Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
Are you serious? People are saying this T-shirt represent the strength of the corrupt Congresswoman Elizabeth Warren?!
Are you fucking kidding me? This woman is no Rosa Parks... also has anyone else noticed the imagery? WTF... why not just come out with another socialist symbol... oh wait... we did... Bernie Sanders...
Are you fucking kidding me? This woman is no Rosa Parks... also has anyone else noticed the imagery? WTF... why not just come out with another socialist symbol... oh wait... we did... Bernie Sanders...
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:57 pm
Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
That's great. Warren is an even nastier dingbat than Hillary. Let her be the next D nominee pls
Last edited by Dand on Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am
Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
There is no reason to believe she was silenced because she is a woman, unless you view every issue through the lens of gender.
Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.
Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
She was censured for this time because she slandered a person on the congressional floor... which is not allowed. It had nothing to do with her gender, or even race (Indian or Caucasian)... it had to do with her opening her mouth at the wrong time at the right place...apeman wrote:There is no reason to believe she was silenced because she is a woman, unless you view every issue through the lens of gender.
Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.
I wish the censure was permanent...
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
Dand wrote:That's great. Warren is an even nastier dingbat than Hillary. Let her be the next D nominee pls
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
You guys are trans-racists.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
Yeah, I am seeing that stuff in what is left of my progressive friends on Facebook. I think I might try to burn a few more bridges with this one.
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am
Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
She was censored because she is on the other team. Politics as usual.The Conservative wrote:She was censured for this time because she slandered a person on the congressional floor... which is not allowed. It had nothing to do with her gender, or even race (Indian or Caucasian)... it had to do with her opening her mouth at the wrong time at the right place...apeman wrote:There is no reason to believe she was silenced because she is a woman, unless you view every issue through the lens of gender.
Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.
I wish the censure was permanent...
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
You mean she wasn't censored because of her vagina??
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!
Actually no, she broke Rule XIX.apeman wrote:She was censored because she is on the other team. Politics as usual.The Conservative wrote:She was censured for this time because she slandered a person on the congressional floor... which is not allowed. It had nothing to do with her gender, or even race (Indian or Caucasian)... it had to do with her opening her mouth at the wrong time at the right place...apeman wrote:There is no reason to believe she was silenced because she is a woman, unless you view every issue through the lens of gender.
Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.
I wish the censure was permanent...
http://www.rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXIX
This is a rule that has been around for 100 years, just because it's not enforced as much as it should be, doesn't mean what Warren did should have not been punished.
The Democrats pull our laws for copyright infringement, so what's wrong with doing this?
#NotOneRedCent