THE ERA OF TRUMP

[SuburbanFarmer]

I'm apparently the only one that even reads before posting anymore.

You are complaining that only pretty women qualify for that particular scholarship. You implied they were all dumb. I've responded completely appropriately.

Do you want to do away with every scholarship that isn't based on academic achievement? Because, you would literally be taking away millions of dollars from HS graduates.

What would you do with the scholarships for having done nothing but being born the right ethnicity?

No, Kath. I did not.

I said that the odds of a 4-year graduate getting a senatorial internship are practically nil. Implying that she both comes from a very upper class background, and got that internship because she's a beauty pageant winner.

Your post said something about "the first Miss America winner to get a $50,000 scholarship", which I did not even comment on. That speaks for itself.

You may continue arguing against your strawman now.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Student loan debt just hit $1.5 trillion. Women hold most of it
https://amp.cnn.com/money/2018/06/05/pf ... index.html

Just another nail in the coffin that is GCF/SFs worldview.

Curious which of my 'worldviews' you're commenting on, but it doesn't really matter. I'm the SJW boogeyman here, somehow.

[Okeefenokee]

She married Donald Trump.

Kath, don't you see this as degrading and devaluing to immigrant women ?

Take a poor immigrant like Melania. Odds of her ever meeting a rich patron, without the slave pageant? Virtually nil.

She’d have grown old and been married off to a minor, local warlord, without it. Possibly a small-time businessman. Now she’s the property of the most powerful warlord in the world.

To BroGrump, immigrant women don't have the intelligence, work ethic or drive to accomplish anything.

He equates immigrants with cheap produce. That's all.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Kath, don't you see this as degrading and devaluing to immigrant women ?

Take a poor immigrant like Melania. Odds of her ever meeting a rich patron, without the slave pageant? Virtually nil.

She’d have grown old and been married off to a minor, local warlord, without it. Possibly a small-time businessman. Now she’s the property of the most powerful warlord in the world.

To BroGrump, immigrant women don't have the intelligence, work ethic or drive to accomplish anything.

He equates immigrants with cheap produce. That's all.

Here we go. Chucklefuck himself stands ready to defend all that's ignorant and misinformed.

[DBTrek]

These pageants advertise their goods and pedigree for hundreds of eligible trophy-seekers. It’s a valuable resource for a female with no prospects of a useful existence.

$1.5 trillion in college debt says pretty much all females have prospects for a useful existence, with or without “slave pageants”.

[SuburbanFarmer]

These pageants advertise their goods and pedigree for hundreds of eligible trophy-seekers. It’s a valuable resource for a female with no prospects of a useful existence.

$1.5 trillion in college debt says pretty much all females have prospects for a useful existence, with or without “slave pageants”.

It's a very good thing that I didn't argue otherwise.

[DBTrek]

except in that direct quote where you did argue otherwise, derp-master-flash.

[Kath]

No, Kath. I did not.

I said that the odds of a 4-year graduate getting a senatorial internship are practically nil. Implying that she both comes from a very upper class background, and got that internship because she's a beauty pageant winner.

Your post said something about "the first Miss America winner to get a $50,000 scholarship", which I did not even comment on. That speaks for itself.

You may continue arguing against your strawman now.

My bad, you said internship; I read scholarship. That said, she scored the internship before the pageant. How do you know the senator chose her for her beauty?

[SuburbanFarmer]

except in that direct quote where you did say it, derp-master-flash.

Shall I start pulling out random pieces of convo, and wave them around to dictate your 'worldviews' as well? Or should we perhaps read the context of what was being discussed?

EDIT: Ahhhh I see now. Since I used the term "a female", your SJW instincts were triggered to extrapolate my statement to "all females", and therefore I became a misogynist.

Then you attempted to "refute" my statement, by posting that females have racked up a staggering amount of college loan debt, and therefore, must be eminently qualified as a group.

Identity politics at its finest, truly.

I appreciate how difficult it must be for you to scroll the additional 2 inches, and understand what I was talking about.

[SuburbanFarmer]

No, Kath. I did not.

I said that the odds of a 4-year graduate getting a senatorial internship are practically nil. Implying that she both comes from a very upper class background, and got that internship because she's a beauty pageant winner.

Your post said something about "the first Miss America winner to get a $50,000 scholarship", which I did not even comment on. That speaks for itself.

You may continue arguing against your strawman now.

My bad, you said internship; I read scholarship. That said, she scored the internship before the pageant. How do you know the senator chose her for her beauty?

Either that, or a very influential family.

What do you think he picked her for? Was she valedictorian? Did she write a paper of some value, during her 4 year education with zero work experience?

Do I really have to explain this to you?