Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by **C-Mag** » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:45 pm

BLUF

Hillary brokered a deal to turn over 20% of US Uranium to Russia
Hillary received $145 Million via the Clinton Foundation which appears to be a Money Laundering shell company
FBI knew before the deal was completed that Russians were bribing Americans involved in Uranium
Obama administration people who knew about all this and did not act were Hillary, Eric Holder, Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein and Andrew McCabe.
NO questions have ever officially.

Nuke posted this topic in the Era of Trump, I think this thing is going to get big enough for its own thread
Nukes post and initial discussion viewtopic.php?f=63&t=1229&start=10530

Senator Chuck Grassley has reportedly been looking into this for months, and opened an official investigation last week. He is expected to ask Jeff Sessions about this tomorrow when he appears before the Senate
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10 ... ing-video/

Post by **SuburbanFarmer** » Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:55 pm

I don’t know much about this, but it’s important to differentiate between “uranium”, and “highly-enriched uranium”, which this is about. If it’s weapons-grade, then this is a very big deal indeed. And puzzling that anyone would even consider giving 20% of the stockpile to Russia.

Yeah, I might sound naive, but... that’s just a couple bridges too far to believe.

Post by **Martin Hash** » Wed Oct 18, 2017 12:32 am

Don’t change the issue: bribe for uranium.

Post by **Lemonade** » Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:29 am

This is about bribes for mining rights, correct? Uranium still in the ground.

Post by **Fife** » Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:45 am

Quid pro quo.

Rubels are the quid. The quo could be enriched uranium, mineral rights, pork bellies, whatever, doesn't matter. So long as there was a quo.

Does nuclear material as the quo make it more salacious? Yep.

Post by **C-Mag** » Wed Oct 18, 2017 6:27 am

There are several reasons this Clinton brokered deal is of interest. One at the top for me is, that so many FBI personnel were involved and sullied themselves as part of the deal it not immediately apparent who can even investigate this.
Session has recused himself from all 'Russia' stuff
Mueller is involved
Comey is Muellers buddy
Rosenstein is involved
McCabe is involved

Greg Jarret calls it racketeering, which looks accurate.

Post by **The Conservative** » Wed Oct 18, 2017 6:30 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:I don’t know much about this, but it’s important to differentiate between “uranium”, and “highly-enriched uranium”, which this is about. If it’s weapons-grade, then this is a very big deal indeed. And puzzling that anyone would even consider giving 20% of the stockpile to Russia.

Yeah, I might sound naive, but... that’s just a couple bridges too far to believe.

It doesn't take a lot for a country like Russia to enrich uranium...

Post by **SuburbanFarmer** » Wed Oct 18, 2017 6:50 am

The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:I don’t know much about this, but it’s important to differentiate between “uranium”, and “highly-enriched uranium”, which this is about. If it’s weapons-grade, then this is a very big deal indeed. And puzzling that anyone would even consider giving 20% of the stockpile to Russia.

Yeah, I might sound naive, but... that’s just a couple bridges too far to believe.
It doesn't take a lot for a country like Russia to enrich uranium...

No, but that’s a pretty big distinction. I dunno. There’s way too many possibilities here, and a good chance of fake newsery.

Post by **C-Mag** » Wed Oct 18, 2017 6:59 am

The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:I don’t know much about this, but it’s important to differentiate between “uranium”, and “highly-enriched uranium”, which this is about. If it’s weapons-grade, then this is a very big deal indeed. And puzzling that anyone would even consider giving 20% of the stockpile to Russia.

Yeah, I might sound naive, but... that’s just a couple bridges too far to believe.
It doesn't take a lot for a country like Russia to enrich uranium...

It's reported that enriched Uranium is being exported from the US with not real tracking after it leaves the US.

According to a 2010 press released from Tenex, a Rosatom subsidy, the company had signed “10 -long term Enriched Uranium Product supply contracts with eight U.S. utilities exceeding $4.3 billion and is aiming to expand its operations in the USA and beyond

Circa News is really the ones who broke this story https://www.circa.com/story/2017/10/17/ ... ith-Moscow

Post by **The Conservative** » Wed Oct 18, 2017 7:07 am

C-Mag wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:I don’t know much about this, but it’s important to differentiate between “uranium”, and “highly-enriched uranium”, which this is about. If it’s weapons-grade, then this is a very big deal indeed. And puzzling that anyone would even consider giving 20% of the stockpile to Russia.

Yeah, I might sound naive, but... that’s just a couple bridges too far to believe.
It doesn't take a lot for a country like Russia to enrich uranium...
It's reported that enriched Uranium is being exported from the US with not real tracking after it leaves the US.
According to a 2010 press released from Tenex, a Rosatom subsidy, the company had signed “10 -long term Enriched Uranium Product supply contracts with eight U.S. utilities exceeding $4.3 billion and is aiming to expand its operations in the USA and beyond
Circa News is really the ones who broke this story https://www.circa.com/story/2017/10/17/ ... ith-Moscow

Oh, why the hell are these people not in prison already... shit.

Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia