Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14807
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by The Conservative »

Are you serious? People are saying this T-shirt represent the strength of the corrupt Congresswoman Elizabeth Warren?!

Are you fucking kidding me? This woman is no Rosa Parks... also has anyone else noticed the imagery? WTF... why not just come out with another socialist symbol... oh wait... we did... Bernie Sanders...

Image
#NotOneRedCent
User avatar
Dand
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:57 pm

Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by Dand »

That's great. Warren is an even nastier dingbat than Hillary. Let her be the next D nominee pls :pray:
Last edited by Dand on Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
apeman
Posts: 1566
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am

Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by apeman »

There is no reason to believe she was silenced because she is a woman, unless you view every issue through the lens of gender.

Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.
User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14807
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by The Conservative »

apeman wrote:There is no reason to believe she was silenced because she is a woman, unless you view every issue through the lens of gender.

Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.
She was censured for this time because she slandered a person on the congressional floor... which is not allowed. It had nothing to do with her gender, or even race (Indian or Caucasian)... it had to do with her opening her mouth at the wrong time at the right place...

I wish the censure was permanent...
#NotOneRedCent
User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14807
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by The Conservative »

Dand wrote:That's great. Warren is an even nastier dingbat than Hillary. Let her be the next D nominee pls :pray:
Image
#NotOneRedCent
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by Speaker to Animals »

You guys are trans-racists.
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by Speaker to Animals »

Yeah, I am seeing that stuff in what is left of my progressive friends on Facebook. I think I might try to burn a few more bridges with this one. :lol:
apeman
Posts: 1566
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am

Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by apeman »

The Conservative wrote:
apeman wrote:There is no reason to believe she was silenced because she is a woman, unless you view every issue through the lens of gender.

Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.
She was censured for this time because she slandered a person on the congressional floor... which is not allowed. It had nothing to do with her gender, or even race (Indian or Caucasian)... it had to do with her opening her mouth at the wrong time at the right place...

I wish the censure was permanent...
She was censored because she is on the other team. Politics as usual.
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by Speaker to Animals »

You mean she wasn't censored because of her vagina??
User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14807
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

Post by The Conservative »

apeman wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
apeman wrote:There is no reason to believe she was silenced because she is a woman, unless you view every issue through the lens of gender.

Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.
She was censured for this time because she slandered a person on the congressional floor... which is not allowed. It had nothing to do with her gender, or even race (Indian or Caucasian)... it had to do with her opening her mouth at the wrong time at the right place...

I wish the censure was permanent...
She was censored because she is on the other team. Politics as usual.
Actually no, she broke Rule XIX.

http://www.rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXIX

This is a rule that has been around for 100 years, just because it's not enforced as much as it should be, doesn't mean what Warren did should have not been punished.

The Democrats pull our laws for copyright infringement, so what's wrong with doing this?
#NotOneRedCent