DACA
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: DACA
I guess the drug lords who run Mexico weren't so happy about people making shows that depict the violence they perpetrate.
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/09/ ... ed-mexico/
Can't wait for more of that here, fam!
http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/09/ ... ed-mexico/
Can't wait for more of that here, fam!
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: DACA
San Jacinto to be exact. Our ancestors came down the hill with the morning sun behind their backs. With hatchets, bowies, muskets and raccoon hats the blood curdling cries inspired terror in the imperial ranks. Convinced that his time on this world was rapidly coming to an end, General Santa Ana retreaded behind a Mesquite tree where he was soon found by keen eyed trackers. His sword was surrendered and back in Independence, TX, where our Declaration of Independence was signed, children celebrated by bashing piñatas, in the shape of sombrero clad Mexican laborers, into smitherines.ssu wrote:Ummm....didn't this already happen in the part that was Mexico where Nukedog now lives???
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: DACA
Oh, so for reasons, we should think of less than 700,000 as 4,000,000. I would love to look that research up and see how they arrived at that number, but your favorite blog didn't link that information.
They did have a long quote from the Migration Policy Institute about unaccompanied minors, which are different than minors brought in by their parents, but that is the sort of detail ignoring, subject changing, panic mongering without sources we have come to know and love from the big B.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: DACA
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:Oh, so for reasons, we should think of less than 700,000 as 4,000,000. I would love to look that research up and see how they arrived at that number, but your favorite blog didn't link that information.
They did have a long quote from the Migration Policy Institute about unaccompanied minors, which are different than minors brought in by their parents, but that is the sort of detail ignoring, subject changing, panic mongering without sources we have come to know and love from the big B.
The "reasons" were explained in the article. It's called chained immigration and apparently once you let one of them in, there are all sorts of programs for them to help their family get here too. It's a racket!
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: DACA
I didn't need a research paper to tell you that. I've worked with them my entire working life and could have told you that.
It's kind of funny though. The landscaper pays them cash, they send the cash back to Mexico and we subsidize their local families with foodstamps and welfare. When you think about it, it's the biggest racket that's ever existed. Possibly bigger than the refugee racket in Europe.
It's kind of funny though. The landscaper pays them cash, they send the cash back to Mexico and we subsidize their local families with foodstamps and welfare. When you think about it, it's the biggest racket that's ever existed. Possibly bigger than the refugee racket in Europe.
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: DACA
The 'reasons' are asserted without evidence in the blog post.Speaker to Animals wrote:Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:Oh, so for reasons, we should think of less than 700,000 as 4,000,000. I would love to look that research up and see how they arrived at that number, but your favorite blog didn't link that information.
They did have a long quote from the Migration Policy Institute about unaccompanied minors, which are different than minors brought in by their parents, but that is the sort of detail ignoring, subject changing, panic mongering without sources we have come to know and love from the big B.
The "reasons" were explained in the article. It's called chained immigration and apparently once you let one of them in, there are all sorts of programs for them to help their family get here too. It's a racket!
Either way, if I were a savvy deal maker, I might use DACA (which has an ethical corner stone) to negotiate away some of those programs, should they actually exist, and actually do what the blog post claims.
Maybe focusing on that instead of an expensive, pointless border totem would be a better use of the art of deal making I have heard so much about.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: DACA
If StA had made the point as an anecdote, fine. Linking an ill researched, point obscuring, ill-sourced blog post is different.Nukedog wrote:I didn't need a research paper to tell you that. I've worked with them my entire working life and could have told you that.
It's kind of funny though. The landscaper pays them cash, they send the cash back to Mexico and we subsidize their local families with foodstamps and welfare. When you think about it, it's the biggest racket that's ever existed. Possibly bigger than the refugee racket in Europe.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen