Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by C-Mag » Thu Oct 19, 2017 8:11 am

ssu wrote:Btw. Russian nuclear weapons fuelled for a long time American nuclear power plants, from 1993 to 2013.

One of the best things that happened after the Cold War.
A total of 500 tonnes of Russian warhead grade HEU (equivalent to 20,008 nuclear warheads) were converted in Russia to nearly 15,000 tonnes tons of LEU (low enriched uranium) and sold to the US for use as fuel in American nuclear power plants. The program was the largest and most successful nuclear non-proliferation program to date. The first nuclear power plant to receive low-enriched fuel containing uranium under this program was the Cooper Nuclear Station in 1998.[5] During the 20-year Megatons to Megawatts program, as much as 10 percent of the electricity produced in the United States was generated by fuel fabricated using LEU from Russian HEU
So did Clinton get money from the Russians to get Urianium One? Oh, definately I would say.

But then again, corruption has been made totally legal in the US.

But then Uranium One isn't the only producer of uranium, or the largest ones. KazAtomProm is the World's largest, the second largest Cameco is the biggest American producer, then Areva and then Uranium One.

We have an epidemic of not hold Sr Leaders accountable. Think about it, no admin has really had to pay for any of there shady dealings since Iran Contra. That was 30 years ago.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by C-Mag » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:33 pm

US consulting firm with ties to the Clintons lobbied on behalf of Russia's nuclear giant
A Russian company, whose former executive was the target of an FBI investigation and who admitted to corrupt payments to influence the awarding of contracts with the Russian state-owned nuclear energy corporation, paid millions of dollars in consulting fees to an American firm in 2010 and 2011 to lobby the U.S. regulatory agencies and assist the Russians, who would go on to acquire twenty percent of American uranium, according to court documents, a former FBI informant and extensive interviews with law enforcement sources.

Roughly $3 million in payments from 2010 to 2011 were made to APCO Worldwide Inc. The firm also provided in kind pro-bono services to Bill Clinton's foundation, the Clinton Global Initiative, services they begin 2007, according to APCO officials who spoke with Circa and press releases from the company. In 2010, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was part of the Obama administration board that would eventually approve the sale of U.S. uranium supply to a Russian company.
https://www.circa.com/story/2017/10/19/ ... an-uranium
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by C-Mag » Fri Oct 20, 2017 1:52 pm

Todays Update

WHY IS SESSIONS HIDING URANIUM ONE INFORMANT?

Victoria Toensing, a lawyer for the former FBI informant, told Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” that her client has “specific information about contributions and bribes to various entities and people in the United States.”

She said she could not go further because her client has not been released from a nondisclosure agreement but suggested the gag order could be lifted soon. Toensing also claimed that her client was “threatened by the Loretta Lynch Justice Department” when he pursued a civil action in which he reportedly sought to disclose some information about the case.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Grassley said such an NDA would “appear to improperly prevent the individual from making critical, good faith disclosures to Congress of potential wrongdoing.”…

The Hill reported earlier this week that the FBI had evidence as early as 2009 that Russian operatives used bribes, kickbacks and other dirty tactics to expand Moscow’s atomic energy footprint in the U.S. Grassley on Wednesday released a series of letters he fired off last week to 10 federal agencies, raising the question of whether the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) which approved the uranium transaction was aware of that FBI probe -- and pointing to potential “conflicts” involving the Clintons. The committee included then-Secretary of State Clinton......

So why not just lift the gag order, vacate the non-disclosure agreement, which Sessions has the power to do, and key the informant come forward with information on how and why the Clintons conspired to put 20 percent of our uranium assets under Russian control while lining the pockets of the Clintons and their pay-for-play foundation? As Toensing notes, Sessions could do it, and thereby bring to light the details of this criminal enterprise:

The lead investigators on the case included Rod Rosenstein, who is now the deputy attorney general, and Andrew McCabe, who is now the deputy FBI director. Rosenstein is the DOJ official who appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller to investigate alleged collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and Russia.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the collusion/campaign investigation. He could waive the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) signed by the informant, said Toensing. "Yes, Jeff could do it," she said. "He is not recused from this matter and should not be."

However, Rod Rosenstein "is conflicted," said Toensing, "because he was the U.S. attorney who oversaw the case involving my client." Toensing added that she has "asked an oversight committee to pursue the release" of the NDA so her client may testify before Congress about what he knows.

