Civil War Doomsday Clock

[SuburbanFarmer]

You're a colossally stupid person.

No, you.

[Okeefenokee]

Im holding to our ideals, it’s the government that betrayed me, I’m not a traito- uuurgggjhhh

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

Not that you're dumb ass has ever read it.

Remember, this ignorant fool thinks the revolution was fought under the constitution.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Remember, this ignorant fool thinks the revolution was fought under the constitution.

Never said that. I said that the Revolution never would have happened under the Articles of Confederation. The states couldn’t cooperate.

whooosshhhhhhhh

[Okeefenokee]

Remember, this ignorant fool thinks the revolution was fought under the constitution.

Never said that. I said that the Revolution never would have happened under the Articles of Confederation. The states couldn’t cooperate.

whooosshhhhhhhh

You absolutely did say that you habitual liar,

In essence, the states couldn’t agree to fund an army, muster troops, or handle much of anything as a unit. It would have been 13 little countries trying to resist The Empire, and being picked off.

What government do you think they were operating under during the revolution of 1775 - 1783?

Perhaps the Articles of Confederation of 1777?

It sure as shit wasn't the Constitution of 1789.

Read a fucking book, melon head.

[TheReal_ND]

Remember, this ignorant fool thinks the revolution was fought under the constitution.

Never said that. I said that the Revolution never would have happened under the Articles of Confederation. The states couldn’t cooperate.

whooosshhhhhhhh

There were some issues that needed to be fixed which is why legislatures had met to discuss how to fix them. What happened instead was a literal coup de etat by the legislatures where they nailed the windows shut in the middle of summer.

History claims it was to get people to focus but that is retarded. They didnt want people to know what they were illegally doing.

http://fashthenation.com/2018/07/ftn-fo ... oup-detat/

[clubgop]

Does owning a gun require fantasizing about gun confiscation?

-

Why? Do you own a gun? They have infringed on every other right why is the 2nd immune? And you pretending you support the 1st amendment? HA Your love for English faggot exposed you on that. You were tested and as usual you failed, you tucked tail and ran like a bitch.

It’s a useful distraction. Keep the NRA goosing the public about their boomsticks while the constitution burns.

Absolutely pathetic.

It's more than pathetic it’s gaslighting. Typical undercover hack bitch shit. Join me, won't you? As I regale you of a journey of the usual goalpost moving, backtracking, and downright lies of our dirty dick friend and a tale of two civil rights organizations that dealt with that same behavior very differently.
First, the 2A as dirty dick originally understood it was simply an allowance for government to stockpile and arm weapons for their own purposes. He actually tried to tell us that while the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th amendments all prohibited government infringement of rights the 2nd curiously allowed the government an action that was already granted in Article 1 Section 8 of the same document. We quickly put the kibosh on that crap and he moved said goalpost to a “it is a collective right,” in that he tried to justify banning of certain features and a registration scheme, now finally we move to a place where he recognizes the individual right but says it doesn’t matter anyway. It is all some distraction while the constitution burns. The facts are clear the NRA and gun rights advocates didn’t back down and skull dragged people who were against self defense rights and dirty dick was the one that tried to burn a constitutional right but he and others like him are stopped.

Now, lets take a look at another civil rights organization that protects other constitutional rights and see how they deal with the arsonist like Dirty Dick.

http://reason.com/blog/2017/10/04/black ... ut-down-th
viewtopic.php?f=63&t=2755&p=110105&hilit=ACLU#p110105
https://reason.com/blog/2015/06/29/the- ... -freedom-b
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-aclu-r ... 1529533065
https://www.newsweek.com/free-speech-ha ... ump-652050

Oh they cave in and freedom speech now means freedom of speech for those the ACLU likes. I guess the ALCU have their priorities straight and didn’t let SJW bitches like Dirty Dick distract the American public while they themselves took freedom of speech out back and shot it like Old Yeller.
I know Dirty Dick all too well, he can say he is one of the 40% that will wait for the winner and maybe even he convinces himself of that but don’t be fooled he hates us, he hates you. He loves the elite, he wishes he could be them, he would give anyone and everyone of us up if it meant he could be among them. He can say he hates the play Hamilton but if given the chance to see the show for free and bask in the limelight of the New York elite for one night and all that was required is he be a backstage pincushion for cast and crew the first things he would do is rent a tux and buy a gallon of lube.

[Ph64]

You're a colossally stupid person.

No, you.

"I know you are, but what am i??"

Didn't that shit go out of style by like grade 3?

[Okeefenokee]

I said that the Revolution never would have happened under the Articles of Confederation. The states couldn’t cooperate.

whooosshhhhhhhh

The Articles formed a war-time confederation of states, with an extremely limited central government. While unratified, the document was used by the Congress to conduct business, direct the American Revolutionary War, conduct diplomacy with foreign nations, and deal with territorial issues and Native American relations. The adoption of the Articles made few perceptible changes in the federal government, because it did little more than legalize what the Continental Congress had been doing. That body was renamed the Congress of the Confederation; but Americans continued to call it the Continental Congress, since its organization remained the same.

If this ignorant dumb ass ever read a fucking book he might have known that his same argument was used as a punching bag in 1787 when anti-federalists pointed out that the articles had been functional enough to defeat the most powerful empire on earth and secure American independence.

[Okeefenokee]

Bet you a dollar he doesn't admit he was wrong.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Remember, this ignorant fool thinks the revolution was fought under the constitution.

Never said that. I said that the Revolution never would have happened under the Articles of Confederation. The states couldn’t cooperate.

whooosshhhhhhhh

You absolutely did say that you habitual liar,

In essence, the states couldn’t agree to fund an army, muster troops, or handle much of anything as a unit. It would have been 13 little countries trying to resist The Empire, and being picked off.

What government do you think they were operating under during the revolution of 1775 - 1783?

Perhaps the Articles of Confederation of 1777?

It sure as shit wasn't the Constitution of 1789.

Read a fucking book, melon head.

Grade school mistake. You didn’t even watch the video I posted, to make it easy for you.

The Articles of Confederation weren’t ratified until 1781. 5 years into the war.

Because the states. Couldn’t. Work. Together.

In 1786, Shays' Rebellion occurred in western Massachusetts as a protest against rising debt and economic chaos. However, the national government was unable to gather a combined military force among the states to help put down the rebellion, making clear a serious weakness in the structure of the Articles of Confederation.

What government were they under? Effectively, none. They just had a group of people in Congress winging it under an unofficial structure.