Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19062
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

Post by Martin Hash »

Okeefenokee wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:17 pm I figure Hash oughta know it's better to have a financially motivated employee than a sycophant.
Then you don’t know much.

If money determined elections, Clinton would be president.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

Post by clubgop »

C-Mag wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:43 pm
clubgop wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:13 pm
Kath wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:37 am

It would save so much money with the added bonus of candidates not telling one story to Ohio and then telling the opposite to Texas.
No not gonna happen.
I'm sure people said McKinley was crazy too
Not about being crazy that was 1900 man. The federal government wasn't the grab bag of goodies that it is now. Santa Claus has to go out and press the flesh. The dog and pony show of campaigning, the local press coverage, the venues, the personnel you think that all goes away? Talk about saving money. Who's money? The campaign's? The donor's? They don't care about that shit. If you save money in one area cool that means you can spend it somewhere else.
User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

Post by clubgop »

Martin Hash wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:15 pm
Okeefenokee wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:17 pm I figure Hash oughta know it's better to have a financially motivated employee than a sycophant.
Then you don’t know much.

If money determined elections, Clinton would be president.
Forgive them they think this thing is like a regular legitimate business, it isn't. They are lawyers in this business and you want to know why so many lawyers are in politics? Because like a lawyer they get paid no matter the result. There are no contingency fees here my friend. In fact the real business is in losing. Ever notice how the winning campaign guru go off and do something else while the losers hover around and work with campaign after campaign, after campaign collecting fees while trying to get that W?
Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

Post by Kath »

clubgop wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:13 pm
Kath wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:37 am

It would save so much money with the added bonus of candidates not telling one story to Ohio and then telling the opposite to Texas.
No not gonna happen.
Of course not, buzz killer.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19062
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

Post by Martin Hash »

clubgop wrote: Thu Jun 14, 2018 1:21 am
Martin Hash wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:15 pm
Okeefenokee wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:17 pm I figure Hash oughta know it's better to have a financially motivated employee than a sycophant.
Then you don’t know much.

If money determined elections, Clinton would be president.
Forgive them they think this thing is like a regular legitimate business, it isn't. They are lawyers in this business and you want to know why so many lawyers are in politics? Because like a lawyer they get paid no matter the result. There are no contingency fees here my friend. In fact the real business is in losing. Ever notice how the winning campaign guru go off and do something else while the losers hover around and work with campaign after campaign, after campaign collecting fees while trying to get that W?
So true. My favorite campaign advisor doesn't even know the issues. She couldn't tell you what the news was today, or even any history, but she can sure talk about up-to-the-minute campaigning odds. In the weird environment around me, even though everyone thinks I'm going to lose, I have a kind of aura. That plus a random viral event, and I win. I think everyone else suspsects that too.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

Post by Okeefenokee »

Martin Hash wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:15 pm
Okeefenokee wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:17 pm I figure Hash oughta know it's better to have a financially motivated employee than a sycophant.
Then you don’t know much.

If money determined elections, Clinton would be president.
And if true believer sycophants determined elections she would as well.

But neither of those statements are what I said.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

Post by Speaker to Animals »

I don't think the people around her gave a shit about her vision, really. They were in it for the power and access. Indeed, that's all these deep state critters are interested in. They really don't have a driving ideology. The shit you see on television is just a farce.

Hash has a point there.

Trump wasn't supposed to win, but he hired people who actually believed in this nationalist idea. Say what you want about guys like Bannon, they are believers whereas the spirit-cooking criminal collaborators that Clinton hired were just power junkies.
User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19062
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

Post by Martin Hash »

Hillary paid for PR and bought votes, she lost. Trump relied on True Believers, he won. Buying loyalty is always a losing proposition.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: Out of the Ordinary Political Campaigns

Post by Ph64 »

Speaker to Animals wrote: Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:02 am I don't think the people around her gave a shit about her vision, really. They were in it for the power and access. Indeed, that's all these deep state critters are interested in. They really don't have a driving ideology. The shit you see on television is just a farce.

Hash has a point there.

Trump wasn't supposed to win, but he hired people who actually believed in this nationalist idea. Say what you want about guys like Bannon, they are believers whereas the spirit-cooking criminal collaborators that Clinton hired were just power junkies.
People saw her as a typical politician, say whatever it takes to get elected no matter what they believe, and once elected it doesn't matter, you can do what you want. So nobody believed her, for good reason.

Trump, and I think Bernie, both sounded like "believers" to their constituents - whether they were/are or not the people believed they were. The things they said as far as "campaign promises" most people realized probably weren't going to happen, were "pie in the sky" outside what a president alone really has the power to do, but as long as the people believed they would fight for those things the candidates sounded "real/believable".

Hillary just comes across too much as corrupt/phony. And she's a lousy actor.