UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by clubgop » Wed May 08, 2019 10:20 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed May 08, 2019 8:46 am
clubgop wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 10:19 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 6:02 pm




Not a US citizen.

I love how you faggots seamlessly transition between American citizenship and ethnicity however it suits you
I think it is a citizen. Born to a US citizen mother.
Not really. Immigration law is fucked and unconstitutional. Churchill could have been an American president if that were the case.
If that were the case Monty would be speaking German right now, but to hear his views on free speech he is already half way there anyway.

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Ph64 » Wed May 08, 2019 10:39 pm

All i heard from the OP is Monte posting negatively about a recent UK mixed-race immigrant.

Who would guess that actually Monte is really a secret racist xenophobic bigot? :evil:

I think the UK thought police should bring him in for questioning over his hateful comments.
Hate speech should not be allowed, he's said so himself.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by StCapps » Wed May 08, 2019 10:55 pm

Winston Churchill was too busy destroying the Empire he loved to become POTUS. Womp Womp.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Wed May 08, 2019 11:14 pm

I think you mean sacrificing the Empire to save the free world.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by StCapps » Wed May 08, 2019 11:21 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed May 08, 2019 11:14 pm
I think you mean sacrificing the Empire to save the free world.
The British Empire didn't save the free world, in either world war. America simply bailed them out, both times, and made out like bandits. There was no need for Winston Churchill to sacrifice the empire, self inflicted wound, never had to happen.

In fact, in the second world war, the result was the free world lost ground, not gain ground. Getting in bed with Communists will do that. Iron Curtain up your ass Churchill.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed May 08, 2019 11:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Wed May 08, 2019 11:24 pm

Invading Poland was Churchill's biggest mistake.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by StCapps » Wed May 08, 2019 11:26 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed May 08, 2019 11:24 pm
Invading Poland was Churchill's biggest mistake.
Didn't have to go to war "for Poland", dumb call. Didn't have to go to war "for Belgium", dumb call. Both on Churchill, both extremely counter-productive to preserving the Empire he loved, self inflicted wounds. He destroyed the Empire in a lame attempt to save the Empire, burning the village to save it for the fail.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed May 08, 2019 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Wed May 08, 2019 11:28 pm

Churchill should have been stopped after he annexed the Sudetenland.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by StCapps » Wed May 08, 2019 11:30 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed May 08, 2019 11:28 pm
Churchill should have been stopped after he annexed the Sudetenland.
He should have left Hitler alone, not his fight. He made it his fight because ZOMG Italy! and used Poland as a lame excuse, then allied with another country who also went on to invade Poland a week after Hitler did. They didn't care about Poland, that was just the Humanitarian Pixie Dust bullshit he used to justify going to war with Germany.

If you buy the propaganda, of "saving the free world" you're a rube.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed May 08, 2019 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Wed May 08, 2019 11:33 pm

Of course, if the French hadn't imposed such harsh reparations on Britain at the treaty of Versailles none of it needed to have happened.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image