Hindus

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Hindus

Post by BjornP » Tue May 22, 2018 1:18 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:43 pm


No education was allowable outside of the Church. And yes, in many places, it was punishable by death to own a copy of the Bible. Translation out of Latin was heresy for centuries.

You already know this.

Next, you'll argue that it was the feudal lords that maintained this system, not the Church. But we both know why they did that, and who directed it.
Nonsense. That the Church initially was responsible for most education is not evidence that they outlawed all education outside the Church. They didn't have a monopoly, they were simply the only one's offering education up untill the 11th century.

First: Look up medieval universities. Bologna, for example. Then find me some evidence that Church outright banned education outside the Church - prior to the rise of the first medieval universities (because I know you won't find anything past that).
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Hindus

Post by BjornP » Tue May 22, 2018 1:29 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 1:07 pm


Fair enough. A fully utilitarian society would be a nightmare, obviously. Which is why I regret not phrasing my statement differently.

But claiming that human beings have 'inalienable rights' is certainly not based on Scripture. It's an effort to make a genuine egalitarian society. It's also in the self-interest of the American Rebels to promote themselves as the most attractive government on earth, when rallying colonists to oppose a world empire.

And why not shoot for the moon? They'd crossed the planet, into unknown territory, and forged a society from The Great Nothing. Now they were about to reject the biggest naval superpower in history, and claim independence. The idealism inherent in that was simply carried over into their wishes for a new government.

If anything, the Constitution is quite rational - taking the best ideas from dusty old Europe, and rejecting the dogma of centuries past. There was really nothing less that would inspire people to die for it. Certainly not tax laws.
Did not say inalienable rights is based in capital S "Scripture". Point was that the world is full of irrationality outside the world of religions. Inflaming the passions of militias to fight for liberty isn't an appeal to reason. It's an appeal to an emotion, to an idea of people having a "natural" right to freedom. A pretty idea, and it becomes no less valid by not being rational, but it isn't some sort of objective, super-reasonable, philosophy.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Hindus

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue May 22, 2018 1:31 pm

BjornP wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 1:18 pm
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:43 pm


No education was allowable outside of the Church. And yes, in many places, it was punishable by death to own a copy of the Bible. Translation out of Latin was heresy for centuries.

You already know this.

Next, you'll argue that it was the feudal lords that maintained this system, not the Church. But we both know why they did that, and who directed it.
Nonsense. That the Church initially was responsible for most education is not evidence that they outlawed all education outside the Church. They didn't have a monopoly, they were simply the only one's offering education up untill the 11th century.

First: Look up medieval universities. Bologna, for example. Then find me some evidence that Church outright banned education outside the Church - prior to the rise of the first medieval universities (because I know you won't find anything past that).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_h ... _Near_East
Christian Europe
See also: Byzantine higher education, Cathedral school, and Monastic school

The Pandidakterion of Constantinople, founded as an institution of higher learning in 425, educated graduates to take on posts of authority in the imperial service or within the Church.[7] It was reorganized as a corporation of students in 849 by the regent Bardas of emperor Michael III, is considered by some to be the earliest institution of higher learning with some of the characteristics we associate today with a university (research and teaching, auto-administration, academic independence, et cetera). If a university is defined as "an institution of higher learning" then it is preceded by several others, including the Academy that it was founded to compete with and eventually replaced. If the original meaning of the word is considered "a corporation of students" then this could be the first example of such an institution. The Preslav Literary School and Ohrid Literary School were the two major literary schools of the First Bulgarian Empire.

In Western Europe during the Early Middle Ages, bishops sponsored cathedral schools and monasteries sponsored monastic schools, chiefly dedicated to the education of clergy. The earliest evidence of a European episcopal school is that established in Visigothic Spain at the Second Council of Toledo in 527.[8] These early episcopal schools, with a focus on an apprenticeship in religious learning under a scholarly bishop, have been identified in Spain and in about twenty towns in Gaul during the 6th and 7th centuries.[9]

In addition to these episcopal schools, there were monastic schools which educated monks and nuns, as well as future bishops, at a more advanced level.[10] Around the turn of the 12th and 13th centuries, some of them developed into autonomous universities. A notable example is when the University of Paris grew out of the schools associated with the Cathedral of Notre Dame, the Monastery of Ste. Geneviève, and the Abbey of St. Victor.[11][12]
All church-related, out to Byzantium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_university
Hastings Rashdall set out the modern understanding[12] of the medieval origins of the universities, noting that the earliest universities emerged spontaneously as "a scholastic Guild, whether of Masters or Students... without any express authorisation of King, Pope, Prince or Prelate."[13]

Among the earliest universities of this type were the University of Bologna (1088), University of Paris (teach. mid-11th century, recogn. 1150), University of Oxford (teach. 1096, recogn. 1167), University of Modena (1175), University of Palencia (1208), University of Cambridge (1209), University of Salamanca (1218), University of Montpellier (1220), University of Padua (1222), University of Toulouse (1229), University of Orleans (1235), University of Siena (1240), University of Valladolid (1241) University of Northampton (1261), University of Coimbra (1288), University of Pisa (1343), Charles University in Prague (1348), Jagiellonian University (1364), University of Vienna (1365), Heidelberg University (1386) and the University of St Andrews (1413) begun as private corporations of teachers and their pupils.[14][15]
First non-religious school founded in Europe - University of Bologna, as you mentioned. So, we're already up to 4 centuries of church-only education.

General education of the masses though, wouldn't happen for another 700 years.

