GrumpyCatFace wrote:
According to the law, there should be no preferential treatment for female employees. Non-issue.
And that issue will be resolved by making them unemployed?
Are you willing to say the same thing for every other mental illness?
Do I think we should fire or refuse to employ people with any mental condition? That's about half of the current workforce that we know of.
It's not the employer's job or concern to determine mental health. If we're really depending on them to do so, then we are severely fucked.
I didn't say we should bar all people with mental illness from employment. Try to use the brain God gave you. Can you imagine situations in which a mental illness might render a person unacceptable for some position of employment?
Are you willing to say the same thing for every other mental illness?
Do I think we should fire or refuse to employ people with any mental condition? That's about half of the current workforce that we know of.
It's not the employer's job or concern to determine mental health. If we're really depending on them to do so, then we are severely fucked.
I didn't say we should bar all people with mental illness from employment. Try to use the brain God gave you. Can you imagine situations in which a mental illness might render a person unacceptable for some position of employment?
Of course. But that's not the same thing as saying "nobody with this illness can work for me, because my feelz say so".
That would be no different than saying "colored need not apply".