My guess is the next person to come forward will be a former frat bro that Kavanaugh teabagged when the dude passed out during pledge week.DBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:30 pmThey need to put up a public website asking if any other women vaguely remembers a guy who has the remotest possibility of being Kavanaugh doing something kinda sexual towards them any time in the last 50 years.
Maybe his mom will bust him out for trying to bite her on the titty 53 years ago.
FBI should look into it.
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:33 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
“I've got a phone that allows me to convene Americans from every walk of life, nonprofits, businesses, the private sector, universities to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme..." - Obama
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
That fucker is DKE. That's the least of his homo activity.kybkh wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:33 pmMy guess is the next person to come forward will be a former frat bro that Kavanaugh teabagged when the dude passed out during pledge week.DBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:30 pmThey need to put up a public website asking if any other women vaguely remembers a guy who has the remotest possibility of being Kavanaugh doing something kinda sexual towards them any time in the last 50 years.
Maybe his mom will bust him out for trying to bite her on the titty 53 years ago.
FBI should look into it.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I just saw on the Twitter that the V-card is going to be his defense on Faux News this afternoon at 6pm Central time.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Most FOXNews watchers believe Ford?
Not good.
That means all of MSNBC and CNN viewers probably do too. Who knew a hazy memory from 35 years ago, devoid of time or place, contradictory in number of participants, and rejected by every other named witness of the event - could be so convincing?
Clearly I’m the crazy one here.
Everyone else knows the truth when they see it, and it looks like this.
Ugh.
Not good.
That means all of MSNBC and CNN viewers probably do too. Who knew a hazy memory from 35 years ago, devoid of time or place, contradictory in number of participants, and rejected by every other named witness of the event - could be so convincing?
Clearly I’m the crazy one here.
Everyone else knows the truth when they see it, and it looks like this.
Ugh.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
That's cool but if that's the hang up then people should be honest about that not believing these allegations because you have another axe to grind.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:02 ami believe fife has made a few posts explaining that kavanaugh is very pro-government surveillance and the vibe of the forum here is that he's a swamp pick
I'm not but what do we have here? A bunch of nothing. And an FBI investigation is going to turn up nothing.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:02 ami'm more willing to look the other way on the accusations in favor of having another pro-2nd amendment judge than i am to have another anti-abortion judge. whether or not one should be tarred and feathered with a SEXUAL OFFENDER label for what seem to be minor incidents is another storyMontegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:56 amIs it MAGA to not care whether your SC pick is a sexual offender so long as an anti abortion supporter gets selected?
Seems like some shitty double standards.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
We know and you don't. That's the problem.
The sky is blue, water is wet, a large portion of the population has been groped by an asshole, and another large portion is clueless about it.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Registered voters plus or minus 4% meaningless. Probably a phone poll conducted by a young college age women. If one of them walk up on me I am going to tell them whatever I think they want to hear. Cause why not? That group of older ladies on CNN, those I believe.DBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:12 pmMost FOXNews watchers believe Ford?
Not good.
That means all of MSNBC and CNN viewers probably do too. Who knew a hazy memory from 35 years ago, devoid of time or place, contradictory in number of participants, and rejected by every other named witness of the event - could be so convincing?
Clearly I’m the crazy one here.
Everyone else knows the truth when they see it, and it looks like this.
Ugh.