TheReal_ND wrote:Nah. I reject that comparison. The parity is much closer, the host country is technologically superior and diesease doesn't play much of any factor. A better comparison would be Rome circa late empire imo.
That too. But Germans didn't have an ideology that compelled them to exterminate the indigenous populations. Most of them were Christians as well, so it wasn't even all that traumatic in the end.
Furthermore, the parts of the comparison between us and the Indians that match up are even more relevant. For instance, the natives in the northeast welcomed the English, and even saved them. The pilgrims, for example, were literally refugees from the English civil wars. The natives fed them and supported them. All the things the left encourages us to do for Muslims, the Indians did for the English up until the point when it was obvious they were being replaced and dispossed of everything.
I remember reading an account of a native who, after his tribe was wiped out, recounted what it was to see the end of his people. It was very disturbing. This is what marxists whites have constantly been signaling they approve of happening to us. I am not sure they really connect the dots here. I don't think they realize they are going to be like that Indian looking at the extinction of their people if their side wins.
