Comey the Criminal Commie - You're Fired

[kybkh]

Surprised this is not appealing to anyone.

The story is:

1. The FBI has intel obtained from FSB showing that there was collusion between HRC Campaign and Loretta Lynch.

2. This intel along with Tarmac Lynch meeting caused Comey to state publicly even though Clinton broke laws she didn't show intent so she was innocent as opposed to Lynch doing so herself.

3. Anonymous sources say this is "fake news" planted by FSB to cause chaos and that no such collusion occurred and we are supposed to believe the rest of the FBI findings concerning Trump.

So it's all here. Collusion between Obama Justice Dept and HRC is confirmed an in order to deny it the media runs a story showing Comey to be a "nut job" and destroy the FBIs institutional credibility.

What the fuck timeline is this??

[ssu]

FBI has proof of Clinton-Lynch collusion. Republicans sitting on document for whatever reason. Before it can be made public "anonymous" sources "leak" that its fake news.

We must be real rubes..

In the supposed email, Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in private communication with a senior Clinton campaign staffer named Amanda Renteria during the campaign. The document indicated Lynch had told Renteria that she would not let the FBI investigation into Clinton go too far, according to people familiar with it.

How do we know its fake? Because the people accused of collusion said it was...

Wasserman Schultz and Benardo said in separate interviews with The Washington Post that they do not know each other and have never communicated. Renteria, in an interview, and people familiar with Lynch’s account said the two also do not know each other and have never communicated.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... b42f79038e

Selective reading of that article, kybkh:

First, there actually wasn't an example of the e-mail (from the article you give:)

The document, obtained by the FBI, was a piece of purported analysis by Russian intelligence, the people said. It referred to an email supposedly written by the then-chair of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), and sent to Leonard Benardo, an official with the Open Society Foundations, an organization founded by billionaire George Soros and dedicated to promoting democracy.

The Russian document did not contain a copy of the email, but it described some of the contents of the purported message.

Second, the FBI didn't find the email:

After the bureau first received the document, it attempted to use the source to obtain the referenced email but could not do so, these people said. The source that provided the document, they said, had previously supplied other information that the FBI was also unable to corroborate.

While it was conducting the Clinton email investigation, the FBI did not interview anyone mentioned in the Russian document about its claims. At the time, FBI agents were probing numerous hacking cases involving Democrats and other groups, but they never found an email like the one described in the document, these people said.

So it's not just the both Lynch & Renteria saying it didn't exist. But then, WaPo is fake news, right? Yet if so, why not then just stick to Breitbart?

Anyway, what the hell are you doing, kybkh? Talking about Russian intelligence documents?

Shouldn't you stick to Seth Rich and the 400 pound guy on a bed?

[kybkh]

Your desperation reeks my friend. REEEEEEEEEKS

Wonder why Clinton had PC "bleached".

Wonder why DNC refused to give FBI "hacked" server.

You are pathetic.

At least play the part of being the non-partisan you claim to be.

[TheReal_ND]

Dude... I can't even keep up with all this shit anymore. All the """gates""" are running together.

[ssu]

Besides kybh,

Let's assume it would be true. You seem not to get that possible collusion between the ruling party and people in the US government from that party isn't something totally at the level to the FBI as possible collusion with an foreign intelligence service entity as the FBI's mission statement is to deter any such activity in the US. And when there is a whole division in the FBI for counterintelligence...

FBI missions:

Protect the United States from terrorist attack
Protect the United States against foreign intelligence operations and espionage

Now you might want them to look at domestic ones, but hmm..., not going to happen.

And then after all, we know and nobody denies that Hillary got preferential treatment. That's why a number of DNC officials resigned, even if they were screaming Russia all the time there. But shouldn't come as a shock that parties aren't democratic and unbiased when picking their candidates.

Dude... I can't even keep up with all this shit anymore. All the """gates""" are running together.

YES! Correct.

[ssu]

Your desperation reeks my friend. REEEEEEEEEKS

Wonder why Clinton had PC "bleached".

Wonder why DNC refused to give FBI "hacked" server.

You are pathetic.

At least play the part of being the non-partisan you claim to be.

Says the person that thinks Flynn is in trouble because he was so good in his job and just wanted to reinvent the IC, that you so much hate and think is evil.

But nice that you start to refer to Russian intelligence documents.

[kybkh]

Your response of emojis says it all my friend.

[C-Mag]

Comey caught red handed

The FBI has illegally shared raw intelligence about Americans with unauthorized third parties and violated other constitutional privacy protections, according to newly declassified government documents that undercut the bureau’s public assurances about how carefully it handles warrantless spy data to avoid abuses or leaks.

In his final congressional testimony before he was fired by President Trump this month, then-FBI Director James Comey unequivocally told lawmakers his agency used sensitive espionage data gathered about Americans without a warrant only when it was “lawfully collected, carefully overseen and checked.”

Once-top secret U.S. intelligence community memos reviewed by Circa tell a different story, citing instances of “disregard” for rules, inadequate training and “deficient” oversight and even one case of deliberately sharing spy data with a forbidden party.

Formerly Top Secret Document
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ico ... r_2017.pdf

[The Conservative]

I got an idea, lets just burn it all down and rebuild from the ashes?

[pineapplemike]

Man what the fuck is going on? Trying to catch up on this false Russian intel story, to me it looks like, to quote apeman, they're just piling layers of stupid on top of a foundation of stupid