The case for states' rights
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:05 pm
The case for states' rights
Thought I'd start a thread for informative discussion on the benefits and drawbacks of this common topic. I'm generally tend to advocate for a smaller, more localized government but also realize the logistical drawbacks to this general policy. So, what are the best arguments for and against states' rights?
Seek how to think, not what to think.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: The case for states' rights
I was just talking to someone that is far more learned on the subject that seems to maintain the Articles of Confederation were superior to the Constitution. I'm still a bit sceptical because the Constitution only mandates a few federalist proponents, those being mainly marshal in character to my knowledge.
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: The case for states' rights
If you don't care about effectiveness, the Articles are great! If you're all in for extreme decentralization, then the Articles would work fine. If you want a cohesive government that can enforce its laws, go with the Constitution.TheReal_ND wrote:I was just talking to someone that is far more learned on the subject that seems to maintain the Articles of Confederation were superior to the Constitution. I'm still a bit sceptical because the Constitution only mandates a few federalist proponents, those being mainly marshal in character to my knowledge.
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:05 pm
Re: The case for states' rights
Yeah, so if the bulk of the nations' laws were dictated by individual states, logistically, how would that work? If potentially every law was different in potentially every state, movement between states would be so difficult as to limit mobility between them. Maybe I've just gotta read all the Articles together...Xenophon wrote:If you don't care about effectiveness, the Articles are great! If you're all in for extreme decentralization, then the Articles would work fine. If you want a cohesive government that can enforce its laws, go with the Constitution.TheReal_ND wrote:I was just talking to someone that is far more learned on the subject that seems to maintain the Articles of Confederation were superior to the Constitution. I'm still a bit sceptical because the Constitution only mandates a few federalist proponents, those being mainly marshal in character to my knowledge.
Seek how to think, not what to think.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: The case for states' rights
I've read arguments in defense of the articles. There are some valid points. For one, for all of the talk about how ineffectual the articles were, we did win independence under them.TheReal_ND wrote:I was just talking to someone that is far more learned on the subject that seems to maintain the Articles of Confederation were superior to the Constitution. I'm still a bit sceptical because the Constitution only mandates a few federalist proponents, those being mainly marshal in character to my knowledge.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: The case for states' rights
I never read a good argument against them. I usually encounter the official narrative as we read here, which does not contain any evidence to support it.
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: The case for states' rights
Pretty much.Xenophon wrote:If you don't care about effectiveness, the Articles are great! If you're all in for extreme decentralization, then the Articles would work fine. If you want a cohesive government that can enforce its laws, go with the Constitution.TheReal_ND wrote:I was just talking to someone that is far more learned on the subject that seems to maintain the Articles of Confederation were superior to the Constitution. I'm still a bit sceptical because the Constitution only mandates a few federalist proponents, those being mainly marshal in character to my knowledge.
If you want a lose confederation of states, like looser than the EU, go for the Articles.
There's no way the US would have gained global hegemony without the Constitution, nor would have Manifest Destiny been realized. We'd be a hodgepodge of semi-losers like South America
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: The case for states' rights
That's not a certainty. We're a lot different than them culturally and always have been.AndrewBennett wrote:Pretty much.Xenophon wrote:If you don't care about effectiveness, the Articles are great! If you're all in for extreme decentralization, then the Articles would work fine. If you want a cohesive government that can enforce its laws, go with the Constitution.TheReal_ND wrote:I was just talking to someone that is far more learned on the subject that seems to maintain the Articles of Confederation were superior to the Constitution. I'm still a bit sceptical because the Constitution only mandates a few federalist proponents, those being mainly marshal in character to my knowledge.
If you want a lose confederation of states, like looser than the EU, go for the Articles.
There's no way the US would have gained global hegemony without the Constitution, nor would have Manifest Destiny been realized. We'd be a hodgepodge of semi-losers like South America
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751