A drinking buddy there for sure.Smitty-48 wrote:Meh, never found her to be particularly hot nor classy, when it comes to royal pussy, more of a Princess Margaret man me self.Montegriffo wrote:That would have been one classy pussy to grab.
USA vs. Canada
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: USA vs. Canada
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: USA vs. Canada
I'd have happily been her gentleman pool boy on Mustique, and I'm sure there would have been some spliffs being passed around with those Martinis as well. Her royal highness, of getting down and dirty; schwing.Montegriffo wrote:A drinking buddy there for sure.Smitty-48 wrote:Meh, never found her to be particularly hot nor classy, when it comes to royal pussy, more of a Princess Margaret man me self.Montegriffo wrote:That would have been one classy pussy to grab.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: USA vs. Canada
And there's me thinking it was a different Margaret you wanted to do the horizontal gymnastics with.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: USA vs. Canada
Nah, that Maggie is my war chief, the Countess of Snowden, is my royal haughty naughtyMontegriffo wrote:And there's me thinking it was a different Margaret you wanted to do the horizontal gymnastics with.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: USA vs. Canada
More chance of getting the royal Maggie to turn, too.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: USA vs. Canada
Oh hell, gettin' a chubb dog just thinkin' about it...Montegriffo wrote:More chance of getting the royal Maggie to turn, too.
...when it comes to hot royal pussy, none of them is a match for the Countess in her heyday.

Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: USA vs. Canada
Who the fuck hijacked this thread with pictures of royal poon?
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: USA vs. Canada
Royal poon? That sir would get one of you colonials 10 lashes of the cat 'o' nine tails on the Royal Mall in front of a braying crowd.TheReal_ND wrote:Who the fuck hijacked this thread with pictures of royal poon?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: USA vs. Canada
1776
feels good man.

-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: USA vs. Canada
Ah yes, July 4th or thanksgiving day as we call it over here.TheReal_ND wrote:1776feels good man.

For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.

