Trump's SCOTUS

[JohnDonne]

Did you just call someone a name out of the blue? WTF, man, post something real.

You mean Nazi? I thought it was so obvious that it scarcely needed mentioning. You didn’t know?

[Montegriffo]

Is it at all possible that she didn't want to report it when it happened but when she saw him about to get on the SCOTUS, she decided she had a responsibility to say something? Is that even a possibility in your mind?

I said the same thing near the start of this thread. I got the same response, ie ''you're a hack bitch democrat''.
As far as I know there is not a single democrat voter on this forum but some members are so desperate for an enemy to strawman they consider anyone not toeing the alt-right line to be a hack bitch.
I've never voted Labour in my life but have been called everything from a democrat hack to a Marxist child fucker.
Welcome to the MHF.

Hack bitches of a feather...

Right on schedule...
More reliably predictable than a Japanese train timetable.

[Martin Hash]

Dude, I’m left of JFK & LBJ. Dems went Marxist since 1992. I didn’t go anywhere.

[Martin Hash]

Did you just call someone a name out of the blue? WTF, man, post something real.

You mean Nazi? I thought it was so obvious that it scarcely needed mentioning. You didn’t know?

I’ve never actually met a Nazi, I’ve only seen them on TV. R U an expert? Where’d you get your degree in Nazism?

[TheReal_ND]

You're excused for not recognizing what Nuke's doing. We have a long history with his posts so know his posting technique. There are others with distinct posting styles (see heydaralon, StA, and DB. Me too.) It's unlikely Nuke subscribes to the words he writes, he simply provides a window into the Alt-Right for our edification & amusement. I don't even know if he is Alt-Right?

guy is Nazi af. Why lie to nomad?

The Holocaust never happened but it should have.

[Martin Hash]

Until just this year, I rejected the narrative that Rs were The Patriarchy and Ds were The Matriarchy, but that now seems to be the case.

[TheAmericanNomad]

You, for example, appear to be a Loser, and I’m getting that just from seeing you post for a couple days. List your accomplishments: wife, kids, career, travel, education, control over your life. If you are low in all these things then you are a Loser in The Patriarchy game and would be willing to kick it over.

LOL. So this is how the forum leader here acts eh?

"Democrats are losers!"
"What measure are you using for that?"
"You! You are a loser!"

Okay dude, great argument. I was just asking you to define the terms we are debating under. And you can't even do that. No wonder your community is dominated by the overflow of another, more successful, podcaster's former posters.

My accomplishments? Why? I'm not sure how that is relevant. I have a published book, available at Barnes and Nobel and Amazon and Wal-Mart. I don't have a wife but I've been with my girlfriend for six years. I pay my own expenses with money I make doing what I've wanted to do since I was a child: writing. And I do that without a piece of paper from our governmental brain washing facilities. I've been all over the US, except for Alaska and the Northwest. I've been to Mexico, Costa Rica, Greece, Japan, Slovakia, Czech Republic, a few other countries but for such a short time they aren't worth mentioning.

But again, I don't see how that is relevant to how we define loser, or what evidence that the dnc is full of them and the gop isn't.

So I consider myself a success. Or at least, someone working towards success.

Dude, you asked for metrics, I provided them, you responded with non-Loser (remember, capital-L) credentials. I’d think you were advantaged by The Patriarchy. I at least say I’m a Democrat and run for office as a Democrat and debate as a Democrat; I know who makes up the majority of my Party - Losers.

Yeah, you provided them after you said "[you] appear to be a Loser" after knowing me for less than a day. Sorry but that doesn't seem like an honest attempt to have a discussion about the issue. That said, I'll apologize for the podcast swipe, it was a little uncalled for, but if you come after me, I'm going to come right back with the fire.

As for you being a Democrat, that doesn't really matter to me. I listened to a few of your podcasts but not enough to get a feel for your views. In either case, I've made it clear that I am no friend of the DNC.

I'm arguing that both sides are full of losers and personified the GOP's side with incels. You seemed to take issue with that and so I asked for what you think qualifies as a loser. Then, you mentioned "wife" as one of them, something incels clearly don't have.

So we are back to square one. How is it you think the DNC is full of Losers and the GOP, who appealed to the plight of the working class rust belt voters in 2016, typically a DNC voting bloc, would be devoid of them?

It might also help if you define Losers vs losers.

[Martin Hash]

You're excused for not recognizing what Nuke's doing. We have a long history with his posts so know his posting technique. There are others with distinct posting styles (see heydaralon, StA, and DB. Me too.) It's unlikely Nuke subscribes to the words he writes, he simply provides a window into the Alt-Right for our edification & amusement. I don't even know if he is Alt-Right?

guy is Nazi af. Why lie to nomad?

The Holocaust never happened but it should have.

Troll him, Nuke.

[Martin Hash]

The Patriarchy is liberty, meritocracy & Nationalism, with meritocracy being the most problematic. In today’s America, meritocracy is almost dead; it’s Who-You-Know now, but “Losers” do poorly in the meritocracy regardless. Losers would benefit from Equality, a tenet of The Matriarchy.

[TheAmericanNomad]

Dude, I’m left of JFK & LBJ. Dems went Marxist since 1992. I didn’t go anywhere.

That you think either of those two warmongers are left shows a disconnect. They belong with my avatar on the Mt Rushmore as the people most responsible for the American Imperial Machine.

There are no leftists in the democratic party, much less Marxists. The last leftist was Kucinich and the Democrats worked with the republicans to remove him. Now we just have Independents like Bernie and possibly the new wave of the likes of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but even they are questionable with their support of Cuomo and other center-right democrats.