-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu May 07, 2020 1:47 pm
Hastur wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 1:40 pm
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 10:14 am
I don't want to see Trump die from the bug no matter how deliciously ironic that would be.
I am looking forward to the epic Twitter rants after his defeat in the November elections.
I will get much more pleasure from his failure than from his death.
I want him to live to a hundred so that he can watch Fox News turn against him and acurately describe his regime as the worst Presidency in living memory.
I want to see him replaced by a President with dementia so that he knows that the people considered even a senile old sex pest was a better choice than 4 more years of Trump.
I'm deranged like that...
Do you really want Biden for president? How does that even compute? Biden is a senile sexual predator. TDS is strong in this one.
No, I want him to choose a black female as his VP and then retire due to health issues.
The wailing and gnashing of teeth which will ensue will keep me amused for years to follow.
Given a straight choice between Trump or Biden, I would still prefer the moderate, senile, sex pest over the bigotted, senile, sex pest though.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu May 07, 2020 1:52 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 1:42 pm
It's such a ridiculous choice.
Tulsi should run third party.
Tulsi Gabbard 2020
"Not for rape"
It's a marginally better choice than Hillary or Trump.
There is something seriously wrong with a system that keeps coming up with such dreadful choices though.
I thought Corbyn v Boris was bad enough but it seems perfectly acceptable in comparison.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed May 27, 2020 7:02 am
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/tech/2020 ... 265036002/
LOL.
That's how to get Trump to rage quit Twitter.
Maybe he'll go back to making public announcements the old fashioned way now. At a press conference where he has to face questions and be accountable for his words.
Oh well, at least he's admitted HCQ is actually dangerous by no longer taking it. Small steps...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Wed May 27, 2020 7:17 am
2020 Newspeak Guidelines of the Trumpinist Commentariat
Free speech = When government shuts down media.
Anti-Free Speech = When media fact checks an account held by the government.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed May 27, 2020 7:27 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 7:17 am
2020 Newspeak Guidelines of the Trumpinist Commentariat
Free speech = When government shuts down media.
Anti-Free Speech = When media fact checks an account held by the government.
Exactly, Trump is threatening to heavily regulate or shut down social media in the name of protecting free speech even though he has no authority to do it. That would have to go through Congress.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Wed May 27, 2020 8:52 am
Technically speaking, even the US Congress wouldn't be able to mandate the realization of Chairman Trump's latest asinine, freedom-hating, hypersensitive public temper tantrum.
But hey... people here like him because he also trolls the left. I look forward to when in ten years, the overton window has shifted even further to right in the US and it is
their views who will then be considered leftist. The memes will no doubt be glorious...
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed May 27, 2020 9:28 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 8:52 am
Technically speaking, even the US Congress wouldn't be able to mandate the realization of Chairman Trump's latest asinine, freedom-hating, hypersensitive public temper tantrum.
But hey... people here like him because he also trolls the left. I look forward to when in ten years, the overton window has shifted even further to right in the US and it is
their views who will then be considered leftist. The memes will no doubt be glorious...
What exactly did he say that was "freedom hating"?
#NotOneRedCent
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Wed May 27, 2020 9:42 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 9:28 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 8:52 am
Technically speaking, even the US Congress wouldn't be able to mandate the realization of Chairman Trump's latest asinine, freedom-hating, hypersensitive public temper tantrum.
But hey... people here like him because he also trolls the left. I look forward to when in ten years, the overton window has shifted even further to right in the US and it is
their views who will then be considered leftist. The memes will no doubt be glorious...
What exactly did he say that was "freedom hating"?
Read the article Monte linked to. He threatened to close down Twitter because they added a correction statement to some of his tweets. That’s apparantly a violation of Trump's "freedom of speech" (guy evidently has a Chinese understanding of what freedom of speech means).
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed May 27, 2020 9:55 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 9:42 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 9:28 am
BjornP wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 8:52 am
Technically speaking, even the US Congress wouldn't be able to mandate the realization of Chairman Trump's latest asinine, freedom-hating, hypersensitive public temper tantrum.
But hey... people here like him because he also trolls the left. I look forward to when in ten years, the overton window has shifted even further to right in the US and it is
their views who will then be considered leftist. The memes will no doubt be glorious...
What exactly did he say that was "freedom hating"?
Read the article Monte linked to. He threatened to close down Twitter because they added a correction statement to some of his tweets. That’s apparantly a violation of Trump's "freedom of speech" (guy evidently has a Chinese understanding of what freedom of speech means).
Which tweets?
#NotOneRedCent
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Wed May 27, 2020 10:06 am
Not sure how to embed here. Spend two seconds to google it yourself.
Ah, I'll just link directly:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta ... 1310739456
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.