Now math is topsy turvy.The Conservative wrote:
I just don't play your little reindeer games of emotional topsy tervy.



Now math is topsy turvy.The Conservative wrote:
I just don't play your little reindeer games of emotional topsy tervy.
It is when it comes to you, hell you are half the time a PMS Molotov cocktail just waiting to be thrown. The other half, you use emotion to make a point.Kath wrote:Now math is topsy turvy.The Conservative wrote:
I just don't play your little reindeer games of emotional topsy tervy.![]()
![]()
Kath wrote:Let's do some math, TC.
Chicago 2.7 million people. Murder rate is 27.05 per capita = approx 475 people
St Louis 315,000 people. Murder rate is 59.3 per capita = approx 186 people
Apply St. Louis' murder rate to Chicago (27.05 * 59.3) = 1,604 murders it would take in Chicago to equal St Louis' per capita murder rate.
On the other side, if St. Louis had Chicago's murder rate, they would only have 55 murders.
Math. It's real.
:facepalm: Math is hard, I understand. Leave it to the grown ups, TC.The Conservative wrote:
Can't do that by your own logic, because the numbers don't work.
Obviously, you aren't one of them, because you don't understand the basics, especially since you need to take more into consideration than just one simple number to correlate your conclusion on.Kath wrote::facepalm: Math is hard, I understand. Leave it to the grown ups, TC.The Conservative wrote:
Can't do that by your own logic, because the numbers don't work.
Well, then that's Chicago since it has the "larger number".Kath wrote:Thinking is hard, TC, just always go with the highest number and you'll have your answer.