The Executive Branch does not have the authority to use non-disclosure agreements to avoid Congressional scrutiny," Grassley wrote. "If the FBI is allowed to contract itself out of Congressional oversight, it would seriously undermine our Constitutional system of checks and balances. The Justice Department needs to work with the Committee to ensure that witnesses are free to speak without fear, intimidation or retaliation from law enforcement."
http://www.912communique.com/profiles/b ... -informant

Summary
1. Apparent witness sits there that can show criminality on the part of high ranking officials
2. witness was forced to sign Non Disclosure agreement
3. Senate has asked that NDA be lifted
4. AG Sessions said he won't lift it
5. Senate states the Executive Branch does not have the authority to withhold information from the Legislative Branch

IMO, if we want any Swamp Draining, this is the issue, this is the case that needs to be litigated and if proven, people need to go to jail. This case shows how the Executive Branch colludes with the Intelligence Community and the Judicial Branch to enrich themselves and sell American down the river.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by Fife » Fri Oct 20, 2017 1:56 pm

All this Uranium One shit is about make the state cut a motherfucker or two.

Image

CIA ‘working to take down’ WikiLeaks threat, agency chief says
The head of the CIA lumped WikiLeaks with al Qaeda and the Islamic State and said his agency is working toward reducing the “enormous threat” posed by each of them.
CIA Director Mike Pompeo placed the antisecrecy website in the same category as terrorist organizations while speaking Thursday at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies’ National Security Summit in D.C.

“I talked about these non-state actors, and it’s not just Wikileaks. Indeed I may have overemphasized them — they are an enormous threat, we are working to take down that threat to the United States as well, to reduce the threat from all of it,” Mr. Pompeo said. “But Hezbollah, [the Islamic State], al Qaeda, none of them sit at the U.N., these are all non-state actors, each of which has not only cyber capacity, but they look and feel like very good intelligence organizations.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by C-Mag » Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:24 pm

Fife wrote:All this Uranium One shit is about make the state cut a motherfucker or two.
OH YEAH, I really think this could be the Battle Royale. I've looked to see what Corporate Media is saying about this, and the opposition to Trumps comments on this and there is basically no real 'other side' to this. They say, 'Oh, this is an old scandal' and kind of try to blow it off. They laughed at Trump when he said he was spied on, not this time. They are either not saying anything or just giving a pfft response to dismiss it. Boy, there are A LOT of Swamp Monsters tied up in this one. I'll be you a weekend Tenessee Vol Football throwdown that there are Senior GOP members who got something out of this deal too.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by C-Mag » Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:45 pm

Russian Spies had penetrated Sec Clintons Inner Circle
In 2010, the FBI arrested ten Russian spies as part of "Operation Ghost Stories." According to a top FBI official, the agency had to act quickly because the "deep cover" agents had come very close to "a sitting US cabinet member." They had already infiltrated then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's inner circle, befriending a Democratic fundraiser close to Clinton. Clinton's Russian connections have attracted more scrutiny following recent revelations of an FBI investigation into Russian company Rosatom, which gained control of 20 percent of U.S. uranium in the 2010 Uranium One deal.

"We were becoming very concerned," Frank Figliuzzi, the FBI's assistant director of counterintelligence, told the BBC in 2012. "They were getting close enough to a sitting US cabinet member that we thought we could no longer allow this to continue."
https://pjmedia.com/trending/fbi-arrest ... -one-deal/
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by C-Mag » Fri Oct 20, 2017 4:19 pm

Why didn't the Spies stand trial in the US ?
The FBI found that Russian intelligence had targeted Hillary Clinton before and during her time as secretary of state. Clinton’s spokespersons denied that this was so. Clinton opposed the Magnitsky sanctions on officials tied to Putin. After her husband received a half-million dollars in Moscow from a Kremlin-connected investment bank, Clinton moved with unusual speed to whisk the ring of 10 Russian spies out of the country and back to Moscow. She had the lopsided swap take place over a long summer weekend, before the FBI was finished with the spies, and before the spies could stand trial. While the FBI was separately investigating Russians involved with buying Uranium One, she approved the sale of American uranium to Russia’s nuclear weapons agency. Principals in the sale then plowed $145 million into her family foundation and projects.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10 ... -question/
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by nmoore63 » Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:11 pm

#DrainTheSwamp

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by C-Mag » Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:21 pm

nmoore63 wrote:#DrainTheSwamp

:pray:

The odds are not in our favor.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by clubgop » Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:28 pm

I'll take them shutting the fuck up about the whole Russian thing. Take that and a tax return you can fill out on a postcard and 2018 may not be as bad, it might I dare say be good.