Speaker to Animals wrote: Sat Jun 02, 2018 6:37 pm
MilSpecs wrote: Sat Jun 02, 2018 6:32 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: Sat Jun 02, 2018 11:17 am
Equating male circumcision with FMG is a tactical and rhetorical mistake.
It’s a factual mistake. The male equivalent would make it difficult for humans to reproduce.
It's more than that. FGM removes a sexual function from a woman's body. These women receive little pleasure from sexual intercourse.
Not disagreeing, but we can’t reproduce without male pleasure. Not easily. That was my point.