Trump needs a war time consigliere..

See hereMcMaster Removes Flynn Pick Derek Harvey From National Security Council
Retired Army Col. Derek Harvey, a longtime intelligence analyst who had been close to former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, has been fired from his job on the National Security Council — the latest twist of intrigue in a White House beset by competing power centers.
National Security Adviser H. R. McMaster "removed" Harvey, NSC spokesman Michael Anton told NBC News.
"General McMaster greatly appreciates Derek Harvey's service to his country as a career Army officer, where he served his country bravely in the field and played a crucial role in the successful surge in Iraq, and also for his service on Capitol Hill and in the Trump administration," Anton said in a statement. "The administration is working with Colonel Harvey to identify positions in which his background and expertise can be best utilized."
I think that it has come across.kybkh wrote: *I hadn't seen it. I am not a McMaster fan.
Wish he would use it on the press, no loss there if so.kybkh wrote:General Kelly replaces Reince.
Trump needs a war time consigliere..
Umm... who was in favour of Trump at the start, hmm?pineapplemike wrote:It's commonly accepted that the RNC was against Trump during the primaries, right?* And Reince was leadership at the RNC at the time? Why was he given a position again?
* I could be wrong on this
Evidently I'm wrong on this, moving alonghttp://www.cnn.com/2016/06/17/politics/ ... index.html
The Republican National Committee, which has largely aligned with the Trump campaign, also dismissed the effort Friday.
"The extent of this effort is a bunch of random people tweeting about it, full stop," said Sean Spicer, RNC chief strategist.
Not totally. With 17 canididates being pulled in all those directions it didn't really matter where individuals in the RNC ended up, unlike the DNC there was no one establishment canididate to rally around. Reince Preibus was the intermediary that kept things on the rails with all the establishment once he had the nomination all wrapped up. He was a very good party Chairman no reason he could have not been a good CoS but if he was leaking WTF?pineapplemike wrote:Evidently I'm wrong on this, moving alonghttp://www.cnn.com/2016/06/17/politics/ ... index.html
The Republican National Committee, which has largely aligned with the Trump campaign, also dismissed the effort Friday.
"The extent of this effort is a bunch of random people tweeting about it, full stop," said Sean Spicer, RNC chief strategist.
He seemed loyal to Trump through the campaign. Yeah he was leader of the GOP but he wasn't trashing Trump and wasn't a #NeverTrumper. But mayyybe he was secretly anti-Trump and is leaking stuff? Scaramucci might think so but there is no real info.pineapplemike wrote:It's commonly accepted that the RNC was against Trump during the primaries, right?* And Reince was leadership at the RNC at the time? Why was he given a position again?
* I could be wrong on this