How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by clubgop » Sun Jun 17, 2018 5:34 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Sun Jun 17, 2018 5:33 pm
clubgop wrote:
Sun Jun 17, 2018 5:21 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Sun Jun 17, 2018 3:57 pm
Nah, I asked if this was serious at the beginning. They said they were, but no serious support of the OP has been posted, so I'm out.

I think were done here.
Yeah, as always Dirty dick sees a thread where his hack bitch side is losing and tries to shit on it but no worries I will beat this dead horse to a point where not even dirty dick would want to fuck it.
You saddled the horse, lets see you ride it.
Monday, Tuesday. Let it get like jerky in the hot sun first.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by clubgop » Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:36 pm

Alright I am going to parse this out and put it out in parts. Here's the first.
In 2016, Putin’s regime mounted information warfare against the United States. Their aim was to disrupt the election and get Trump elected. The CIA determined this as fact in Dec 2016.
Just the CIA? First it was 17 intel agencies then it was just 4 https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... false.html
https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/new- ... 3fedb191ac

Now it is just the CIA, an agency that Dems wanted to destroy years earlier now pens their narrative. Give it a couple more months and the only person making this determination will be Arthur from the local fish market.
This conclusion has only had more evidence to support it since then,

Really? I just showed you clear evidence of dwindling proof. You might want to march to a dictionary and look up the word “more.”
to the point we now know which Facebook memes were from Russian accounts,
The left can’t meme so the Russians can’t either? You want to point me to that statute?
that they targeted battleground states, and Homeland Security testified to the Senate in June 2017 that Russian hackers targeted voting systems in 21 states.
Which one is it? Battleground states or 21 states, because the 2 aren’t the same. Also did Barack Obama lie to us?


So they did they cut it out or was Obama “statesmanlike” lying once again?
And hacking of our voting systems is impossible or was the President lying again?
No one is making this claim the claim they are making was that they accessed voter information, well that information is public and easily accessible. Now are they changing that info? Do you have any proof of this at all? More coming most likely tomorrow.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag » Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:12 pm

:popcorn
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
kybkh
Posts: 2826
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:33 am

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by kybkh » Tue Jun 26, 2018 11:41 am

Up to this point, the public evidence suggests, the Trump team had dismissed approaches from figures offering Russian dirt or proposing meetings with Russian officials. That changed at the beginning of June when Donald Trump Jr. responded favorably to British music publicist Rob Goldstone’s email relaying Russia’s alleged offer to supply incriminating information on Clinton.


Donald Trump Jr.
Bethany Baker/The Billings Gazette via AP
This was the sixth approach apparently designed to incriminate the Trump campaign. Goldstone, according to a New York Times article, included a line that succinctly laid the groundwork for later claims of collusion: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

The future president’s son wrote back: “If it’s what you say I love it.”

The documents, explained Goldstone, would be conveyed by a Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, who has longtime links to the Kremlin. At a June 9 meeting in Trump Tower, however, Veselnitskaya arrived empty-handed. Instead of bringing incriminating information on Clinton, she wanted to discuss a U.S. court case brought against Putin-allied Russian officials whose defense she was spearheading


https://www.realclearinvestigations.com ... probe.html
“I've got a phone that allows me to convene Americans from every walk of life, nonprofits, businesses, the private sector, universities to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme..." - Obama

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag » Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:01 pm

It's serious Entrapment for political purposes by the FBI
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:18 pm

S E R I O U S
E
R
I
O
U
S

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag » Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:31 pm

PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
jediuser598
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by jediuser598 » Wed Jun 27, 2018 8:32 am

ooky wrote:
Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:33 pm
Conspiracy AGAINST THE UNITED STATES charges? As my wetland delineation mentor used to say, that ain’t no chickenshit ditch, kid.
See how well this all went? :lol:
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by Okeefenokee » Thu Jun 28, 2018 12:34 am

jediuser598 wrote:
Wed Jun 27, 2018 8:32 am
ooky wrote:
Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:33 pm
Conspiracy AGAINST THE UNITED STATES charges? As my wetland delineation mentor used to say, that ain’t no chickenshit ditch, kid.
See how well this all went? :lol:
Yeah, she did another drive by with shit we're all too familiar with, got knocked on her ass, and went back to marching. You should join her.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag » Thu Jun 28, 2018 1:06 am

Okeefenokee wrote:
Thu Jun 28, 2018 12:34 am
jediuser598 wrote:
Wed Jun 27, 2018 8:32 am
ooky wrote:
Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:33 pm
Conspiracy AGAINST THE UNITED STATES charges? As my wetland delineation mentor used to say, that ain’t no chickenshit ditch, kid.
See how well this all went? :lol:
Yeah, she did another drive by with shit we're all too familiar with, got knocked on her ass, and went back to marching. You should join her.
The shame is I honestly asked her if she was serious about defending her claims. She said she was, but that amounted more unsubstantiated claims in one or two more posts.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience