Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by TheReal_ND » Fri Apr 20, 2018 5:20 pm

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 20, 2018

Image

It is truly incredible to me that British men are not responding to things like this with mass shootings, mosque bombings, assassinations of public officials supporting these invading forces, etc.

I mean, it is just shocking that none of that is going on.

And no one is even getting arrested for talking about it. So the idea of it is apparently just totally not in the heads of men in Britain.

What is in their heads, I wonder?

Soccer?

Fashion?

Doctor Who?

It’s great though, whatever it is, that the British are so docile and understanding. Really makes the whole transformation so much easier.

BBC
Four men jailed for child grooming and treating “teenage girls like trophies” have been banned from using Snapchat.

Taiyab Hussain, 19, Mohammed Hizar Rizwan, 18, Shaheem Ratyal, 19, and Sohail Raja Ali, 19, all from Burton upon Trent, pleaded guilty to various child grooming offences in February.

They were each banned from the social media app for eight years at their sentencing at Stafford Crown Court.

The victims were five girls aged from 13 to 16.

His Honour Judge Jonathan Gosling said the case was “nothing like Rochdale” and that the men were not “predatory paedophiles” but “schoolboys”.
That’s funny, Judge, because if I didn’t know any better, I’d say it’s the exact thing – invading Moslems using white girls as sex slaves as a means to humiliate and demoralize the population that they are conquering by defiling their females.

But hey, what difference does it make?

The British male is okay with it, whatever the details.
He added: “The girls meant nothing to them, they were an agency to satisfy their adolescent lust.”

Judge Gosling said the men will be released after serving half their sentence, which was already reduced by 155 days.


Yeah, sure.

Just let them off.

With nothing.

Because they have brown skin.

Image

And after all, they’ve been victimized by… black slavery in America… or… the Holocaust… eh… oh, the British empire. That’s it. They did this because they were victimized by colonialism.

Image

And it could send a message to other Moslems to stay away from white girls if we locked them up too long, huh?

I mean, they really didn’t do much of anything – just general mischief, right?
The court heard one of the victims realised they were being abused after she watched a film warning how grooming can take place without victims knowing it.

She felt brave enough to tell her father what she thought was happening to her. The men were subsequently arrested and further victims came forward.

The court heard how one of the victims was 14 when she met Ratyal, 17 at the time, after he delivered a pizza to her. He admitted he “really liked her” and “initiated sexual contact with her”.

He forced her to perform sex acts and shared intimate pictures of her. The judge said Ratyal “convinced his victim that he loved her” and “she, in her childlike way, she thought she loved him too”.

Ali first met his victim on Snapchat. She was 13 at the time and he was 18.

The 13-year-old said the sexual activity with Ali “had a massive impact on her”.

The court heard Rizwan and Hussain picked up two victims in a car and forced them into performing sex acts. They did the same the next day, this time swapping girls.

A charge of collective conspiracy to abuse against the men was dropped but Judge Gosling said: “There was a joint interest in meeting and sexually abusing these young girls.

He added: “Some sexual activity was extreme. It fell short of rape. There were acts of degradation.”
Yeah sure.

Purposefully humiliating 13 and 14 year old girls sexually, apparently because of their race (I’ve certainly not ever heard of Pakistani men doing this to little Pakistani girls).

Boys will be boys.

Nothing really for British men to get angry about.

Or even think about.

Just keep looking great, lads.

Image

Because your value is based on looking good. Being up on the latest trends.

Of course, your ancestors would respond to the current situation by forming partisan resistance groups and putting pressure cookers in trash cans and meeting Eastern European men down at the docks.

They might even have some kind of policy where every time a little white girl gets “groomed” by Pakistani men, a little Pakistani girl’s body gets found in the river, all chopped-up into pieces.

But the modern British man knows better.

He knows what life is really about.

Looking good.

Image

If you start to get really stressed out about the fact that your country is being conquered, your little girls turned over to the brown conquering force, and your government condoning and actually helping to implement this process, well, just head down to the tattoo shop and get some work started on a sleeve.

Image

Nothing and I mean nothing is more fashionable than a sleeve tattoo.

At the end of your life, on your deathbed, as you lie alone under the fluorescent lights of a hospital, having never reproduced (because the Pakis got all your teenage girls), you’ll be able to look down at that sleeve and be like “wow, what a good use of money.”

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by Fife » Fri Apr 20, 2018 5:25 pm

Well, shit, Snapchat is dead, at least for a bit, mates.

I guess we'll just have to ride those little girls into our den using Instagram for the time being.

JohnDonne
Posts: 1018
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am

Re: Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by JohnDonne » Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:22 am

According to the BBC article linked, they each got four to five years, and will be registered sex offenders for life.

Therefore:

The judge didn't release them.

They didn't get let go with just a snap chat ban.

So the article writer lies and advocates terrorism, and chopping little pakistani girls to pieces, but laments the state of the modern British man, becuz sleeve tattoos.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Apr 21, 2018 5:20 am

JohnDonne wrote:According to the BBC article linked, they each got four to five years, and will be registered sex offenders for life.

Therefore:

The judge didn't release them.

They didn't get let go with just a snap chat ban.

So the article writer lies and advocates terrorism, and chopping little pakistani girls to pieces, but laments the state of the modern British man, becuz sleeve tattoos.
You realise you are responding to a daily Stormer article John. Don't waste your valuable time on it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by DrYouth » Sat Apr 21, 2018 8:36 am

Nuke this stuff is gonna contaminate your brain mate.

Promoting racial retaliation on the group... and obsessing over British fashion trends...

Pakistanis are not operating as a group... these four aren't part of some larger Pakistani operation to conquer the homeland.

Are you just playing around with this stuff Nuke or are you taking it seriously?
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by Okeefenokee » Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:55 pm

Just an isolated incident, y'all.

:roll:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 21, 2018 5:33 pm

JohnDonne wrote:According to the BBC article linked, they each got four to five years, and will be registered sex offenders for life.

Therefore:

The judge didn't release them.

They didn't get let go with just a snap chat ban.

So the article writer lies and advocates terrorism, and chopping little pakistani girls to pieces, but laments the state of the modern British man, becuz sleeve tattoos.

155 days and absolutely no Snapchat.

JohnDonne
Posts: 1018
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am

Re: Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by JohnDonne » Sat Apr 21, 2018 5:56 pm

Sentence was reduced by 155 days, not to.

Ironically, according to an Atlantic article on Andrew Anglin, Anglin has a penchant for underage girls. He slept with a fourteen year old filipina girl, and was hoping to marry sixteen year old muslim girls at one point.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 21, 2018 6:03 pm

Okay..
Judge Gosling said the men will be released after serving half their sentence, which was already reduced by 155 days.
So 575 days and no snapchat for brutally raping children.

JohnDonne
Posts: 1018
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am

Re: Judge Decides to Go Ahead and Release Paki Sex Gang, But Bans Them From Snapchat

Post by JohnDonne » Sat Apr 21, 2018 6:06 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
JohnDonne wrote:According to the BBC article linked, they each got four to five years, and will be registered sex offenders for life.

Therefore:

The judge didn't release them.

They didn't get let go with just a snap chat ban.

So the article writer lies and advocates terrorism, and chopping little pakistani girls to pieces, but laments the state of the modern British man, becuz sleeve tattoos.
You realise you are responding to a daily Stormer article John. Don't waste your valuable time on it.
I don't think it's a waste of time, I think it's educational for people on the sidelines sort of trying to figure out what to make of seemingly insane stories like a group of statutory rapists getting off with a snap chat ban. The answer? Didn't happen, it was a lie.