Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

[Alexander PhiAlipson]

Read more, write less.

Suck more dicks?

Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander; if it works for your wife, it'll work for you.

[Okeefenokee]

Read more, write less.

Suck more dicks?

Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander; if it works for your wife, it'll work for you.

[TheReal_ND]

How will he ever recover?

[clubgop]

That's great. Warren is an even nastier dingbat than Hillary. Let her be the next D nominee pls

You mean her true self?

No. I am actually serious with this. I half suspect she is possessed.

Actually no, she broke Rule XIX.

http://www.rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXIX

This is a rule that has been around for 100 years, just because it's not enforced as much as it should be, doesn't mean what Warren did should have not been punished.

The Democrats pull our laws for copyright infringement, so what's wrong with doing this?

that was my reaction too when I read an article in the MSM about this yesterday. It kept emphasizing how this rule has not been used very often and implying that therefore the Republicans are being especially sexist and mean.

I've got another interpretation, maybe Elizabeth Warren is such a nasty bitch that she can't follow a rule if it requires her to act with some decency. If this rule is being "historically" used then it's because she managed to be a "historic" bitch. Congrats, Liz.

Dislike her politics all you want, but such name calling and deliberate obtuseness, is doing all of you no favors.

By being so deliberately insulting after a woman from the minority party is reading actual witness testimony from a black woman about a cabinet candidate's actual racism who was then stopped using a rule which is hardy ever enforced, merely enforces the suggestion that she was wrongly silenced.

You do know she is a SJW/corporatist in true prog clothing, right? Overall on the politics you are right but this is a tempest in a teapot you ride this for next week and a half tops.

[clubgop]

Suck more dicks?

Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander; if it works for your wife, it'll work for you.

From one poet to another

Hypocrisy doesn't even cover Dirty dick for crying home to his safe room cause I alliterate in iambic pentameter on a message board, railing on about civility but Sen. from state that look like crow nest, can apparently say whatev the fuck about another Senator on the Senate fucking floor.

[PartyOf5]

Alveda King sees this for what it is:
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/mlks- ... ion-video/

Unfortunately for Warren, Alveda King, the niece of MLK Jr., wasn’t too happy about the usage either.

She told Fox’s Neil Cavuto that, “In that letter [Coretta Scott King] would be referring to some of [Sen. Jeff Sessions] comments,” Alveda King said. “However, she would agree today that he of course ended some [school segregation and] he worked to prosecute members of the KKK.”

“It’s almost like a bait and switch, stir up the emotions, in the name of King — and my name is Alveda King — … [and] play the race card, which she was attempting to do,” she added.

Alveda King said, while the issue is certainly divisive in Washington, D.C., it has not caused any problems within the King family.

“We are taking a look at many things that Mrs. Coretta Scott King said, Martin Luther King Jr., my daddy A.D. King,” she told Cavuto. “But our family — we are peacemakers, we bring people together, … we do not divide people.”



Read more: http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/mlks- ... z4YOTIQEQr
Follow us: @TheLibRepublic on Twitter

[Penner]

In this case, the woman literally slandered another member of the Senate.

The left thinks beating women in the face with a flag pole is a "protest", and slandering people with obvious lies and horseshit is "speaking your mind", and you still can't figure out why the democratic party is collapsing.

Good to know that you're so informed on senate rules. She was reading an open letter concerning Sessions, from years ago. That's not quite the same thing as calling him a dickbag.

You didn't watch the video, or you're lying.

Everyone gets three guesses.

Actually, if you watch and follow, she was quoting from a source, which was one letter that Coretta Scott King (the widow of Martain Luther King) wrote, that literally convinced Congress to not give Sessions the position of federal judge, 30 years ago (written in 1986 when the Republicans had the Senate majority and the Dems controlled the House). It's not slander if she is quoting from the letter, which is what she was doing at the time she got censored. This all reeks of political censoring/maneuvering on the Republicans part to get Sessions nominated as AG.

Here is the letter:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... ocument/p1

[Okeefenokee]

Good to know that you're so informed on senate rules. She was reading an open letter concerning Sessions, from years ago. That's not quite the same thing as calling him a dickbag.

You didn't watch the video, or you're lying.

Everyone gets three guesses.

Actually, if you watch and follow, she was quoting from a source, which was one letter that Coretta Scott King (the widow of Martain Luther King) wrote, that literally convinced Congress to not give Sessions the position of federal judge, 30 years ago (written in 1986 when the Republicans had the Senate majority and the Dems controlled the House). It's not slander if she is quoting from the letter, which is what she was doing at the time she got censored. This all reeks of political censoring/maneuvering on the Republicans part to get Sessions nominated as AG.

Here is the letter:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... ocument/p1

You're full of shit, Penner. You are one hundred percent full of fucking shit. She fucking was not quoting from a letter that entire time, you dishonest hack.

[jbird4049]

That's great. Warren is an even nastier dingbat than Hillary. Let her be the next D nominee pls

No. I am actually serious with this. I half suspect she is possessed.

that was my reaction too when I read an article in the MSM about this yesterday. It kept emphasizing how this rule has not been used very often and implying that therefore the Republicans are being especially sexist and mean.

I've got another interpretation, maybe Elizabeth Warren is such a nasty bitch that she can't follow a rule if it requires her to act with some decency. If this rule is being "historically" used then it's because she managed to be a "historic" bitch. Congrats, Liz.

Dislike her politics all you want, but such name calling and deliberate obtuseness, is doing all of you no favors.

By being so deliberately insulting after a woman from the minority party is reading actual witness testimony from a black woman about a cabinet candidate's actual racism who was then stopped using a rule which is hardy ever enforced, merely enforces the suggestion that she was wrongly silenced.

You do know she is a SJW/corporatist in true prog clothing, right? Overall on the politics you are right but this is a tempest in a teapot you ride this for next week and a half tops.

I don't know, if she is a corporatist, but about the tempest I agree. One side are being big turkeys, the other whinny babies.

[Penner]

You didn't watch the video, or you're lying.

Everyone gets three guesses.

Actually, if you watch and follow, she was quoting from a source, which was one letter that Coretta Scott King (the widow of Martain Luther King) wrote, that literally convinced Congress to not give Sessions the position of federal judge, 30 years ago (written in 1986 when the Republicans had the Senate majority and the Dems controlled the House). It's not slander if she is quoting from the letter, which is what she was doing at the time she got censored. This all reeks of political censoring/maneuvering on the Republicans part to get Sessions nominated as AG.

Here is the letter:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... ocument/p1

You're full of shit, Penner. You are one hundred percent full of fucking shit. She fucking was not quoting from a letter that entire time, you dishonest hack.

I can post that video again, but she was quoting/reading from the letter when she got censored.