Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
When I say the Democratic Party has a lot of mental illness, I mean that clinically, as a doctor. The Democratic Party appeals to and recruits losers, and who's more of a loser than a nutjob.
p.s. BTW, I was a Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representative this election cycle.
p.s. BTW, I was a Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representative this election cycle.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
So, to summarize your position: When a lefty kills someone, that's because the left incited violence. But when someone on the right kills someone, that is irrelevant and was just one guy.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 8:12 amTypical lefty response. The leaders call on people to not let them eat or shop anywhere. Call them evil. Do everything short of calling for them to be shot. Then when one of their flock predictably goes that additional step, claim innocence to inciting it. "Well, we didn't call for THAT. We just said to harass them and never let them do anything in public. I don't know how that could have been taken to mean commit violence by a mentally unstable supporter of ours".TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 7:53 amTelling people to harass senators isn't the same as advocating violence, not even close.
Yeah, one of us here is partisan, and it ain't me buddy. How many times have you voted republican?
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I happen to think this entire country has gone crazy. We have supposed lefties fighting against free speech. We have supposed conservatives carrying torches. We have lefties shooting people at congressional baseball games and we have right-wing nut jobs running people over with cars.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 8:29 amWhen I say the Democratic Party has a lot of mental illness, I mean that clinically, as a doctor. The Democratic Party appeals to and recruits losers, and who's more of a loser than a nutjob.
p.s. BTW, I was a Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representative this election cycle.
The right appeals to and recruits losers as well. Otherwise, how do you explain our resident incel Nukedog? And who is more of a loser than dudes who can't get laid?
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You're excused for not recognizing what Nuke's doing. We have a long history with his posts so know his posting technique. There are others with distinct posting styles (see heydaralon, StA, and DB. Me too.) It's unlikely Nuke subscribes to the words he writes, he simply provides a window into the Alt-Right for our edification & amusement. I don't even know if he is Alt-Right?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Well you can still use my comment without nuke dog. Incels are the biggest losers of them all and they certainly don't subscribe to MoveOn.org's newsletter.
But yeah, I figured everything with him was a shitpost. I wouldn't count him out as an incel though.
But yeah, I figured everything with him was a shitpost. I wouldn't count him out as an incel though.
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Dude, what's with it about incels? What, you think because some guy isn't fucking cunt regularly, their judgment is questionable? You better be applying that same logic to sexless women.
There's nothing wrong with the MGTOW movement; in fact, it's a natural reaction to the raising power of The Matriarchy.
There's nothing wrong with the MGTOW movement; in fact, it's a natural reaction to the raising power of The Matriarchy.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Blue pill men have a natural aversion to incels because blue pill men derive their self-worth from women. I think blue pill men are far more pathetic than incels.
Their hate for incels has more to do with their fear of becoming one.
Their hate for incels has more to do with their fear of becoming one.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You are the one who brought up "losers" and yeah, being unable to find a mate is usually indicative of being a loser. It is as good of a judgement as basing it on how much money they make, or whatever standard you are using to call the democratic voting base "losers"Dude, what's with it about incels? What, you think because some guy isn't fucking cunt regularly, their judgment is questionable? You better be applying that same logic to sexless women.
Most everyone wants to get laid. That is especially true of men. We have balls and testosterone and that makes us want to stick our dicks into something warm. It's an evolutionary desire. When you fail at that, it is a loss. Lose enough times and you are, by definition a loser.
As for women, yes and no. The "in" part of "incels" is important. If you are choosing not to get laid, because you are a monk, or you just aren't into it, or whatever, then that doesn't make you a loser. Because you are celibate by choice, aka what the incel community calls a volcel.
For women, a few of them really are incels, and yes, they are losers. They try to get laid and can't. But for the majority of them, it isn't hard to find someone to take the ride, even if you are an ugly, fat cow. But some men can't get laid, no matter how low they set their standards. Losers. Celibate women are usually celibate by choice.
But that also doesn't disqualify them from being losers. There are plenty of other measures you can put them against where they will fail and will be losers.
Errrr, I guess? Whats the power they have gained? I mean other than ruining beloved movie franchises like Ghostbusters and Star Wars, I haven't been affected by this so-called Matriarchy in any way. Perhaps you can elaborate?There's nothing wrong with the MGTOW movement; in fact, it's a natural reaction to the raising power of The Matriarchy.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Lol. What power have they gained?
How about destroying your life with lies and facing zero consequences for it.
How about destroying your life with lies and facing zero consequences for it.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I'm not blue pill because I haven't voted for a democrat in over ten years, and that was my one and only vote for a democrat in my lifetime.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:02 amBlue pill men have a natural aversion to incels because blue pill men derive their self-worth from women. I think blue pill men are far more pathetic than incels.
Their hate for incels has more to do with their fear of becoming one.
I don't hate incels, I feel bad for them actually. Just like I feel bad for people in poverty. They have a biological need that isn't being taken care of. I want to legalize prostitution to help them drain their balls, so they can think more clearly.
The majority of them do hate women though, as is evident by the posts in their forum. And many of them do have a mental illness, as evidence by how many of them lionize Alek Minassian and Elliott Rodger.
But that isn't all of them, and for the ones who don't advocate violence because they aren't attractive to women, I feel for them.