But we can imagine that a few wealthy kids and future monks constitute general literacy, if you want. It's not true, but I'm tired of pointing out the obvious.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: Hindus

Post by nmoore63 » Tue May 22, 2018 1:32 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:59 pm
nmoore63 wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:49 pm
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:46 pm


Fear of the Other/Imminent Attack. The Chinese and Russians are what they are, thanks to the steppe hordes. Without that pressure, I doubt they'd be anything like the totalitarian regimes they represent now.
Huh?

China has been like they are for 2000 years.
Whether they are Tang legions dominating the steppe, or Song mandrins getting dominated by the steppe....
Exactly my point. They haven't changed much, since the hordes came a-knockin'. They built a bigass wall, to stop them taking their shit. They ended up with a Mongol dynasty, at one point.

Yet their genetics are 92% of a single ethnic group - the Han https://www.travelchinaguide.com/intro/nationality/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_dynasty

The hordes came and knocked their shit over, then kept coming for 1,000 years. Eventually, the Chinese achieved incredible levels of technology and societal organization, but at the price of personal freedom. Survival mechanisms, when under threat.
Yet the Chinese and Russians were like that even when the steppe was subdued and there was no threat.

Side note: I think it has a lot more to do with the centralization needed to irrigate rice fields....

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Hindus

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue May 22, 2018 1:46 pm

nmoore63 wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 1:32 pm
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:59 pm
nmoore63 wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:49 pm


Huh?

China has been like they are for 2000 years.
Whether they are Tang legions dominating the steppe, or Song mandrins getting dominated by the steppe....
Exactly my point. They haven't changed much, since the hordes came a-knockin'. They built a bigass wall, to stop them taking their shit. They ended up with a Mongol dynasty, at one point.

Yet their genetics are 92% of a single ethnic group - the Han https://www.travelchinaguide.com/intro/nationality/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_dynasty

The hordes came and knocked their shit over, then kept coming for 1,000 years. Eventually, the Chinese achieved incredible levels of technology and societal organization, but at the price of personal freedom. Survival mechanisms, when under threat.
Yet the Chinese and Russians were like that even when the steppe was subdued and there was no threat.

Side note: I think it has a lot more to do with the centralization needed to irrigate rice fields....
The tradition was well-established, by that point. It became their culture.

Even now, when you speak to a Chinese national, ask them about their government - censorship, one-child, Communism, whatever. They'll instantly start apologizing for the government and justifying it. Now, that may well be because they're scared of being reported on, but from all appearances, the culture really is one of submission to the state, no matter WHAT.

Not sure that I follow the rice field thing. It certainly requires some infrastructure, but European agriculture had organized irrigation systems for centuries as well, if less elaborate ones.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Hindus

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue May 22, 2018 1:49 pm

Nicholas Wade, in Troublesome Inheritence, argues that it was the result of the end of the warring states period. The new emperor needed to eradicate tribalism and inherited power (except his own), and created a bureaucracy that admitted people based on rote memory and conformity. This also had the effect of raising the average IQ so high. On the other hand, the extreme conformity and submission don't help with innovation.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Hindus

Post by Montegriffo » Tue May 22, 2018 2:26 pm

BjornP wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:08 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 11:54 am


I'm solidly behind you on this one Grumps, it's about time we grew out of all these devisive outdated God bothering ways and moved forward together into a slightly less oppressive future without them. All of them...
Right. As long as religion ain't there anymore, there won't be anyone around anymore who'd want to control how you fuck, how you talk, how you act, how you believe. Oh, and of course... not having religions anymore, would obviously mean societies become much more rational, scientific, and not prone to unproven, untestable and unscientific belief systems. Like homeopathy... or democracy and human rights. ;)
I don't think I said any of that.
My claim was that it would be slightly less oppressive. Small steps...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Hindus

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue May 22, 2018 2:31 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 2:26 pm
BjornP wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:08 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 11:54 am


I'm solidly behind you on this one Grumps, it's about time we grew out of all these devisive outdated God bothering ways and moved forward together into a slightly less oppressive future without them. All of them...
Right. As long as religion ain't there anymore, there won't be anyone around anymore who'd want to control how you fuck, how you talk, how you act, how you believe. Oh, and of course... not having religions anymore, would obviously mean societies become much more rational, scientific, and not prone to unproven, untestable and unscientific belief systems. Like homeopathy... or democracy and human rights. ;)
I don't think I said any of that.
My claim was that it would be slightly less oppressive. Small steps...
Why do you spend your entire life hating God, Monte? :lol:
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Hindus

Post by clubgop » Tue May 22, 2018 5:14 pm

DBTrek wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:13 pm
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:09 pm
nmoore63 wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 12:07 pm
I wouldn't get too worked up about Hindu's.

There is a reason they have been subjugated far more than they have had any sort of self rule.

Once you believe in reincarnation... its pretty difficult to get folks riled up enough about the present to rebel or conquer.
The Sikhs are legendary warriors. They were never really subjugated, to my knowledge, until the British came along.

You can get a lot of fight out of somebody that expects to come right back after death.
Sikhs aren’t Hindus.
:doh:
BBQ sauce, primary elections, drug interactions, constitutional rights, and now religions he doesn't get anything right yet he runs around here calling everyone else the idiot. Telling, indeed.

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: Hindus

Post by Kath » Tue May 22, 2018 5:48 pm

clubgop wrote:
Tue May 22, 2018 5:14 pm

BBQ sauce, primary elections, drug interactions, constitutional rights, and now religions he doesn't get anything right yet he runs around here calling everyone else the idiot. Telling, indeed.
Add "can't imagine how it's possible to run a mom & pop shop in Manhattan."

viewtopic.php?f=63&t=3632&start=30
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?