American Coup D’etat

[C-Mag]

A little blogging. Just my thoughts. I would appreciate the team not derailing this page or trolling here. Short comments I don't mind. It's not designed to be a debate thread. Thanks I appreciate it.



American Coup D’etat
Part I
A Blog by Carlus Magnus


In 1992 Charles Dunlap wrote American Military Coup. Today, it appears we may be witnessing an American Coup D’etat, but by the Washington Establishment.
http://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/para ... lap_jr.pdf



On June 16th, 2015 Donald Trump descended the escalator at Trump Tower announcing his entrance into the 2016 Presidential race. The news was greeted by virtually all the corporate news outlets with mirth and mocking. Eighteen months later, they would not be laughing.

In the Fall of 2015 the Jeb Bush team hired an MI-5 agent to research and report on Trump and his business dealings with Russia. The agent returned the infamously unreliable Trump Dossier that included absurdities such as the Golden Showers. Around the time the Dossier was completed Jeb Bush was effectively out of the race. Enter the Clinton Clan.

Around the end of December and the beginning of January 2016 the HIllary teams hired the same agent, and the Dossier was turned over to Hillary. By January 20th corporate media outlets were reporting the FBI was investigating Trump. This was later confirmed.

The investigation continued through 2016 and the November 8th election. Following the Trump victory multiple groups and individuals began an active resistance to the coming Trump Presidency. This included lame duck President Obama loosening security regulations to aid in the investigation of Trump. Hillary Clinton forming the #Resistance group that would eventually see an assassin be a member of that group. Nasty Women would join together and form a march for Irritated Vagina's. AntiFa organized and trained for violent attacks on Trump supporters. The Chair of the Senate Armed Services flew to England to hand carry the now discredited Trump Dossier.

Behind the scenes the major intelligence agencies went to work, doing what they have done in many countries, preparing to over throw a free and fair election to install a candidate more malleable to their long term goals.



EDIT: The US War College has deleted the Military Coup paper, here is a different link to the paper
https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/p ... oldunl.htm

[Ex-California]

This wouldn't be the first time.

Bankers tried to get Smedley to lead a military coup against FDR

[C-Mag]

Part II

Most modern Americans grow up with the warm fuzzy idea of the peaceful transfer of power, a coup or putsch to Americans is unthinkable. But it arguably has been tried several times in the past. Coups require a fair amount of resentment toward the ruling power, usually fanned by reporters who have taken the side of the insurgents, and eventually military support or a promise from the military to stand aside.


What was our American Revolution if not a coup against the British Crown? In the years leading up to April 19th, 1775 Colonists maintained a barrier against the crown by electing local colonial judges who looked on their fellow countrymen favorably in judgements. This was too much for the crown and the judges were replaced by Loyalists. This caused colonials to revolts, running many a loyalist judge out of town after tarring and feather. The American Revolution took time to build, remember no bodies fought the British for 15 months before the Continental Congress declared independence, before the colonial politicians committed to join the coup. Prior to that they actually begged forgiveness for the rowdy, troublesome hillbillies in Lexington and Concord who started the shooting.

The election of Abraham Lincoln started the secessionist movement, and divided the country. Half the press was printing fake news daily in an attempt to build resentment against the upstart from a new party. The fake news centered around charges of Miscegenation. Lincolns detractors claimed that Lincoln sought black and whites breeding to create a new breed of American Ubermensch. This Fake News so plagued Lincoln that he continued to fight against through the 1864 election. http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/15/opinion/k ... coln-hoax/
There was an entire 72 page pamphlet on the subject of Lincoln and his desires for Miscegenation. From an anonymous source who knew what Lincoln was up to of course. https://ia802609.us.archive.org/22/item ... 00crol.pdf

Then came the coup to overthrow Franklin Delano Roosevelt. FDR came into office with a good relationship with the press, but the relationship soured. By 1934 FDR's own numbers said the press was 85% against him. The number is arguable. To go directly to the American people and circumvent the commentary from a hostile press FDR would employ a new technology that had recently spread through the nation, the radio. FDR started the Fireside Chats as a way to limit the negative commentary from the press. Butler would later testify that Gerald C. MacGuire attempted to recruit him to lead a coup, promising him an army of 500,000 men for a march on Washington, D.C., and financial backing. Butler testified that the pretext for the coup would be that the president's health was failing. MacGuire reportedly said, " You know the American people will swallow that. We have got the newspapers. We will start a campaign that the President's health is failing. Everyone can tell that by looking at him, and the dumb American people will fall for it in a second..." MacGuire had traveled around the globe and felt Fascism was the wave of the future, he even traveled to Italy to see how Mussolini managed to run things. But the coup failed largely due to one man, Smedley Butler. Though many hold it had little chance of success anyway.

