USA vs. Canada

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by Montegriffo »

Smitty-48 wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:That would have been one classy pussy to grab.
Meh, never found her to be particularly hot nor classy, when it comes to royal pussy, more of a Princess Margaret man me self.

Image
A drinking buddy there for sure.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by Smitty-48 »

Montegriffo wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:That would have been one classy pussy to grab.
Meh, never found her to be particularly hot nor classy, when it comes to royal pussy, more of a Princess Margaret man me self.
A drinking buddy there for sure.
I'd have happily been her gentleman pool boy on Mustique, and I'm sure there would have been some spliffs being passed around with those Martinis as well. Her royal highness, of getting down and dirty; schwing.
Nec Aspera Terrent
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by Montegriffo »

And there's me thinking it was a different Margaret you wanted to do the horizontal gymnastics with.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by Smitty-48 »

Montegriffo wrote:And there's me thinking it was a different Margaret you wanted to do the horizontal gymnastics with.
Nah, that Maggie is my war chief, the Countess of Snowden, is my royal haughty naughty
Nec Aspera Terrent
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by Montegriffo »

More chance of getting the royal Maggie to turn, too.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by Smitty-48 »

Montegriffo wrote:More chance of getting the royal Maggie to turn, too.
Oh hell, gettin' a chubb dog just thinkin' about it...

...when it comes to hot royal pussy, none of them is a match for the Countess in her heyday.

Image
Nec Aspera Terrent
User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26048
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by TheReal_ND »

Who the fuck hijacked this thread with pictures of royal poon?
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by Montegriffo »

TheReal_ND wrote:Who the fuck hijacked this thread with pictures of royal poon?
Royal poon? That sir would get one of you colonials 10 lashes of the cat 'o' nine tails on the Royal Mall in front of a braying crowd.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26048
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by TheReal_ND »

1776 8-) feels good man.
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: USA vs. Canada

Post by Montegriffo »

TheReal_ND wrote:1776 8-) feels good man.
Ah yes, July 4th or thanksgiving day as we call it over here. :lol:
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image