This BASED African American shaman has married the princess of Norway. You mad Europoors??? Us AMERICAN BULLS are marrying into all of your royal families.
BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
This BASED African American shaman has married the princess of Norway. You mad Europoors??? Us AMERICAN BULLS are marrying into all of your royal families.
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
https://shamandurek.com/about/
YOU CANT RESIST OUR BLACK MAGIC
DAS RITE YUROPOORSPIRITUAL GUIDE & GIFTED HEALER
A spiritual guide and gifted healer, Shaman Durek acts as a mediator or ‘bridge’ between the spiritual and physical planes, applies ancient spiritual wisdom, coupled with decades of devoted study and practice, to help bring success, happiness and healing into people's lives.
YOU CANT RESIST OUR BLACK MAGIC
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
lolololololol suck it commies
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
It's the American dream.TheReal_ND wrote: Mon May 13, 2019 4:05 pm
This BASED African American shaman has married the princess of Norway. You mad Europoors??? Us AMERICAN BULLS are marrying into all of your royal families.
Just admit it, you'd love your own Royal family.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
AMERICA STRONG
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
brewster
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
No, the voyeurs wouldn't. If the royals were boring they'd be no fun. We are at liberty to elevate whoever's the most entertaining to be the "royalty of the moment". Makes no difference whether they're Kennedys, Brangelina or Jenners. When they cease to be fun we toss them on the heap of has-beens and look for our next candidate.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
That's what I mean, Desperate to have your own Royal family.brewster wrote: Mon May 13, 2019 5:03 pmNo, the voyeurs wouldn't. If the royals were boring they'd be no fun. We are at liberty to elevate whoever's the most entertaining to be the "royalty of the moment". Makes no difference whether they're Kennedys, Brangelina or Jenners. When they cease to be fun we toss them on the heap of has-beens and look for our next candidate.
Aren't the Kardashians your current faux royalty?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
brewster
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
Absolutely. But we can move on/upgrade at any time. We're not stuck with dour old Charles who isn't very entertaining. When his nonagenarian dad is more fun, it's a bad sign.Montegriffo wrote: Mon May 13, 2019 5:07 pmThat's what I mean, Desperate to have your own Royal family.brewster wrote: Mon May 13, 2019 5:03 pmNo, the voyeurs wouldn't. If the royals were boring they'd be no fun. We are at liberty to elevate whoever's the most entertaining to be the "royalty of the moment". Makes no difference whether they're Kennedys, Brangelina or Jenners. When they cease to be fun we toss them on the heap of has-beens and look for our next candidate.
Aren't the Kardashians your current faux royalty?
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: BASED Americans are NEW royalty SUCK IT snowflakes
What? He talks to plants and married a horse. How much fun do you need?brewster wrote: Mon May 13, 2019 5:37 pmAbsolutely. But we can move on/upgrade at any time. We're not stuck with dour old Charles who isn't very entertaining. When his nonagenarian dad is more fun, it's a bad sign.Montegriffo wrote: Mon May 13, 2019 5:07 pmThat's what I mean, Desperate to have your own Royal family.brewster wrote: Mon May 13, 2019 5:03 pm
No, the voyeurs wouldn't. If the royals were boring they'd be no fun. We are at liberty to elevate whoever's the most entertaining to be the "royalty of the moment". Makes no difference whether they're Kennedys, Brangelina or Jenners. When they cease to be fun we toss them on the heap of has-beens and look for our next candidate.
Aren't the Kardashians your current faux royalty?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.