Today we see the same tools being used in the modern Establishment Coup. An active press, endlessly pushing some mystical connection about Trump and Russia. But it is merely history rhyming. For Trump Russia, for FDR Health, for Lincoln Miscegenation. Presidents dealt with the hostile press an their fake news different ways, but the common thread seems to be each of these presidents sought to connect to average people directly. Abraham Lincoln is famous for manipulating (and imprisoning) the press. He would pull all kinds of shenanigans to get his message out, including fake letters or 'leaked letters', he got so he didn't even really read the press' daily hate of him and had subordinates do it, while he spent time one on one with average folks. FDR had his Fireside Chats and he overly exaggerated how much the press hated him, Trump has his tweets. Generally ridiculed, Trumps tweets go directly to the people, skipping the filter of the press. The press hates having their egos bruised by a leader who will circumvent them.

In the current coup the press' coverage of Trump is 90% Negative, but Trump just his 50% approval in the Rasmussen Poll, 2.5 points higher than Barack Obama at this stage in his presidency. It doesn't hardly seem possible. Americans are fed a daily diet by a 24/7 media of some kind of Trump-Russia connection that is illegal or bad for the US. But there are never enough specific infractions for anyone to say a certain crime has been committed, just that there is a lot of smoke, so there must be fire. Perhaps the 24/7 news is breaking against the strange seawall of Trumps never ending tweets. A recent CNN poll said that 70% of Americans(2.6 million polled) say Trump should not be investigated. Tweeting is a relatively new technology where Trump is able to go direct to the American people, not unlike FDR and Lincoln before him.

[C-Mag]

Part III

For 4 years, the Establishment investigated Donald Trump in a way that no other candidate and certainly not President had been investigated. It would go through several evolutions of increasing severity and seriousness, but with lesser justification.

The initial investigation of 2016 was based on Trumps low level foreign policy adviser Carter Page's illicit dealings with Russia. Three years later we would learn that Carter Page was a CIA asset inserted into the Trump campaign, and the FBI covered up the knowledge of Page's CIA connections. It would not be the only criminal activity by the FBI. The FBI changed notes, lied, falsified documents, made false claims on FISA warrants a total of 54 time the inspector general revealed. People were fired and forced into retirement, but none have been jailed.

The 2016 FBI investigation transitioned into the 2017 Mueller investigation. With the major players joining Muellers Special Counsel investigation that would last for nearly 2 years. Yet, find no chargeable offenses, even with unlimited power to investigate. The establishment was frustrated, but not finished using the their government powers in affecting a coup. By the Summer of 2019 they engineered impeachment proceedings using whistleblower protections, intelligence committees, and bureaucrats testimony to claim President Trump had abused power in dealings with the Ukraine. The Establishment was being forced to use more and more assets this time. State Department and Pentagon agents revealed themselves to be more loyal to the policy of the 'Inter-Agency' Establishment, than the foreign policy of the sitting POTUS. They were able to impeach the POTUS in a kangaroo court in the House, but failed miserably in the Senate. The Establishment had done all the heavy punching they could do and lost.

However, they were not done. The Establishment is primarily Baby Boomer 60s lefties who will not give up power. They would resort to their origins and take it to the street in the next iteration. The Establishments judicial wings lingering job was to continue to keep General Flynn under Damocles Sword.

[C-Mag]

This wouldn't be the first time.

Bankers tried to get Smedley to lead a military coup against FDR

Thanks, I need to address that history as well.

[heydaralon]

I've read about the Smedley alleged coup, I'm still on the fence about whether it was a serious attempt or merely just some rich guys drinking and talking shit. They've never been able to conclusively show who was even in on it. FDR was pretty hated by a lot of businessmen, but idk how far they were willing to go. A lot of plots are like this. Historians of the Third Reich still argue about whether Ludendorff was in on the beer hall putsch or if he was brought there unaware of what was happening.

[TheReal_ND]

Smedley's character was outstanding, which is why he was chosen. I believe him.

[heydaralon]

Smedley's character was outstanding, which is why he was chosen. I believe him.

Have you ever read Smedley Butler's War is a Racket? Its tiny dude. You could read and finish it while taking a shit. Its a pamphlet but its kind of interesting. The Jules Archer book The Plot to Sieze the White House deals with the Business Plot and Butler. Its a pretty wild story. Idk what to think about the plot effectiveness.

[SuburbanFarmer]

who is the coup against? The political establishment, or the financial machine that controls them?

Trump would be a victory for the banksters, while Hillary would have been a continuance of the political establishment.

OR...

Perhaps Trump is actually the candidate of the Deep State, and was supported by them, to overthrow the Financial AND Political establishment.

OR...

He really just rallied an electoral victory because Hillary was so pathetic (my choice, lacking further evidence).

Point is, we don't really know. And won't, until the memoirs are written.

[C-Mag]

Part III is above


Commie plan for dealing with threats
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dtz ... Rtt8A/edit

National shutdown plan
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WtD ... -dc-people#