
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/upsh ... ilege.html
If you need to ask that, then you haven't been paying attention.
Fuck off you annoying piece of shit. This thread is for discussion and not your dumbass remarks.The Conservative wrote:If you need to ask that, then you haven't been paying attention.
Kettle, fucking black...SilverEagle wrote:Fuck off you annoying piece of shit. This thread is for discussion and not your dumbass remarks.The Conservative wrote:If you need to ask that, then you haven't been paying attention.
Women won't risk marrying someone who can't provide anything, but a good chunk of those same women are more than willing to have a kid (or kids) with them.“Women don’t want to take a risk on somebody who’s not going to be able to provide anything,” said Sharon Sassler, a sociologist at Cornell who published “Cohabitation Nation: Gender, Class, and the Remaking of Relationships” with Amanda Jayne Miller last month.
As marriage has declined, though, childbearing has not, which means that more children are living in families without two parents and the resources they bring.
Yup. My wife is a stay at home mom, for now, once my son is old enough, she will be going back to work, working mom hours, etc... The point is that you shouldn't have a kid if you can't afford it. Hell I know I couldn't when we first started out, so I worked my ass off to get the job I did. Now we barely make it paycheck to paycheck, but we can afford to have her stay home with our son so he can be raised right.PartyOf5 wrote:This part is is bit amusing and a bit sad:
Women won't risk marrying someone who can't provide anything, but a good chunk of those same women are more than willing to have a kid (or kids) with them.“Women don’t want to take a risk on somebody who’s not going to be able to provide anything,” said Sharon Sassler, a sociologist at Cornell who published “Cohabitation Nation: Gender, Class, and the Remaking of Relationships” with Amanda Jayne Miller last month.
As marriage has declined, though, childbearing has not, which means that more children are living in families without two parents and the resources they bring.![]()
That's not a privilege, it's making poor life choices. These poor choices are being perpetuated through generations, but they are still choices.
C-Mag wrote:Oh, this article is filled with all kinds of good quotes![]()
"Currently, 26 percent of poor adults, 39 percent of working-class adults and 56 percent of middle- and upper-class adults ages 18 to 55 are married"
"the reason for the decline: Unemployed men are less likely to be seen as marriage material.
Women don’t want to take a risk on somebody who’s not going to be able to provide anything,” said Sharon Sassler, a sociologist
"Labor market changes made men less marriageable"
“Women say, ‘If he’s not offering money or assets, why make it legal?’ ”
“When you have job decline in a big way, that fabric unravels. So even if you bring the jobs back, once the damage is done, it might take a while to repair.”
As I continually learn that everything in the US must be viewed through Race. I looked up the Racial demographics, so let's get that in here.
http://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/ta ... 13/432,431
Woo Hoo, Go Whitey. Only 25% of White kids are raised in single parent homes.![]()
After reading this I came to the conclusion women are saying, I'm only getting married if you are willing to support me financially. Otherwise, I will just keep looking until I find that sugar daddy.
“Women say, ‘If he’s not offering money or assets, why make it legal?’ ”