Castle review thread.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

Just got back from a few days at the end of the world or the far tip of Cornwall as it's also known.
As far away from where I live as you can go and still be in England. Over 10 hrs drive, the first half of which is mind-numbingly dull but with this old pile of rocks mid-way to make it a bit more interesting.
Image
Didn't even have to stop and get out of the car as the road goes right beside it.
Image

The main reason for my visit was to go sailing in my mate's new yacht.
A Sadler 25 for those interested in boats.
We wanted to go to the Isles of Scilly but the wind was against us so we settled for a short sail down the coast from Falmouth to the beautiful river Helsford where we spent the next day playing poker and drinking while it rained almost non-stop.
Image
Then a nice sail back to Falmouth with the wind behind us.
Followed by a couple of days looking at 'old shit'.
First a trip to Pendennis castle. Built by Henry VIII to protect Falmouth from the sneaky Spanish.
Image
A little modern for me, I like my castles to be 12th -14th century, before the age of gunpowder, so a 16th century one like Pendennis wouldn't normally get my juices going but it was still a good day out.
Image
Image
Next day we went for a walk to a remote Iron Age hillfort called Chun Castle. That was a bit older at around 2,500 years old.
Image
Not a great deal left of it but a stunning bit of scenery on the walk up to it.
On the way to it we passed a Neolithic quoit which is an ancient burial mount consisting of a 3 or 4 ton rock balancing on some other rocks which had somehow managed to not fall off for around 4,500 years.
Image

All in all a week well spent even accounting for the fact that 2 days were spent driving.

Oh yeah, we spotted this beauty on the walk back from the hillfort. An adder, our only venomous snake in the UK. Around 2 foot long and a more colourful green and yellow than the photo shows.
Image
Not likely to kill you if treated but more than enough to spoil your day.
An old friend of mine spent 5 days in hospital in a lot of pain after being bitten by one.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

Oh, before you go on about how stupid it was to build a road right beside Stonehenge. That road was probably there first. Blame the deer!
This is a cross section of it (the A303).
Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Beautiful stuff the Neolithic monuments are staggering. I’m really starting to consider the lost civilization theory.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

SuburbanFarmer wrote: Fri Jul 26, 2024 7:37 am Beautiful stuff the Neolithic monuments are staggering. I’m really starting to consider the lost civilization theory.
This is what the hillfort may have looked like.
Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
High Plains Biker
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:47 pm

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by High Plains Biker »

Awesome! Killer photos!
Catholic, conservative, veteran, prepper, gun owner, Rosary extremist, if I wasn't on a watch list, I'd be insulted!
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

High Plains Biker wrote: Fri Jul 26, 2024 8:34 am Awesome! Killer photos!
Thanks.
Not my pics though. My forward facing camera on my phone is knackered so I have to use the selfie camera. That usually involves taking numerous images of my thumb.
Images are from Google apart from the adder.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

C-Mag wrote: Wed May 29, 2019 11:31 am
Montegriffo wrote: Wed May 29, 2019 11:21 am
C-Mag wrote: Wed May 29, 2019 11:10 am Looks like you have some work ahead of you. Keep the pics coming.

French Senate says, Stop, just Stop we are going to do this right.
"On Monday evening, the French Senate approved the government's Notre-Dame restoration bill -- but added a clause that it must be restored to the state it was before the blaze, striking a blow to the government which had launched an international architecture competition to debate ideas on the restoration."


No greenhouses, no swimming pools, no minarets. Vive la France !
I'll go back again in Autumn.
Should be able to finish off the garden then.
After my Guedelon fuck up I'm going to visit on the way down next time. I bet the masons and carpenters there will know something about Notre-Dame.
Looks like the place hasn't been neglected for awhile. How long have you been going there.


Yeah, I'm sure the Guedelon craftsman are going to have a big hand in the ND restoration.
I'm so glad they are doing a restoration, and barring some 21st C architect from ruining it. Not just because of the final product, but I think it's an awesome responsibility to highlight and show mostly extinct techniques and skills.
So, just over 5 years to restore Notre Dame. Well, to reopen. The work is scheduled to go on into 2026.
I must admit I thought that was over ambitious when Macron said that.
A few compromises to the roof timbers by the look of all the iron work on the beams.
Image

Many of the stone masons from Guedelon did work on Notre Dame during the off season. The cold and wet winter weather makes the use of traditional lime mortar at the castle impossible. I suppose they were able to work all year round on the cathedral with the use of plastic sheeting and maybe even heating. They did have a billion dollars to spend. Might even have used modern cements maybe?
1,300 cubic meters of new limestone was needed as so much was damaged by the fire.

Some fuddy duddery exists over the stained glass windows.
In a controversial decision, French President Macron has launched a plan to replace 19th-century stained-glass windows at Notre Dame Cathedral with contemporary designs, despite the windows not being damaged during the fire. While the windows are not original, replacing them evokes past controversies surrounding modern window installations in the 1930s, highlighting a recurring tension between preservation and artistic innovation. The project continues despite significant opposition.
Also some concerns about over cleaning the interior and loss of 'patina'.
The Notre Dame interior restoration addressed fire damage and centuries of accumulated grime. Initial dusting removed lead dust from the collapsed vaults using specialized vacuums. Subsequently, a latex application and removal method cleaned the interior walls, revealing the original stone color. This technique, while used previously at St. Paul's Cathedral, generated concerns then and now regarding potential damage and the creation of an "artificially brightened" and ahistorical appearance. While the restoration body assures the goal is to restore original colors, not create a white interior, critics raise concerns about the prioritization of cleanliness over historical accuracy. The debate highlights the inherent tension between modern restoration techniques and preserving a monument's historical patina.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

I bet the details on the stained glass designs will spawn some internet theories.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

SuburbanFarmer wrote: Sun Dec 15, 2024 10:06 pm I bet the details on the stained glass designs will spawn some internet theories.
Must be bad, I can't even find any photos of the new designs.
The 19th century windows that are being replaced look a bit like Arabic geometric designs though. Too Muslim for modern right wing France?

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Montegriffo wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2024 6:15 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Sun Dec 15, 2024 10:06 pm I bet the details on the stained glass designs will spawn some internet theories.
Must be bad, I can't even find any photos of the new designs.
The 19th century windows that are being replaced look a bit like Arabic geometric designs though. Too Muslim for modern right wing France?

Image
More likely that Macron wants some Baphomet imagery included :lol:
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0