No, but seriously, I'm like 6'3". Should probably join a gym though, that 250 isn't a whole lot of muscle. I could try keto like some of the ladies here, drop a few pounds.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
Well this means the law no longer exists as it stands, which means the law has to be or can be removed. Yes?
I think for practical purposes as related to Health Insurance yes.
But let's not celebrate.
Obamacare was never about Health Care, at best it was about health insurance and letting the government get involved deeper into your healthcare than it's ever been. Unless the law is repealed all those little strings that were in the law that linked your healthcare to the government are still in there. They may be dormant, but get any of the 20 Dem candidates in the Whitehouse and they will be activated. The entire law needs to be repealed to get any kind of real meaningful victory.
Obamacare failed to even protect children from turkey sandwiches that were carelessly packed by inattentive mothers. Everything needs to be handled by the state from now on so that everybody gets their fair share and nobody goes without.
Speaker to Animals wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:06 pm
Obamacare failed to even protect children from turkey sandwiches that were carelessly packed by inattentive mothers. Everything needs to be handled by the state from now on so that everybody gets their fair share and nobody goes without.
Yes, we could nationalize farms to ensure more food for everyone.
Speaker to Animals wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:06 pm
Obamacare failed to even protect children from turkey sandwiches that were carelessly packed by inattentive mothers. Everything needs to be handled by the state from now on so that everybody gets their fair share and nobody goes without.
Yes, we could nationalize farms to ensure more food for everyone.
Speaker to Animals wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:06 pm
Obamacare failed to even protect children from turkey sandwiches that were carelessly packed by inattentive mothers. Everything needs to be handled by the state from now on so that everybody gets their fair share and nobody goes without.
Yes, we could nationalize farms to ensure more food for everyone.
Hell no...
No, it will be great.
Current farmers will be retrained in other tasks they are more adept at. Then we will take out of work inner cities minorities and put them on the land while teaching them new and better farming techniques.
Yes, we could nationalize farms to ensure more food for everyone.
Hell no...
No, it will be great.
Current farmers will be retrained in other tasks they are more adept at. Then we will take out of work inner cities minorities and put them on the land while teaching them new and better farming techniques.
Pfft, sorry but just like a Dr. a farmer should not be forced to do something.
No, it will be great.
Current farmers will be retrained in other tasks they are more adept at. Then we will take out of work inner cities minorities and put them on the land while teaching them new and better farming techniques.
Pfft, sorry but just like a Dr. a farmer should not be forced to do something.
Wrong.
If the farmers are not producing the most productive food to feed the poor and homeless, they need to go. We can find other labor for them. Besides, farmers have far more wealth in land than the average person, they need to share that with the poor.
We will take the poor, give them a fair portion of land to farm, then the total of the farmland will be more productive and we will have fewer hungry people.
