-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:26 am
jediuser598 wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:
Welfare queens have the entire Democratic party machine essentially robbing from white males for their benefit in exchange for votes. The wealthy have to pay a lot of money for a similar privilege. What's more difficult for you personally: casting a vote or paying legislators a few million dollars each year?
So democrats are for the poor?
That's what I got from that.
LMFAO. Democrats are for power. The modern Democratic party is predicated upon the destruction of America and the mass fleecing of white men in exchange for control of the third world sectarian shit hole that results.
-
Smitty-48
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Post
by Smitty-48 » Sun Dec 03, 2017 3:46 pm
jediuser598 wrote:Well with these tax cuts coming in, the only way that we're going to pay for anything is printing more currency.
It's revenue neutral at 0.4% growth, pretty sure you're going to have at least 0.4% growth, "ZOMG the deficit!" is just partisan liberal bitch whining hackery, as if a bleeding heart lefty fuckwit pseudo commie like you gives a rats ass about balanced budgets; kill ur self.
If you were in charge, you would just go around in a helicopter dropping money on every race hustler sob story con artist in the country without any restraint whatsoever, you subhuman cockroach.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
jediuser598
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Post
by jediuser598 » Sun Dec 03, 2017 5:24 pm
Smitty-48 wrote:jediuser598 wrote:Well with these tax cuts coming in, the only way that we're going to pay for anything is printing more currency.
It's revenue neutral at 0.4% growth, pretty sure you're going to have at least 0.4% growth, "ZOMG the deficit!" is just partisan liberal bitch whining hackery, as if a bleeding heart lefty fuckwit pseudo commie like you gives a rats ass about balanced budgets; kill ur self.
If you were in charge, you would just go around in a helicopter dropping money on every race hustler sob story con artist in the country without any restraint whatsoever, you subhuman cockroach.
We'll see if it gets growth going.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Post
by StCapps » Sun Dec 03, 2017 5:27 pm
jediuser598 wrote:Smitty-48 wrote:jediuser598 wrote:Well with these tax cuts coming in, the only way that we're going to pay for anything is printing more currency.
It's revenue neutral at 0.4% growth, pretty sure you're going to have at least 0.4% growth, "ZOMG the deficit!" is just partisan liberal bitch whining hackery, as if a bleeding heart lefty fuckwit pseudo commie like you gives a rats ass about balanced budgets; kill ur self.
If you were in charge, you would just go around in a helicopter dropping money on every race hustler sob story con artist in the country without any restraint whatsoever, you subhuman cockroach.
We'll see if it gets growth going.
1.6% GDP growth in 2016, and this year you've cracked 3% GDP growth every quarter. Simmer down panic monkey, you ain't gonna dip below 0.4% GDP growth, what are you so worried about?
*yip*
-
jediuser598
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Post
by jediuser598 » Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:40 pm
StCapps wrote:jediuser598 wrote:Smitty-48 wrote:
It's revenue neutral at 0.4% growth, pretty sure you're going to have at least 0.4% growth, "ZOMG the deficit!" is just partisan liberal bitch whining hackery, as if a bleeding heart lefty fuckwit pseudo commie like you gives a rats ass about balanced budgets; kill ur self.
If you were in charge, you would just go around in a helicopter dropping money on every race hustler sob story con artist in the country without any restraint whatsoever, you subhuman cockroach.
We'll see if it gets growth going.
1.6% GDP growth in 2016, and this year you've cracked 3% GDP growth every quarter. Simmer down panic monkey, you ain't gonna dip below 0.4% GDP growth, what are you so worried about?
I believe Smitty is saying additional growth.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
Smitty-48
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Post
by Smitty-48 » Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:51 pm
jediuser598 wrote:StCapps wrote:jediuser598 wrote:
We'll see if it gets growth going.
1.6% GDP growth in 2016, and this year you've cracked 3% GDP growth every quarter. Simmer down panic monkey, you ain't gonna dip below 0.4% GDP growth, what are you so worried about?
I believe Smitty is saying additional growth.
Under the existing tax structure, you were projected to increase the deficit by $10 billion over the next ten years anyways, even if you didn't have any growth, these tax cuts would add an extra $1 billion to that, so I wouldn't lose any sleep over it, since you don't really care about deficits, and you're just a bitch hack who cries doom no matter what the Republicans do, because you are Blue Team and they are Red Team, and you don't like Red Team, because you're a fuckin' communist and they're not.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
jediuser598
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Post
by jediuser598 » Sun Dec 03, 2017 10:20 pm
Smitty-48 wrote:jediuser598 wrote:StCapps wrote:1.6% GDP growth in 2016, and this year you've cracked 3% GDP growth every quarter. Simmer down panic monkey, you ain't gonna dip below 0.4% GDP growth, what are you so worried about?
I believe Smitty is saying additional growth.
Under the existing tax structure, you were projected to increase the deficit by $10 billion over the next ten years anyways, even if you didn't have any growth, these tax cuts would add an extra $1 billion to that, so I wouldn't lose any sleep over it, since you don't really care about deficits, and you're just a bitch hack who cries doom no matter what the Republicans do, because you are Blue Team and they are Red Team, and you don't like Red Team, because you're a fuckin' communist and they're not.
If these tax cuts are revenue neutral then I'm all for it, but I doubt it. Guess we'll see.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Dec 03, 2017 10:34 pm
jediuser598 wrote:Smitty-48 wrote:jediuser598 wrote:
I believe Smitty is saying additional growth.
Under the existing tax structure, you were projected to increase the deficit by $10 billion over the next ten years anyways, even if you didn't have any growth, these tax cuts would add an extra $1 billion to that, so I wouldn't lose any sleep over it, since you don't really care about deficits, and you're just a bitch hack who cries doom no matter what the Republicans do, because you are Blue Team and they are Red Team, and you don't like Red Team, because you're a fuckin' communist and they're not.
If these tax cuts are revenue neutral then I'm all for it, but I doubt it. Guess we'll see.
CBO said something like an
additional few trillion in debt. But I'm sure it'll be fine. My kids will pay it off with magic money.
-
Smitty-48
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Post
by Smitty-48 » Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:20 pm
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
CBO said something like an additional few trillion in debt. But I'm sure it'll be fine. My kids will pay it off with magic money.
Statistically, at three years out, a CBO forecast is about as accurate as throwing darts at a wall, they're totally full of shit.
It's just more partisan hackery, and you Lefty cockroaches are only concerned about the deficit, when the Democrats are out of office, soon as the Democrats are back in, you'll start complaining because they're not spending like drunken sailors on a commie welfare police state.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:22 pm
Smitty-48 wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
CBO said something like an additional few trillion in debt. But I'm sure it'll be fine. My kids will pay it off with magic money.
Statistically, at three years out, a CBO forecast is about as accurate as throwing darts at a wall, they're totally full of shit.
You have any data for that? Because their estimates are usually too optimistic. They’re basing tax revenue on a 5% growth rate, which is patently absurd.