huge burden on the taxpayer, and that it isn't a huge burden on the taxpayer. send me some links for your side
Assuming you had the wherewithal to realize "arguments", to the effect that this mass migration and foreign colonization of our country is some net profit to the American people, constitute s unmitigated horse shit, or even the slightest agency to look up the costs for yourself, it might be worth while. Meanwhile, I have to finish ring and tricep dips to improve myself. Have a nice day.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25286
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:27 pm
DBTrek wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:17 pm
You need links to understand how 13 million people using your infrastructure, emergency healthcare services, judicial system, school system, and natural resources is a burden on the taxpayer?
For real?
If you can’t be bothered to consider what they provide, then it’s pretty simple. And these guys love simple.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25286
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:28 pm
The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:06 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:46 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:17 pm
Did you not argue for mass migration from Mexico so they would pick your vegitables as wage slave and keep your grocery bills lower?
Well, this was your guy.
I know. You will act shocked now and dispute you ever defended this shit.
No I did not. I argued against cutting them all off in some grand gesture. Because it would result in mass starvation.
But I know you can only think in binary, so sure. SJW open-borders.
Mass starvation for whom?
Large portions of Africa and the third world that depend on our agro exports.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:30 pm
You mean sending millions of low-skilled Americans to homeless camps?
Fuck off, Flounder.
They are an enormous burden on our societies. They are criminals and thieves. You are subsidizing them with welfare and then you have to pay for the costs of the displaced Americans.
You also are paying for their children's education, food, and health care.
They steal our identities to get these jobs if they pay a dime in taxes (often not).
They also represent a huge cost in crime and costs of incarceration.
Go tell this girl's parents her death was worth it for cheaper veggies, you fucking coward.
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:35 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:27 pm
If you can’t be bothered to consider what they provide, then it’s pretty simple. And these guys love simple.
We all know what they provide, and it’s often not worth minimum wage. So the odds that the benefits offset the systemic costs is zero. Taxpayers heavily subsidize illegal labor (and education, and medical, and transportation, and utilities, and on and on) and a few businesses get cheap labor (because taxpayers pay the rest of the costs)
Derp.
But you know, everyone will starve if we don’t keep mass exploiting the labor of illiterate foreign field peasants, or something.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25286
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:40 pm
DBTrek wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:35 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Aug 22, 2018 3:27 pm
If you can’t be bothered to consider what they provide, then it’s pretty simple. And these guys love simple.
We all know what they provide, and it’s often not worth minimum wage. So the odds that the benefits offset the systemic costs is zero. Taxpayers heavily subsidize illegal labor (and education, and medical, and transportation, and utilities, and on and on) and a few businesses get cheap labor (because taxpayers pay the rest of the costs)
Derp.
But you know, everyone will starve if we don’t keep mass exploiting the labor of illiterate foreign field peasants, or something.
Think about what you just said.
“The work is not worth minimum wage”.
So what do you think happens when we suddenly have to pay minimum wage to do it?