I wouldn't want to burden you with too much posting. It might be too much like work.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:22 pmDo you want to have conversations with me or do you want to go back on ignore?
I've given you a chance but if you are just going back to the same old shit I won't bother.
Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
It's not work when I enjoy it. If it is just abuse for the sake of abuse I can't be bothered.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:23 pmI wouldn't want to burden you with too much posting. It might be too much like work.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:22 pmDo you want to have conversations with me or do you want to go back on ignore?
I've given you a chance but if you are just going back to the same old shit I won't bother.
There's a reason that there are so few of us left. In 3 days time I will have known you lot for exactly 4 years. Why you have to treat some people the way you do still eludes me.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
This was a refuge. We were cast out from Eden. People leaving here isn't a failure, it is an evolution. You want people to abandon family obligations to save the Earth and this forum. That's going to be a hard no, dog.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:30 pmIt's not work when I enjoy it. If it is just abuse for the sake of abuse I can't be bothered.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:23 pmI wouldn't want to burden you with too much posting. It might be too much like work.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:22 pmDo you want to have conversations with me or do you want to go back on ignore?
I've given you a chance but if you are just going back to the same old shit I won't bother.
There's a reason that there are so few of us left. In 3 days time I will have known you lot for exactly 4 years. Why you have to treat some people the way you do still eludes me.
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
No. I'd like people to change their habits and reduce their excessive consumerism.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:54 pmThis was a refuge. We were cast out from Eden. People leaving here isn't a failure, it is an evolution. You want people to abandon family obligations to save the Earth and this forum. That's going to be a hard no, dog.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:30 pmIt's not work when I enjoy it. If it is just abuse for the sake of abuse I can't be bothered.
There's a reason that there are so few of us left. In 3 days time I will have known you lot for exactly 4 years. Why you have to treat some people the way you do still eludes me.
I don't have dependents and have a simple life so it is easier for me but everyone can do their bit.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 4106
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
So nothing. Got it. Just own it instead of pretending.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:31 pmThe conversation moves on. Some posts get left behind.Haumana wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:07 pmExcuse you? You answered a few other posts since mine. #victimcard notedMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 5:41 pm
Well, excuse me for going to bed at 5.40am without answering your same question in a different form.
The point is to pass the costs on to the consumer. That's the whole point. The polluter pays.
That wasn't the point you started on. Your point was to tax the producer. That you can't name one tax that doesn't involve a credit or exception is also noted. So the average joe is the polluter, in your mind, and not the ebil corporations?
Of course the consumer is the polluter. Who else could it be?
As for credits or exceptions, fuck that. The polluter pays, no exceptions.
Tax the producers, they reduce emissions to outcompete or they pass it on and perish.
Want to avoid carbon tax? Reduce your consumption.
I lived off about £5k last year. Jobs are jails.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
So we go back about a couple decades. No thanks.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:02 pmNo. I'd like people to change their habits and reduce their excessive consumerism.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:54 pmThis was a refuge. We were cast out from Eden. People leaving here isn't a failure, it is an evolution. You want people to abandon family obligations to save the Earth and this forum. That's going to be a hard no, dog.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 7:30 pm
It's not work when I enjoy it. If it is just abuse for the sake of abuse I can't be bothered.
There's a reason that there are so few of us left. In 3 days time I will have known you lot for exactly 4 years. Why you have to treat some people the way you do still eludes me.
I don't have dependents and have a simple life so it is easier for me but everyone can do their bit.
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
Is that an argument?Haumana wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:09 pmSo nothing. Got it. Just own it instead of pretending.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:31 pmThe conversation moves on. Some posts get left behind.Haumana wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:07 pm
Excuse you? You answered a few other posts since mine. #victimcard noted
That wasn't the point you started on. Your point was to tax the producer. That you can't name one tax that doesn't involve a credit or exception is also noted. So the average joe is the polluter, in your mind, and not the ebil corporations?
Of course the consumer is the polluter. Who else could it be?
As for credits or exceptions, fuck that. The polluter pays, no exceptions.
Tax the producers, they reduce emissions to outcompete or they pass it on and perish.
Want to avoid carbon tax? Reduce your consumption.
I lived off about £5k last year. Jobs are jails.
Am I pretending to have an opinion? It's not very clear what you are saying. I've outlined what I think is a possible way to reduce CO2 output.
How would you suggest we do it?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
You think living at 50% below the poverty line is a remote possibility?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:44 pmIs that an argument?Haumana wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:09 pmSo nothing. Got it. Just own it instead of pretending.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:31 pm
The conversation moves on. Some posts get left behind.
Of course the consumer is the polluter. Who else could it be?
As for credits or exceptions, fuck that. The polluter pays, no exceptions.
Tax the producers, they reduce emissions to outcompete or they pass it on and perish.
Want to avoid carbon tax? Reduce your consumption.
I lived off about £5k last year. Jobs are jails.
Am I pretending to have an opinion? It's not very clear what you are saying. I've outlined what I think is a possible way to reduce CO2 output.
How would you suggest we do it?
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
I think I've proved it.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:01 pmYou think living at 50% below the poverty line is a remote possibility?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:44 pmIs that an argument?
Am I pretending to have an opinion? It's not very clear what you are saying. I've outlined what I think is a possible way to reduce CO2 output.
How would you suggest we do it?
Standard of living is often just another way of saying materialism.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
Tell that to the socialist.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:21 pmI think I've proved it.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 12:01 pmYou think living at 50% below the poverty line is a remote possibility?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:44 pm
Is that an argument?
Am I pretending to have an opinion? It's not very clear what you are saying. I've outlined what I think is a possible way to reduce CO2 output.
How would you suggest we do it?
Standard of living is often just another way of saying materialism.