-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:49 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:39 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 5:51 am
I didn’t realize that Islamic states were in the heinous business of denying protest permits. Crimes against humanity, indeed.
But you cry like a bitch when we dont answer a question from CNN. Dance on broken glass.
Yeah, I think it would be a good idea for POTUS not to openly discriminate among news networks, but what do I know.
Drink a cold cup of bleach.
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Post
by clubgop » Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:51 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:43 am
"Which answers to a large extent to..."? That "large extent" being what, then? Among democracies isn't it only the US which allow its police forces to be directly controlled by politicians?
Wait what? How can you be a democracy if an elected official doesn't have some sort of control over police?
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Post
by clubgop » Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:55 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:49 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:39 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 5:51 am
I didn’t realize that Islamic states were in the heinous business of denying protest permits. Crimes against humanity, indeed.
But you cry like a bitch when we dont answer a question from CNN. Dance on broken glass.
Yeah, I think it would be a good idea for POTUS not to openly discriminate among news networks, but what do I know.
Drink a cold cup of bleach.
But the "last great statesman" could not shut up about Fox news and you said exactly what you know about, nothing, just like the hack bitch you are.
I would tell you to step on a rake but you do that all on your own.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:57 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:51 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:43 am
"Which answers to a large extent to..."? That "large extent" being what, then? Among democracies isn't it only the US which allow its police forces to be directly controlled by politicians?
Wait what? How can you be a democracy if an elected official doesn't have some sort of control over police?
You almost have the Euros about to take that moment of self-reflection here.
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:08 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:51 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:43 am
"Which answers to a large extent to..."? That "large extent" being what, then? Among democracies isn't it only the US which allow its police forces to be directly controlled by politicians?
Wait what? How can you be a democracy if an elected official doesn't have some sort of control over police?
By adhering to a Western principle known as "separation of powers".
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:09 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:08 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:51 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:43 am
"Which answers to a large extent to..."? That "large extent" being what, then? Among democracies isn't it only the US which allow its police forces to be directly controlled by politicians?
Wait what? How can you be a democracy if an elected official doesn't have some sort of control over police?
By adhering to a Western principle known as "separation of powers".
What separate power controls your police that you have no control over?
Do you see the problem here?
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Post
by clubgop » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:14 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:08 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:51 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:43 am
"Which answers to a large extent to..."? That "large extent" being what, then? Among democracies isn't it only the US which allow its police forces to be directly controlled by politicians?
Wait what? How can you be a democracy if an elected official doesn't have some sort of control over police?
By adhering to a Western principle known as "separation of powers".
Ah what? So you elect policemen directly?
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Post
by clubgop » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:20 am
Governance
Since January 2012, the Mayor of London is responsible for the governance of the Metropolitan Police through the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). The mayor is able to appoint someone to act on his behalf; the current office-holder is Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, Sophie Linden. The work of MOPAC is scrutinised by the Police and Crime Committee (also known as a police and crime panel) of the London Assembly. These structures were created by the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 and replaced the Metropolitan Police Authority appointed board created in 2000 by Greater London Authority Act 1999.
That is from the wiki. What the hell are you talking about?
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:26 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:14 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:08 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:51 am
Wait what? How can you be a democracy if an elected official doesn't have some sort of control over police?
By adhering to a Western principle known as "separation of powers".
Ah what? So you elect policemen directly?
No. We just don't give mayors or any elected that much
direct power over police. The top police chief of the country answers to the Danish justice departement.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:32 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:55 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:49 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:39 am
But you cry like a bitch when we dont answer a question from CNN. Dance on broken glass.
Yeah, I think it would be a good idea for POTUS not to openly discriminate among news networks, but what do I know.
Drink a cold cup of bleach.
But the "last great statesman" could not shut up about Fox news and you said exactly what you know about, nothing, just like the hack bitch you are.
I would tell you to step on a rake but you do that all on your own.
Leave CNN alone.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751